Halit Pinar
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Halit Pinar has a total of 30 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adrian K. Charles
Department of Paediatric and Perinatal Pathology, PathWest, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
1 shared publication - Adrienne Gordon
Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
1 shared publication - Barbara J. Stoll
McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
1 shared publication - Carol J. Rowland Hogue
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
1 shared publication - Carolyn Drews-Botsch
George Mason University, College of Public Health (C.D.B.), Fairfax, Virginia, USA
1 shared publication - Catherine Harrison
Department of Paediatric and Perinatal Pathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Australia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 July 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 18 (1) , 306
Association of participation in a supplemental nutrition program with stillbirth by race, ethnicity, and maternal characteristics
Participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) has been associated with lower risk of stillbirth. We hypothesized that such an association would differ by race/ethnicity because of factors associated with WIC participation that confound the association. We conducted a secondary analysis of the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network’s population-based case-control study of stillbirths and live-born controls, enrolled at delivery between March 2006 and September 2008. Weighting accounted for study design and differential consent. Five nested models using multivariable logistic regression examined whether the WIC participation/stillbirth associations were attenuated after sequential adjustment for sociodemographic, health, healthcare, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors. Models also included an interaction term for race/ethnicity x WIC. In the final model, WIC participation was associated with lower adjusted odds (aOR) of stillbirth among non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.34; 95% CI 0.16, 0.72) but not among non-Hispanic White (aOR: 1.69; 95% CI: 0.89, 3.20) or Hispanic women (aOR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.52, 1.52). Contrary to our hypotheses, control for potential confounding factors did not explain disparate findings by race/ethnicity. Rather, WIC may be most beneficial to women with the greatest risk factors for stillbirth. WIC-eligible, higher-risk women who do not participate may be missing the potential health associated benefits afforded by WIC.
- 24 July 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 18 (1) , 306
Open AccessAssociation of participation in a supplemental nutrition program with stillbirth by race, ethnicity, and maternal characteristics
Participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) has been associated with lower risk of stillbirth. We hypothesized that such an association would differ by race/ethnicity because of factors associated with WIC participation that confound the association. We conducted a secondary analysis of the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network’s population-based case-control study of stillbirths and live-born controls, enrolled at delivery between March 2006 and September 2008. Weighting accounted for study design and differential consent. Five nested models using multivariable logistic regression examined whether the WIC participation/stillbirth associations were attenuated after sequential adjustment for sociodemographic, health, healthcare, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors. Models also included an interaction term for race/ethnicity x WIC. In the final model, WIC participation was associated with lower adjusted odds (aOR) of stillbirth among non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.34; 95% CI 0.16, 0.72) but not among non-Hispanic White (aOR: 1.69; 95% CI: 0.89, 3.20) or Hispanic women (aOR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.52, 1.52). Contrary to our hypotheses, control for potential confounding factors did not explain disparate findings by race/ethnicity. Rather, WIC may be most beneficial to women with the greatest risk factors for stillbirth. WIC-eligible, higher-risk women who do not participate may be missing the potential health associated benefits afforded by WIC.
- Open Access
- 10 June 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 9 (1) , 22
Causes of death and associated conditions (Codac) – a utilitarian approach to the classification of perinatal deaths
A carefully classified dataset of perinatal mortality will retain the most significant information on the causes of death. Such information is needed for health care policy development, surveillance and international comparisons, clinical services and research. For comparability purposes, we propose a classification system that could serve all these needs, and be applicable in both developing and developed countries. It is developed to adhere to basic concepts of underlying cause in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), although gaps in ICD prevent classification of perinatal deaths solely on existing ICD codes.
- 10 June 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 9 (1) , 22
Open AccessCauses of death and associated conditions (Codac) – a utilitarian approach to the classification of perinatal deaths
A carefully classified dataset of perinatal mortality will retain the most significant information on the causes of death. Such information is needed for health care policy development, surveillance and international comparisons, clinical services and research. For comparability purposes, we propose a classification system that could serve all these needs, and be applicable in both developing and developed countries. It is developed to adhere to basic concepts of underlying cause in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), although gaps in ICD prevent classification of perinatal deaths solely on existing ICD codes.