High variation in manufacturer-declared serving size of packaged discretionary foods in Australia
- 17 March 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Nutrition
- Vol. 115 (10) , 1810-1818
Abstract
Despite the potential of declared serving size to encourage appropriate portion size consumption, most countries including Australia have not developed clear reference guidelines for serving size. The present study evaluated variability in manufacturer-declared serving size of discretionary food and beverage products in Australia, and how declared serving size compared with the 2013 Australian Dietary Guideline (ADG) standard serve (600 kJ). Serving sizes were obtained from the Nutrition Information Panel for 4466 packaged, discretionary products in 2013 at four large supermarkets in Sydney, Australia, and categorised into fifteen categories in line with the 2013 ADG. For unique products that were sold in multiple package sizes, the percentage difference between the minimum and the maximum serving size across different package sizes was calculated. A high variation in serving size was found within the majority of food and beverage categories – for example, among 347 non-alcoholic beverages (e.g. soft drinks), the median for serving size was 250 (interquartile range (IQR) 250, 355) ml (range 100–750 ml). Declared serving size for unique products that are available in multiple package sizes also showed high variation, particularly for chocolate-based confectionery, with median percentage difference between minimum and maximum serving size of 183 (IQR 150) %. Categories with a high proportion of products that exceeded the 600 kJ ADG standard serve included cakes and muffins, pastries and desserts (≥74 % for each). High variability in declared serving size may confound interpretation and understanding of consumers interested in standardising and controlling their portion selection. Future research is needed to assess if and how standardising declared serving size might affect consumer behaviour.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Potential problems with increasing serving sizes on the Nutrition Facts labelAppetite, 2015
- Smart food policies for obesity preventionThe Lancet, 2015
- Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013The Lancet, 2014
- Improving the design of nutrition labels to promote healthier food choices and reasonable portion sizesInternational Journal of Obesity, 2014
- Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2012
- Energy Density, Portion Size, and Eating Occasions: Contributions to Increased Energy Intake in the United States, 1977–2006PLOS Medicine, 2011
- Snacking patterns among adolescents: a comparison of type, frequency and portion size between Britain in 1997 and Northern Ireland in 2005British Journal of Nutrition, 2008
- How the Nutrition Food Label Was Developed, Part 1: The Nutrition Facts PanelJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 2008
- Patient Understanding of Food LabelsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006
- Patterns and Trends in Food Portion Sizes, 1977-1998JAMA, 2003