Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 7 April 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Critical Care
- Vol. 10 (2) , R55
Abstract
Introduction: Tracheostomy is one of the more commonly performed procedures in critically ill patients yet the optimal method of performing tracheostomies in this population remains to be established. The aim of this study was to systematically review and quantitatively synthesize all randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparing elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and surgical tracheostomy (ST) in adult critically ill patients with regards to major short and long term outcomes. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Additionally, bibliographies and selected conference proceedings were reviewed, and experts in the field and manufacturers of two PDT kits were contacted. Randomized clinical trials comparing any method of elective PDT to ST that included critically ill adults and reported at least one clinically relevant outcome were included. Data extracted included trial characteristics, measures of study validity, and clinically relevant outcomes. Results: Seventeen RCTs involving 1,212 patients were included. Most PDTs used a multiple dilator technique and were performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). The pooled odds ratio (OR) for wound infection was 0.28 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16 to 0.49, p < 0.0005), indicating a significant reduction with PDT compared to ST. Overall, PDT was equivalent to ST for bleeding, major peri-procedural and long-term complications; however, subgroup analysis suggested PDT resulted in a lower incidence of bleeding (OR = 0.29 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.75, p = 0.01)) and death (OR = 0.71 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.0, p = 0.05)) when the STs were performed in the operating theatre. Conclusion: PDT reduces the overall incidence of wound infection and may further reduce clinical relevant bleeding and mortality when compared with ST performed in the operating theatre. PDT, performed in the ICU, should be considered the procedure of choice for performing elective tracheostomies in critically ill adult patients.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: A randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Extended Indications for Percutaneous TracheostomyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilationBMJ, 2005
- The current practice of tracheostomy in the United Kingdom: a postal surveyAnaesthesia, 2005
- Videobronchoscopic guidance makes percutaneous dilational tracheostomy saferSurgical Endoscopy, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Laparoscopic surgery and surgical infectionBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Percutaneous Tracheostomy: A Clinical Comparison of Dilatational (Ciaglia) and Translaryngeal (Fantoni) TechniquesAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1999
- A comparison of percutaneous and operative tracheostomies in intensive care patientsCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995