Varying choice set sizes in discrete choice experiments
- 28 May 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Choice Modelling
- Vol. 52
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- EuroQol Research Foundation
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- mixl: An open-source R package for estimating complex choice models on large datasetsJournal of Choice Modelling, 2021
- Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and FuturePharmacoEconomics, 2018
- Investigating the impact of design characteristics on statistical efficiency within discrete choice experiments: A systematic surveyContemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 2018
- How many choice sets and alternatives are optimal? Consistency in choice experimentsAgribusiness, 2010
- Testing the boundaries of the choice overload phenomenon: The effect of number of options and time pressure on decision difficulty and satisfactionPsychology & Marketing, 2009
- Leaving the store empty‐handed: Testing explanations for the too‐much‐choice effect using decision field theoryPsychology & Marketing, 2009
- Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial AssessmentEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2006
- More choice is better: Effects of assortment size and composition on assortment evaluationInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 2005
- Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice ConsistencyJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002
- EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of lifeHealth Policy, 1990