Influence of packaging, husbandry, feeding practices, and price transparency on consumer segments preferences for milk in Germany: A conjoint and latent class analysis
Authors:
- Stephan G.H. MeyerdingSMStephan G.H. Meyerding
- Anja SeidemannASAnja Seidemann
Open Access
- 18 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Future Foods
- Vol. 10
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consumers' willingness to pay for an animal welfare food labelEcological Economics, 2023
- High hopes for front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labels? A conjoint analysis on the trade-offs between a FOP label, nutrition claims, brand and price for different consumer segmentsAppetite, 2022
- Consumer perceptions, preferences, and behavior regarding pasture-raised livestock products: A reviewFood Quality and Preference, 2020
- Traditional attributes moo-ve over for some consumer segments: Relative ranking of fluid milk attributesAppetite, 2019
- Evidence from Retail Food Markets That Consumers Are Confused by Natural and Organic Food LabelsJournal of Consumer Policy, 2018
- Labels for Animal Husbandry Systems Meet Consumer Preferences: Results from a Meta-analysis of Consumer StudiesJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2016
- Food choice in low income populations – A reviewFood Quality and Preference, 2015
- The impact of fat content, production methods and carbon footprint information on consumer preferences for minced meatFood Quality and Preference, 2013
- Market price differentials for food packaging characteristicsFood Quality and Preference, 2012
- An Index of Factorial SimplicityPsychometrika, 1974