Market segmentation
Authors:
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science
- Vol. 2 (1) , 25-34
Abstract
Acceptance of the benefits of market segmentation is so pervasive that it seems almost sacrilegious to question the validity of this faith in the power of segmentation as a marketing tool. But, at the risk of being labelled heretics, argues that segmentation is not the marketers’ nirvana it is sometimes made out to be. Discusses a number of assumptions and arbitrary decisions involved in the segmentation process, including beliefs about the selection of base variables, the analysis method chosen, the number and composition of segments, the validity of the solution and its stability over time. Reviews techniques for assessing the reliability of the outcome, and concludes that managers should be more aware of the limitations of segmentation studies.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Market Segmentation: A ReviewEuropean Journal of Marketing, 1987
- Person-Situation: Segmentation's Missing LinkJournal of Marketing, 1982
- Evaluation of Conjoint Analysis Results: A Comparison of MethodsJournal of Marketing Research, 1980
- The Stability of Benefit SegmentsJournal of Marketing Research, 1978
- Classification for Market Segmentation: An Improved Linear Model for Solving Problems of Arbitrary OriginManagement Science, 1977
- Purchasing Strategies across Product CategoriesJournal of Consumer Research, 1976
- Approaches to Market Segmentation AnalysisJournal of Marketing, 1976
- The Pitfalls of AID AnalysisJournal of Marketing Research, 1975
- Personality and the Determinants of Product ChoiceJournal of Marketing Research, 1972
- Market Segmentation: Group versus Individual BehaviorJournal of Marketing Research, 1968