Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for hysterectomy in a hospital network with audit and feedback: A stepped‐wedge cluster randomised trial
Authors:
- Eva PaganoEPEva Pagano
- for the ERAS‐Gyneco Piemonte GroupFGfor the ERAS‐Gyneco Piemonte Group
Open Access
- 25 February 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 131 (9) , 1207-1217
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing elective hysterectomy in a network of regional hospitals, supported by an intensive audit‐and‐feedback (A&F) approach.Design: A multi‐centre, stepped‐wedge cluster randomised trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04063072).Setting: Gynaecological units in the Piemonte region, Italy.Population: Patients undergoing elective hysterectomy, either for cancer or for benign conditions.Methods: Twenty‐three units (clusters), stratified by surgical volume, were randomised into four sequences. At baseline (first 3 months), standard care was continued in all units. Subsequently, the four sequences implemented the ERAS protocol successively every 3 months, after specific training. By the end of the study, each unit had a period in which standard care was maintained (control) and a period in which the protocol, supported by feedback, was applied (experimental).Main outcome measures: Length of hospital stay (LOS), without outliers (>98th percentile).Results: Between September 2019 and May 2021, 2086 patients were included in the main analysis with an intention‐to‐treat approach: 1104 (53%) in the control period and 982 (47%) in the ERAS period. Compliance with the ERAS protocol increased from 60% in the control period to 76% in the experimental period, with an adjusted absolute difference of +13.3% (95% CI 11.6% to 15.0%). LOS, moving from 3.5 to 3.2 days, did not show a significant reduction (−0.12 days; 95% CI −0.30 to 0.07 days). No difference was observed in the occurrence of complications.Conclusions: Implementation of the ERAS protocol for hysterectomy at the regional level, supported by an A&F approach, resulted in a substantial improvement in compliance, but without meaningful effects on LOS and complications. This study confirms the effectiveness of A&F in promoting important innovations in an entire hospital network and suggests the need of a higher compliance with the ERAS protocol to obtain valuable improvements in clinical outcomes.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministero della Salute (NET‐2016‐02364191)
- Regione Piemonte (521‐A14000)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dissecting the Perioperative Care BundleSurgical Clinics of North America, 2021
- Evaluation of the Implementation of Multiple Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways Across a Provincial Health Care System in Alberta, CanadaJAMA Network Open, 2021
- Laparoscopic Surgery and the debate on its safety during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of recommendationsThe Surgeon, 2021
- Validation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in gynecologic surgery: an Italian randomized studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020
- PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgeryEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2020
- Critical Care Utilization for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Lombardy, ItalyJAMA, 2020
- Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomesCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012
- Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer SurgeryArchives of Surgery, 2011
- Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgeryCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011
- Quality of life and surgical satisfaction after vaginal reconstructive vs obliterative surgery for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapseAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008