Eva Pagano

PURPOSE: In 2009, a regional audit on ovarian cancer in the Regional Cancer Care Network (RCCN) of Piemonte (Italy) documented that patients were widely distributed across different treatment centers, with evidence of suboptimal care. We present the re-audit and feedback (A&F) intervention performed in 2016-2020 and the variation on quality of care and outcomes. METHODS: An A&F intervention was implemented across gynecologic units treating ovarian cancer in Piemonte. Key recommendations and indicators were identified from international guidelines. Global adherence to guideline recommendations was measured as the mean percentage of adherence across all the indicators. Data were collected retrospectively (May-December 2016, baseline period) and prospectively (May 2017-September 2020). Change in adherence to recommendations over time was monitored and feedback provided during quarterly meetings. Overall survival was identified as clinical outcome. RESULTS: Among 1,030 women (77% advanced stage), the global adherence to guidelines increased by 2.1% (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.6) every 6 months, from 51.3% to 70.4%. The likelihood of treatment in high-volume surgical centers and multidisciplinary team discussions before treatment increased over time (odds ratio [OR], 1.15 [95% CI, 1.08 to 1.21] and OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.15 to 1.28]). Five-year survival was 47% overall (87% among early and 35% among advanced stages). Although no consistent trend in survival was observed during the A&F period, a 10% increase in global adherence was associated with improved 5-year survival (hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.95]). CONCLUSION: The implementation of this A&F initiative was associated with improvements in quality-of-care indicators for ovarian cancer, highlighting the potential value of A&F methodologies to support quality improvement activities.

Background/Objectives: Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is one of the most reliable indicators to assess the impact of multimorbidity on COVID-19-related outcomes. Moreover, the patient’s clinical conditions are associated with SARS-CoV-2 outcomes. This study aimed to analyze the association between multimorbidity and COVID-19-related outcomes, evaluating whether the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) mediated these associations. Methods: Data were obtained through the platform “EPICLIN”. We analyzed all patients who tested positive for COVID-19 after accessing the emergency department (ED) of San Luigi Gonzaga (Orbassano) and Molinette (Turin) hospitals from 1 March to 30 June 2020. Different outcomes were assessed: non-discharge from the ED, 30-day mortality, ICU admission/death among hospitalized patients, and length of hospitalization among surviving patients. Two subgroups of patients (<65 and 65+ years old) were analyzed using logistic regressions, Cox models, and mediation analyses. Results: There was a greater risk of not being discharged or dying among those who were younger and with CCI ≥ 2. Moreover, the higher the CCI, the longer the length of hospitalization. Considering older subjects, a greater CCI was associated with a higher risk of death. Regarding the mediation analyses, multimorbidity significantly impacted the hospitalization length and not being discharged in the younger population. Instead, in the older population, the NEWS2 played a mediation role. Conclusions: This research showed that multimorbidity is a risk factor for a worse prognosis of COVID-19. Moreover, there was a strong direct effect of CCI on not being discharged, and the NEWS2 was found to act as mediator in the association between multimorbidity and COVID-19-related outcomes.

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are known to potentially improve the management and outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal surgery, with limited evidence of their implementation in hospital networks and in a large population. We aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of an ERAS protocol in colorectal cancer surgery in the entire region of Piemonte, Italy, supported by an audit and feedback (A&F) intervention. Methods: A large, stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial enrolled patients scheduled for elective surgery at 29 general surgery units (clusters). At baseline (first 3 months), standard care was continued in all units. Thereafter, four groups of clusters began to adopt the ERAS protocol successively. By the end of the study, each cluster had a period in which standard care was maintained (control) and a period in which the protocol was applied (experimental). ERAS implementation was supported by initial training and A&F initiatives. The primary endpoint was length of stay (LOS) without outliers (>94th percentile), and the secondary endpoints were outliers for LOS, postoperative medical and surgical complications, quality of recovery and compliance with ERAS items. Results: Of 2626 randomised patients, 2397 were included in the LOS analysis (1060 in the control period and 1337 in the experimental period). The mean LOS without outliers was 8.5 days during the control period (SD 3.9) and 7.5 (SD 3.5) during the experimental one. The adjusted difference between the two periods was a reduction of −0.58 days (95% CI −1.07, −0.09; p=0.021). The compliance with ERAS items increased from 52.4% to 67.3% (estimated absolute difference +13%; 95% CI 11.4%, 14.7%). No difference in the occurrence of complications was evidenced (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.89, 1.68). Conclusion: Implementation of the ERAS protocol for colorectal cancer, supported by A&F approach, led to a substantial improvement in compliance and a reduction in LOS, without meaningful effects on complications. Trial registration number NCT04037787.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing elective hysterectomy in a network of regional hospitals, supported by an intensive audit‐and‐feedback (A&F) approach.Design: A multi‐centre, stepped‐wedge cluster randomised trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04063072).Setting: Gynaecological units in the Piemonte region, Italy.Population: Patients undergoing elective hysterectomy, either for cancer or for benign conditions.Methods: Twenty‐three units (clusters), stratified by surgical volume, were randomised into four sequences. At baseline (first 3 months), standard care was continued in all units. Subsequently, the four sequences implemented the ERAS protocol successively every 3 months, after specific training. By the end of the study, each unit had a period in which standard care was maintained (control) and a period in which the protocol, supported by feedback, was applied (experimental).Main outcome measures: Length of hospital stay (LOS), without outliers (>98th percentile).Results: Between September 2019 and May 2021, 2086 patients were included in the main analysis with an intention‐to‐treat approach: 1104 (53%) in the control period and 982 (47%) in the ERAS period. Compliance with the ERAS protocol increased from 60% in the control period to 76% in the experimental period, with an adjusted absolute difference of +13.3% (95% CI 11.6% to 15.0%). LOS, moving from 3.5 to 3.2 days, did not show a significant reduction (−0.12 days; 95% CI −0.30 to 0.07 days). No difference was observed in the occurrence of complications.Conclusions: Implementation of the ERAS protocol for hysterectomy at the regional level, supported by an A&F approach, resulted in a substantial improvement in compliance, but without meaningful effects on LOS and complications. This study confirms the effectiveness of A&F in promoting important innovations in an entire hospital network and suggests the need of a higher compliance with the ERAS protocol to obtain valuable improvements in clinical outcomes.

Late diagnosis and the lack of screening methods for early detection define high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) as the gynecological malignancy with the highest mortality rate. In the work presented here, we investigated a retrospective and multicentric cohort of 250 archival Papanicolaou (Pap) test smears collected during routine gynecological screening. Samples were taken at different time points (from 1 month to 13.5 years before diagnosis) from 113 presymptomatic women who were subsequently diagnosed with HGSOC (pre-HGSOC) and from 77 healthy women. Genome instability was detected through low-pass whole-genome sequencing of DNA derived from Pap test samples in terms of copy number profile abnormality (CPA). CPA values of DNA extracted from Pap test samples from pre-HGSOC women were substantially higher than those in samples from healthy women. Consistently with the longitudinal analysis of clonal pathogenic TP53 mutations, this assay could detect HGSOC presence up to 9 years before diagnosis. This finding confirms the continual shedding of tumor cells from fimbriae toward the endocervical canal, suggesting a new path for the early diagnosis of HGSOC. We integrated the CPA score into the EVA (early ovarian cancer) test, the sensitivity of which was 75% (95% CI, 64.97 to 85.79), the specificity 96% (95% CI, 88.35 to 100.00), and the accuracy 81%. This proof-of-principle study indicates that the early diagnosis of HGSOC is feasible through the analysis of genomic alterations in DNA from endocervical smears.

Adults with obesity have a higher risk of hospitalization and high hospitalization-related healthcare costs. However, a predictive model for the risk of readmission in patients with severe obesity is lacking. We conducted a retrospective cohort study enrolling all patients admitted for severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) between 2009 and 2018 to the Istituto Auxologico Italiano in Piancavallo. For each patient, all subsequent hospitalizations were identified from the regional database by a deterministic record-linkage procedure. A total of 1136 patients were enrolled and followed up for a median of 5.7 years (IQR: 3.1–8.2). The predictive factors associated with hospital readmission were age (HR = 1.02, 95%CI: 1.01–1.03, p < 0.001), BMI (HR = 1.02, 95%CI: 1.01–1.03, p = 0.001), smoking habit (HR = 1.17, 95%CI: 0.99–1.38, p = 0.060), serum creatinine (HR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.04–1.44, p = 0.016), diabetes (HR = 1.17, 95%CI: 1.00–1.36, p = 0.045), and number of admissions in the previous two years (HR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.07–1.23, p < 0.001). BMI lost its predictive role when restricting the analysis to readmissions within 90 days. BMI and diabetes lost their predictive roles when further restricting the analysis to readmissions within 30 days. In conclusion, in this study, we identified predictive variables associated with early and long-term hospital readmission in patients with severe obesity. Whether addressing modifiable risk factors could improve the outcome remains to be established.

PURPOSE: In the absence of clear evidence from randomized trials, the intensity of follow-up regimens after surgical treatment of endometrial cancer is highly variable in clinical practice. To reduce this uncertainty, we conducted a randomized trial to test whether an intensive (INT) versus a minimalist (MIN) follow-up regimen improves overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing operation for endometrial cancer. METHODS: The TOTEM study was a large, pragmatic randomized trial, conducted in 42 hospitals (in Italy and France) including patients surgically treated for endometrial cancer, in complete clinical remission, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-IV. After stratification by center and risk of relapse (low or high), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to INT or MIN hospital-based follow-up regimens. The study was powered to demonstrate an absolute improvement of 5% of the 5-year OS with the INT regimen. RESULTS: In total, 1,871 patients were randomly assigned between November 2008 and July 2018, and 1,847 patients (98.7%) were available for the final analysis (60% low risk). After a median follow-up of 69 months, the 5-year OS was 90.6% in the INT and 91.9% in the MIN arms (hazard ratio, 1.13, 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.50, P = .380). No differences in OS were found in subgroup analyses considering age, cancer treatment, risk of relapse, and degree of adherence of the center to the scheduled follow-up. The probability of detecting a relapse was slightly higher in the INT arm (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.48; P = .194). CONCLUSION: An INT follow-up in endometrial cancer–treated patients does not improve OS, even in high-risk patients. According to available evidence, there is no need to routinely add vaginal cytology, laboratory, or imaging investigations to the MIN regimens used in this trial.