The development of autoverification rules applied to urinalysis performed on the AutionMAX-SediMAX platform
Authors:
- 1 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinica Chimica Acta
- Vol. 485, 275-281
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Establishment and development of the personalized criteria for microscopic review following multiple automated routine urinalysis systemsClinica Chimica Acta, 2015
- Optimal criteria for microscopic review of urinalysis following use of automated urine analyzerClinica Chimica Acta, 2015
- Validation and Optimization of Criteria for Manual Smear Review Following Automated Blood Cell Analysis in a Large University HospitalArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2013
- A Method for Optimizing and Validating Institution-Specific Flagging Criteria for Automated Cell CountersArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2010
- Urine sediment analysis: Analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX® — A new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyserClinica Chimica Acta, 2010
- The International Consensus Group for Hematology Review: Suggested Criteria for Action Following Automated CBC and WBC Differential AnalysisLaboratory Hematology, 2005
- Quantitative Urine Particle Analysis: Integrative Approach for the Optimal Combination of Automation with UF-100 and Microscopic Review with KOVA Cell ChamberClinical Chemistry, 2003
- Safely Reducing Manual Urine Microscopy Analyses by Combining Urine Flow Cytometer and Strip ResultsAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2001
- Towards European urinalysis guidelinesClinica Chimica Acta, 2000
- Automated Flow Cytometry Compared with an Automated Dipstick Reader for UrinalysisClinical Chemistry, 1999