Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by iCare tonometers and Goldmann applanation tonometer
Authors:
- 6 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 58 (5) , 426-432
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Lawson Health Research Institute
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with Icare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positionsBMC Ophthalmology, 2013
- Tight orbit syndrome: a previously unrecognized cause of open‐angle glaucomaActa Ophthalmologica, 2010
- The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thicknessClinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2009
- Anthropometry of Asian Eyelids by AgePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2008
- Reproducibility and Clinical Relevance of the Ocular Response Analyzer in Nonoperated Eyes: Corneal Biomechanical and Tonometric ImplicationsInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2008
- Clinical Comparison of the Icare Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation TonometryJournal of Glaucoma, 2008
- Dynamic contour tonometry: principle and useClinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2006
- Ethnic characteristics of eyelashes: a comparative analysis in Asian and Caucasian femalesBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2006
- Comparison of ICare Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Glaucoma PatientsJournal of Glaucoma, 2006
- Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studiesGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 1994