The perception of realistic and symbolic threat and its influence on prejudice, ingroup favouritism and prosocial response: The native population in the face of immigration / Percepción de amenaza realista y simbólica, su influencia sobre el prejuicio, el favoritismo endogrupal y la respuesta prosocial: la población nativa ante la inmigración
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Social Psychology: Revista de Psicología Social
- Vol. 29 (1) , 60-89
Abstract
In a context of inflow of immigration and economic crisis, new forms of prejudice and the activation of the perception of threat (realistic and symbolic) will determine the response to immigrant minorities (outgroups). The antecedents of threat are considered to be: the perception of the intergroup situation and the forms of affective prejudice. The outcome variables are ingroup favouritism, prosocial response, empathy and willingness to help. In a cross-sectional study based on a random survey of Basques (n = 500), structural equation modelling analyses were applied to test the differences between realistic and symbolic threat. The results indicate that when the majority group status is perceived as legitimate, the perception of realistic threat arises and this increases ingroup favouritism and decreases prosocial response to the outgroup, directly and through the expression of affective prejudice. Symbolic threat, on the other hand, plays a more limited role. Mechanisms of the perception of realistic and symbolic threat regarding attitudes of natives to immigrants are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social dominance‐based threat reactions to immigrants in need of assistanceEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2011
- From prejudice to discrimination: The legitimizing role of perceived threat in discrimination against immigrantsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2010
- An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudesEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2008
- When and How Do High Status Group Members Offer Help: Effects of Social Dominance Orientation and Status ThreatPolitical Psychology, 2008
- A New Scale for Measuring Adults' ProsocialnessEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2005
- Attitudes towards refugees: The dark side of prejudice in AustraliaAustralian Journal of Psychology, 2005
- Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement InvarianceStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2002
- Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability.Psychological Bulletin, 2001
- Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999
- Whites' opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group conflict?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983