Anna Wlodarczyk
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Anna Wlodarczyk has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Darío Páez
Facultad de Educación y Humanidades Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile. Centro de Investigación, Innovación y Creación, Universidad Catolica de Temuco
2 shared publications - Nekane Basabe
Departamento de Psicología Social, Universidad del País Vasco EHU
2 shared publications Carlos Reyes
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España
1 shared publicationLarraitz Zumeta
1 shared publicationLoreto Villagrán
Universidad San Sebastián, Concepción, Chile
1 shared publication- Magdalena Bobowik
University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 December 2014
- Published by SciELO Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID) in Terapia psicológica
- Vol. 32 (3) , 243-254
Afrontamiento comunal, crecimiento postraumático colectivo y bienestar social en el contexto del terremoto del 27 de febrero de 2010 en Chile
- 1 December 2014
- Published by SciELO Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID) in Terapia psicológica
- Vol. 32 (3) , 243-254
Open AccessAfrontamiento comunal, crecimiento postraumático colectivo y bienestar social en el contexto del terremoto del 27 de febrero de 2010 en Chile
- 1 January 2014
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Social Psychology: Revista de Psicología Social
- Vol. 29 (1) , 60-89
The perception of realistic and symbolic threat and its influence on prejudice, ingroup favouritism and prosocial response: The native population in the face of immigration / Percepción de amenaza realista y simbólica, su influencia sobre el prejuicio, el favoritismo endogrupal y la respuesta prosocial: la población nativa ante la inmigración
In a context of inflow of immigration and economic crisis, new forms of prejudice and the activation of the perception of threat (realistic and symbolic) will determine the response to immigrant minorities (outgroups). The antecedents of threat are considered to be: the perception of the intergroup situation and the forms of affective prejudice. The outcome variables are ingroup favouritism, prosocial response, empathy and willingness to help. In a cross-sectional study based on a random survey of Basques (n = 500), structural equation modelling analyses were applied to test the differences between realistic and symbolic threat. The results indicate that when the majority group status is perceived as legitimate, the perception of realistic threat arises and this increases ingroup favouritism and decreases prosocial response to the outgroup, directly and through the expression of affective prejudice. Symbolic threat, on the other hand, plays a more limited role. Mechanisms of the perception of realistic and symbolic threat regarding attitudes of natives to immigrants are discussed.
- 1 January 2014
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Social Psychology: Revista de Psicología Social
- Vol. 29 (1) , 60-89
The perception of realistic and symbolic threat and its influence on prejudice, ingroup favouritism and prosocial response: The native population in the face of immigration / Percepción de amenaza realista y simbólica, su influencia sobre el prejuicio, el favoritismo endogrupal y la respuesta prosocial: la población nativa ante la inmigración
In a context of inflow of immigration and economic crisis, new forms of prejudice and the activation of the perception of threat (realistic and symbolic) will determine the response to immigrant minorities (outgroups). The antecedents of threat are considered to be: the perception of the intergroup situation and the forms of affective prejudice. The outcome variables are ingroup favouritism, prosocial response, empathy and willingness to help. In a cross-sectional study based on a random survey of Basques (n = 500), structural equation modelling analyses were applied to test the differences between realistic and symbolic threat. The results indicate that when the majority group status is perceived as legitimate, the perception of realistic threat arises and this increases ingroup favouritism and decreases prosocial response to the outgroup, directly and through the expression of affective prejudice. Symbolic threat, on the other hand, plays a more limited role. Mechanisms of the perception of realistic and symbolic threat regarding attitudes of natives to immigrants are discussed.