Risk-Sharing and the Creation of Systemic Risk
Open Access
- 17 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Risk and Financial Management
- Vol. 13 (8) , 183
Abstract
We address the paradox that financial innovations aimed at risk-sharing appear to have made the world riskier. Financial innovations facilitate hedging idiosyncratic risks among agents; however, aggregate risks can be hedged only with liquid assets. When risk-sharing is primitive, agents self-hedge and hold more liquid assets; this buffers aggregate risks, resulting in few correlated failures compared to when there is greater risk sharing. We apply this insight to build a model of a clearinghouse to show that as risk-sharing improves, aggregate liquidity falls but correlated failures rise. Public liquidity injections, for example, in the form of a lender-of-last-resort can reduce this systemic risk ex post, but induce lower ex-ante levels of private liquidity, which can in turn aggravate welfare costs from such injections.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Financial Integration and Liquidity CrisesManagement Science, 2019
- Counterparty risk externality: Centralized versus over-the-counter marketsJournal of Economic Theory, 2014
- Clearing, Counterparty Risk, and Aggregate RiskIMF Economic Review, 2012
- Does a Central Clearing Counterparty Reduce Counterparty Risk?The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 2011
- Manufacturing Tail Risk: A Perspective on the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009Foundations and Trends® in Finance, 2010
- Managerial hedging, equity ownership, and firm valueThe RAND Journal of Economics, 2009
- Fire-Sale FDISSRN Electronic Journal, 2009
- Credit risk transfer and contagionJournal of Monetary Economics, 2006
- Was Prometheus Unbound by Chance? Risk, Diversification, and GrowthJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Preference shocks, liquidity, and central bank policy1987