Jean-François Petin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Jean-François Petin has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Gérard Morel
Nancy Research Centre for Automatic Control (CRAN), Nancy-Université, CNRS UMR 7039 Campus Science, BP 70239, 54506 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex, France
4 shared publications - Dominique Evrot
Université Henri Poincaré, CRAN, UMR 7039 CNRS-INPL-UHP
3 shared publications - Dominique Méry
Université de Lorraine and Telecom Nancy
3 shared publications - André Thomas
Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN
2 shared publications - Hind El Haouzi
Université de Lorraine, CRAN, UMR 7039, Campus Sciences
2 shared publications - Bernard Riera
CReSTIC (EA 3804), UFR des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Moulin de la Housse, BP 1039, 51687 Reims, France
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 June 2009
- Published by Elsevier in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
- Vol. 42 (5) , 275-280
Verification of functional constraints for safe product driven control
- 1 June 2009
- Published by Elsevier in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
- Vol. 42 (5) , 275-280
Verification of functional constraints for safe product driven control
- 1 January 2008
- Published by Elsevier in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
- Vol. 41 (2) , 10540-10545
SIMULATION AS A SUPPORT OF DESIGN AND VALIDATION OF A PRODUCT DRIVEN CONTROL SYSTEM
- 1 January 2008
- Published by Elsevier in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
- Vol. 41 (2) , 10540-10545
SIMULATION AS A SUPPORT OF DESIGN AND VALIDATION OF A PRODUCT DRIVEN CONTROL SYSTEM
- 1 January 2008
- Published by Elsevier in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
- Vol. 41 (3) , 94-99
Improving Digital Interaction for Operator-Driven Process-Plant Operation
- 1 January 2008
- Published by Elsevier in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
- Vol. 41 (3) , 94-99
Improving Digital Interaction for Operator-Driven Process-Plant Operation
- 31 May 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Control Engineering Practice
- Vol. 15 (5) , 595-614
Supervisory synthesis for product-driven automation and its application to a flexible assembly cell
- 31 May 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Control Engineering Practice
- Vol. 15 (5) , 595-614
Supervisory synthesis for product-driven automation and its application to a flexible assembly cell
- 19 April 2007
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Production Economics
- Vol. 112 (1) , 48-61
Contribution to reusability and modularity of manufacturing systems simulation models: Application to distributed control simulation within DFT context
- 19 April 2007
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Production Economics
- Vol. 112 (1) , 48-61
Contribution to reusability and modularity of manufacturing systems simulation models: Application to distributed control simulation within DFT context
- 1 January 2007
- Published by Elsevier in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
- Vol. 40 (6) , 127-132
USING SYSML FOR IDENTIFICATION AND REFINEMENT OF MACHINERY SAFETY PROPERTIES
- 1 January 2007
- Published by Elsevier in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
- Vol. 40 (6) , 127-132
USING SYSML FOR IDENTIFICATION AND REFINEMENT OF MACHINERY SAFETY PROPERTIES
- 1 January 2006
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Control
- Vol. 12 (2)
Formal Specification Method for Systems Automation
Currently automatic control deals with the theoretical modelling techniques applied to formally define the behaviour of a control system when the system goals and the process behaviour to be controlled are well defined. Although these approaches are efficient in the design and implementation phases for controlling the dynamics of automatized systems, other tools are also required in the early stages of the process of engineering a system. This paper deals with a specification method aimed at proving that the system goals, as required by the users, are formally refined towards the real target automation system with completeness, consistency, unambiguousness and correctness guarantees. Our specification method is based on the B language to globally verify, from formal constructs, the predicate:Control Systems Requirements ^ Process Systems Requirements Production System Requirements. A case study illustrates our approach and opens issues on the way to industrial practice.
- 1 January 2006
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Control
- Vol. 12 (2)
Formal Specification Method for Systems Automation
Currently automatic control deals with the theoretical modelling techniques applied to formally define the behaviour of a control system when the system goals and the process behaviour to be controlled are well defined. Although these approaches are efficient in the design and implementation phases for controlling the dynamics of automatized systems, other tools are also required in the early stages of the process of engineering a system. This paper deals with a specification method aimed at proving that the system goals, as required by the users, are formally refined towards the real target automation system with completeness, consistency, unambiguousness and correctness guarantees. Our specification method is based on the B language to globally verify, from formal constructs, the predicate:Control Systems Requirements ^ Process Systems Requirements Production System Requirements. A case study illustrates our approach and opens issues on the way to industrial practice.
- 1 January 2006
- Published by Elsevier
- p. 277-282
Formal specification of safe manufacturing machines using the B method
- 1 January 2006
- Published by Elsevier
- p. 277-282
Formal specification of safe manufacturing machines using the B method
- 1 January 2006
- Published by Elsevier in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
- Vol. 39 (3) , 281-286
FORMAL SPECIFICATION OF SAFE MANUFACTURING MACHINES USING THE B METHOD: APPLICATION TO A MECHANICAL PRESS
- 1 January 2006
- Published by Elsevier in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
- Vol. 39 (3) , 281-286
FORMAL SPECIFICATION OF SAFE MANUFACTURING MACHINES USING THE B METHOD: APPLICATION TO A MECHANICAL PRESS