Johann J. Kranz
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Johann J. Kranz has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Arnold Picot
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
3 shared publications - Abhishek Narain Singh
Assistant Professor, Institute of Management Technology Nagpur, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
1 shared publication - Amitabh Ojha
Research Design and Standards Organization, Ministry of Railway, Government of India, Lucknow, India
1 shared publication André Hanelt
Institute of Information Systems Georg‐August‐University Goettingen Platz der Goettinger Sieben 5 Goettingen 37073 Germany
1 shared publication- Benedikt Römer
Ludwig-Maximilians-University
1 shared publication - Chulmo Koo
Kyung Hee University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 18 February 2016
- Published by Wiley in Information Systems Journal
- Vol. 26 (5) , 477-517
Understanding the influence of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity on the process of business model change – the case of on‐premise and cloud‐computing software
The increasing popularity of Software as a Service has strongly affected the established business model of on‐premise enterprise software. Software as a Service has distinctive characteristics of disruptive innovations that typically create several difficulties for incumbent firms, in particular with regard to adapting business models. To date, however, little empirical understanding exists regarding the dynamics of business model change – a topic of special importance to the highly dynamic software industry, which is characterised by rapid and regular emergence of disruptive innovations. As disruptive innovations require gathering distant knowledge and experimenting with new ideas, this study addresses theoretical gaps regarding the role of absorptive capacity and organisational ambidexterity in the process of business model change owing to the emergence of a disruptive innovation. Drawing on evidence from multiple case studies of six incumbent vendors of enterprise resource‐planning software and informed by a thorough review of related secondary data, we investigate the pace and path of incumbents' business model adaptations. We propose a theoretical model that refines prior literature on absorptive capacity and organisational ambidexterity, particularly with regard to the process of business model change. This study identifies further technological factors that determine how and why incumbents change business models. In addition, our study provides in‐depth insights on the technological trajectory of enterprise resource‐planning software switching from on‐premise to on‐demand software services. © 2016 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- 18 February 2016
- Published by Wiley in Information Systems Journal
- Vol. 26 (5) , 477-517
Understanding the influence of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity on the process of business model change – the case of on‐premise and cloud‐computing software
The increasing popularity of Software as a Service has strongly affected the established business model of on‐premise enterprise software. Software as a Service has distinctive characteristics of disruptive innovations that typically create several difficulties for incumbent firms, in particular with regard to adapting business models. To date, however, little empirical understanding exists regarding the dynamics of business model change – a topic of special importance to the highly dynamic software industry, which is characterised by rapid and regular emergence of disruptive innovations. As disruptive innovations require gathering distant knowledge and experimenting with new ideas, this study addresses theoretical gaps regarding the role of absorptive capacity and organisational ambidexterity in the process of business model change owing to the emergence of a disruptive innovation. Drawing on evidence from multiple case studies of six incumbent vendors of enterprise resource‐planning software and informed by a thorough review of related secondary data, we investigate the pace and path of incumbents' business model adaptations. We propose a theoretical model that refines prior literature on absorptive capacity and organisational ambidexterity, particularly with regard to the process of business model change. This study identifies further technological factors that determine how and why incumbents change business models. In addition, our study provides in‐depth insights on the technological trajectory of enterprise resource‐planning software switching from on‐premise to on‐demand software services. © 2016 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- 23 January 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Electronic Markets
- Vol. 25 (1) , 7-16
Smart energy: where do we stand and where should we go?
- 23 January 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Electronic Markets
- Vol. 25 (1) , 7-16
Smart energy: where do we stand and where should we go?
- 13 November 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management
- Vol. 14 (4) , 225-239
Information Security Management (ISM) Practices: Lessons from Select Cases from India and Germany
- 13 November 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management
- Vol. 14 (4) , 225-239
Information Security Management (ISM) Practices: Lessons from Select Cases from India and Germany
- 27 August 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Wirtschaftsinformatik
- Vol. 55 (5) , 315-327
Green Information Systems wirksam einsetzen
- 27 August 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Wirtschaftsinformatik
- Vol. 55 (5) , 315-327
Green Information Systems wirksam einsetzen
- 23 October 2012
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 135-155
Challenges for Business Development in the Field of Smart Grids
- 23 October 2012
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 135-155
Challenges for Business Development in the Field of Smart Grids
- 23 October 2012
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 3-8
Introduction