E. Stirling Craig
Research Subjects
E. Stirling Craig has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Marc E. Walker
2 shared publicationsStefano Fusi
2 shared publicationsChristopher C. M.D. Ross
Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery (Lentz, Craig)
1 shared publicationJeffrey Salomon
Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
1 shared publication- Rachel Lentz
University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, Calif
1 shared publication Stefano M.D. Fusi
Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery (Lentz, Craig)
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 November 2012
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 130 (5) , 772e-773e
Does the Left Hand Know What the Right Hand Is Doing? What Plastic Surgeons Need to Know about Radiation Therapy Techniques
- 1 November 2012
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 130 (5) , 772e-773e
Does the Left Hand Know What the Right Hand Is Doing? What Plastic Surgeons Need to Know about Radiation Therapy Techniques
- 18 August 2012
- Published by Wiley in Microsurgery
- Vol. 33 (2) , 125-129
Immediate nipple reconstruction utilizing the DIEP flap in areola‐sparing mastectomy
The surgical treatment of breast cancer has dramatically evolved over the past decade toward an approach combining oncologic safety with aesthetic outcomes. The skin‐sparing mastectomy initiated this paradigm shift amongst breast surgeons and can be oncologically safe, in some cases sparing both the areola and the nipple. In accordance with the emphasis on aesthetics, some general surgeons have adopted new methods of resecting only the nipple, sparing the areola in select patients. The superior aesthetic results, durability, and decreased donor site morbidity of perforator flaps have brought autologous reconstruction back to the forefront of breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap as the gold standard. We describe a technique utilizing the DIEP flap skin paddle for immediate nipple reconstruction at the time of mastectomy and reconstruction, eliminating the need for delayed reconstruction and limiting donor site morbidity by concealing the donor site below the mastectomy skin flaps. In the six cases described performed between 2010 and 2012 (mean with 53 years; range 46–59 years), there have been no complications to the flap or the nipple postoperatively, nor has there been a need for further nipple revisions for 6 months. The nipple position relative to the flap breast mound has remained unchanged for up to 6 months. The immediate nipple reconstruction does not significantly lengthen operative time, requiring approximately 30 additional operative minutes per nipple. Immediate nipple reconstruction utilizing the DIEP flap can be a cost‐effective and feasible technique for recreating a natural‐appearing and aesthetic nipple in select patients. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2013.
- 18 August 2012
- Published by Wiley in Microsurgery
- Vol. 33 (2) , 125-129
Immediate nipple reconstruction utilizing the DIEP flap in areola‐sparing mastectomy
The surgical treatment of breast cancer has dramatically evolved over the past decade toward an approach combining oncologic safety with aesthetic outcomes. The skin‐sparing mastectomy initiated this paradigm shift amongst breast surgeons and can be oncologically safe, in some cases sparing both the areola and the nipple. In accordance with the emphasis on aesthetics, some general surgeons have adopted new methods of resecting only the nipple, sparing the areola in select patients. The superior aesthetic results, durability, and decreased donor site morbidity of perforator flaps have brought autologous reconstruction back to the forefront of breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap as the gold standard. We describe a technique utilizing the DIEP flap skin paddle for immediate nipple reconstruction at the time of mastectomy and reconstruction, eliminating the need for delayed reconstruction and limiting donor site morbidity by concealing the donor site below the mastectomy skin flaps. In the six cases described performed between 2010 and 2012 (mean with 53 years; range 46–59 years), there have been no complications to the flap or the nipple postoperatively, nor has there been a need for further nipple revisions for 6 months. The nipple position relative to the flap breast mound has remained unchanged for up to 6 months. The immediate nipple reconstruction does not significantly lengthen operative time, requiring approximately 30 additional operative minutes per nipple. Immediate nipple reconstruction utilizing the DIEP flap can be a cost‐effective and feasible technique for recreating a natural‐appearing and aesthetic nipple in select patients. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2013.
- 22 March 2012
- Published by Wiley in Microsurgery
- Vol. 32 (4) , 334-335
Venous thromboembolism risk factors in breast cancer patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction
- 22 March 2012
- Published by Wiley in Microsurgery
- Vol. 32 (4) , 334-335
Venous thromboembolism risk factors in breast cancer patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction