Rachel Lentz
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Rachel Lentz has a total of 20 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Stephanie Kwei
Department of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
3 shared publications - Ajul Shah
The Center for Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery at the Institute for Advanced Reconstruction, Freehold, NJ
2 shared publications Alexander F. Au
Yale University New Haven, Conn
2 shared publicationsAlexander Au
Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
1 shared publicationChristopher C. M.D. Ross
Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery (Lentz, Craig)
1 shared publication- E. Stirling Craig
Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery (Lentz, Craig)
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 October 2016
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 138 (4) , 781e-783e
A Comparison of Superomedial versus Inferior Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty Using Three-Dimensional Analysis
- 1 October 2016
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 138 (4) , 781e-783e
A Comparison of Superomedial versus Inferior Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty Using Three-Dimensional Analysis
- Open Access
- 20 September 2016
- Published by OAE Publishing Inc. in Plastic and Aesthetic Research
- Vol. 3 (9) , 284
A mammometric comparison of modified Robertson versus Wise pattern inferior pedicle reduction mammoplasty
Keywords: 3D photography, mammometrics, modified Robertson, Wise pattern, reduction mammoplasty
- 20 September 2016
- Published by OAE Publishing Inc. in Plastic and Aesthetic Research
- Vol. 3 (9) , 284
Open AccessA mammometric comparison of modified Robertson versus Wise pattern inferior pedicle reduction mammoplasty
Keywords: 3D photography, mammometrics, modified Robertson, Wise pattern, reduction mammoplasty
- 1 April 2015
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 135 (4) , 1258
Abstract P98: Three Dimensional Analysis of PostOperative... : Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- 1 April 2015
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 135 (4) , 1258
Abstract P98: Three Dimensional Analysis of PostOperative... : Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- 1 September 2013
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Plastic Surgery
- Vol. 71 (3) , 269-273
Radiation Therapy and Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction
The optimal timing of expander-implant exchange in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) remains unclear with prior reports yielding inconsistent and variable results. The purpose of this study was to characterize complications associated with the sequencing of expander-implant breast reconstruction before or after PMRT and to compare the outcomes between early (4 months) expander-implant exchange in the subset of patients who received PMRT before exchange. The medical records of all patients PMRT in the setting of tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction between June 2004 and June 2011 at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were first classified as having undergone expander-implant exchange before the initiation of PMRT or after the completion of PMRT. Patients who underwent expander-implant exchange after PMRT were then classified as having undergone exchange early (4 months after PMRT). All complications requiring additional surgery or hospitalization were recorded. Fifty-five eligible patients were identified as having undergone 56 two-stage tissue expander-implant breast reconstructions. Twenty-two reconstructions underwent exchange before PMRT and 34 reconstructions underwent exchange after PMRT. There was no significant difference in overall complication rate (54.55% vs 47.06%, P = 0.785) or reconstruction failure rate (13.64% vs 20.59%, P = 0.724) between the 2 cohorts. Twenty reconstructions underwent exchange less than 4 months after PMRT and 14 underwent exchange more than 4 months after PMRT. There was no significant difference in overall complication rate (40% vs 57.14%, P = 0.487) or failure rate (25% vs 14.29%, P = 0.672) between the 2 groups. Trends suggest a higher rate of infection in patients who underwent exchange earlier (30% vs 14.29%, P = 0.422) and a higher rate of capsular contracture in patients who underwent exchange later (5% vs 21.43%, P = 0.283); however, statistical significance was not reached. Our findings suggest that neither the sequencing nor timing of expander-implant exchange in the setting of PMRT affects overall complication or reconstruction failure rate. However, the timing of exchange may impact the type of complication encountered. Further investigation is necessary to determine an optimal time for expander-implant exchange.
- 1 September 2013
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Plastic Surgery
- Vol. 71 (3) , 269-273
Radiation Therapy and Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction
The optimal timing of expander-implant exchange in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) remains unclear with prior reports yielding inconsistent and variable results. The purpose of this study was to characterize complications associated with the sequencing of expander-implant breast reconstruction before or after PMRT and to compare the outcomes between early (4 months) expander-implant exchange in the subset of patients who received PMRT before exchange. The medical records of all patients PMRT in the setting of tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction between June 2004 and June 2011 at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were first classified as having undergone expander-implant exchange before the initiation of PMRT or after the completion of PMRT. Patients who underwent expander-implant exchange after PMRT were then classified as having undergone exchange early (4 months after PMRT). All complications requiring additional surgery or hospitalization were recorded. Fifty-five eligible patients were identified as having undergone 56 two-stage tissue expander-implant breast reconstructions. Twenty-two reconstructions underwent exchange before PMRT and 34 reconstructions underwent exchange after PMRT. There was no significant difference in overall complication rate (54.55% vs 47.06%, P = 0.785) or reconstruction failure rate (13.64% vs 20.59%, P = 0.724) between the 2 cohorts. Twenty reconstructions underwent exchange less than 4 months after PMRT and 14 underwent exchange more than 4 months after PMRT. There was no significant difference in overall complication rate (40% vs 57.14%, P = 0.487) or failure rate (25% vs 14.29%, P = 0.672) between the 2 groups. Trends suggest a higher rate of infection in patients who underwent exchange earlier (30% vs 14.29%, P = 0.422) and a higher rate of capsular contracture in patients who underwent exchange later (5% vs 21.43%, P = 0.283); however, statistical significance was not reached. Our findings suggest that neither the sequencing nor timing of expander-implant exchange in the setting of PMRT affects overall complication or reconstruction failure rate. However, the timing of exchange may impact the type of complication encountered. Further investigation is necessary to determine an optimal time for expander-implant exchange.
- 1 November 2012
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 130 (5) , 772e-773e
Does the Left Hand Know What the Right Hand Is Doing? What Plastic Surgeons Need to Know about Radiation Therapy Techniques
- 1 November 2012
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 130 (5) , 772e-773e
Does the Left Hand Know What the Right Hand Is Doing? What Plastic Surgeons Need to Know about Radiation Therapy Techniques