Harald Zankl
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Harald Zankl has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aart Middeldorp
University of Innsbruck
6 shared publications - Nao Hirokawa
JAIST
4 shared publications - Bertram Felgenhauer
University of Innsbruck
2 shared publications - Julian Nagele
Queen Mary University of London
1 shared publication - Naoki Nishida
Nagoya University
1 shared publication - Takahito Aoto
RIEC, Tohoku University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 December 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Automated Reasoning
- Vol. 54 (2) , 101-133
Labelings for Decreasing Diagrams
- 17 December 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Automated Reasoning
- Vol. 54 (2) , 101-133
Open AccessLabelings for Decreasing Diagrams
- Open Access
Labelings for Decreasing Diagrams
This article is concerned with automating the decreasing diagrams technique of van Oostrom for establishing confluence of term rewrite systems. We study abstract criteria that allow to lexicographically combine labelings to show local diagrams decreasing. This approach has two immediate benefits. First, it allows to use labelings for linear rewrite systems also for left-linear ones, provided some mild conditions are satisfied. Second, it admits an incremental method for proving confluence which subsumes recent developments in automating decreasing diagrams. The techniques proposed in the article have been implemented and experimental results demonstrate how, e.g., the rule labeling benefits from our contributions.
Open AccessLabelings for Decreasing Diagrams
This article is concerned with automating the decreasing diagrams technique of van Oostrom for establishing confluence of term rewrite systems. We study abstract criteria that allow to lexicographically combine labelings to show local diagrams decreasing. This approach has two immediate benefits. First, it allows to use labelings for linear rewrite systems also for left-linear ones, provided some mild conditions are satisfied. Second, it admits an incremental method for proving confluence which subsumes recent developments in automating decreasing diagrams. The techniques proposed in the article have been implemented and experimental results demonstrate how, e.g., the rule labeling benefits from our contributions.
- 25 April 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Automated Reasoning
- Vol. 50 (3) , 279-315
Uncurrying for Termination and Complexity
- 25 April 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Automated Reasoning
- Vol. 50 (3) , 279-315
Uncurrying for Termination and Complexity
- Open Access
- 17 February 2011
- Published by Open Publishing Association in Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
- Vol. 49, 46-57
Uncurrying for Innermost Termination and Derivational Complexity
First-order applicative term rewriting systems provide a natural framework for modeling higher-order aspects. In earlier work we introduced an uncurrying transformation which is termination preserving and reflecting. In this paper we investigate how this transformation behaves for innermost termination and (innermost) derivational complexity. We prove that it reflects innermost termination and innermost derivational complexity and that it preserves and reflects polynomial derivational complexity. For the preservation of innermost termination and innermost derivational complexity we give counterexamples. Hence uncurrying may be used as a preprocessing transformation for innermost termination proofs and establishing polynomial upper and lower bounds on the derivational complexity. Additionally it may be used to establish upper bounds on the innermost derivational complexity while it neither is sound for proving innermost non-termination nor for obtaining lower bounds on the innermost derivational complexity.Comment: In Proceedings HOR 2010, arXiv:1102.346
- 17 February 2011
- Published by Open Publishing Association in Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
- Vol. 49, 46-57
Open AccessUncurrying for Innermost Termination and Derivational Complexity
First-order applicative term rewriting systems provide a natural framework for modeling higher-order aspects. In earlier work we introduced an uncurrying transformation which is termination preserving and reflecting. In this paper we investigate how this transformation behaves for innermost termination and (innermost) derivational complexity. We prove that it reflects innermost termination and innermost derivational complexity and that it preserves and reflects polynomial derivational complexity. For the preservation of innermost termination and innermost derivational complexity we give counterexamples. Hence uncurrying may be used as a preprocessing transformation for innermost termination proofs and establishing polynomial upper and lower bounds on the derivational complexity. Additionally it may be used to establish upper bounds on the innermost derivational complexity while it neither is sound for proving innermost non-termination nor for obtaining lower bounds on the innermost derivational complexity.Comment: In Proceedings HOR 2010, arXiv:1102.346
- 1 May 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
- Vol. 56 (1) , 87-108
Increasing interpretations
- 1 May 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
- Vol. 56 (1) , 87-108
Increasing interpretations
- 23 April 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Automated Reasoning
- Vol. 43 (2) , 173-201
KBO Orientability
- 23 April 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Automated Reasoning
- Vol. 43 (2) , 173-201
KBO Orientability