Aart Middeldorp

We report on the new ARI infrastructure that supports tools and competitions in term rewriting. It offers ARI-COPS, a database for confluence problems and competition results, and ARIWeb, a convenient web interface for tools that participate in the annual confluence competition. These are built on top of the new ARI format for rewrite systems, a format converter, certifiers for competition results, and a duplicate checker.

We present a sound and complete unification procedure for deterministic higher-order patterns, a class of simply-typed lambda terms introduced by Yokoyama et al. which comes with a deterministic matching problem. Our unification procedure can be seen as a special case of full higher-order unification where flex-flex pairs can be solved in a most general way. Moreover, our method generalizes Libal and Miller’s recent functions-as-constructors higher-order unification (FCU) by dropping their global restriction on variable arguments, thereby losing the property that every solvable problem has a most general unifier. In fact, minimal complete sets of unifiers of deterministic higher-order patterns may be infinite, so decidability of the unification problem remains an open question.

We present a new encoding of the Battle of Hercules and Hydra as a rewrite system with AC symbols. Unlike earlier term rewriting encodings, it faithfully models any strategy of Hercules to beat Hydra. To prove the termination of our encoding, we employ type introduction in connection with many-sorted semantic labeling for AC rewriting and AC-MPO, a new AC compatible reduction order that can be seen as a much weakened version of AC-RPO.

We lift the computability path order and its extensions from plain higher-order rewriting to higher-order rewriting on beta-eta-normal forms where matching modulo beta-eta is employed. The resulting order NCPO is shown to be useful on practical examples. In particular, it can handle systems where its cousin NHORPO fails even when it is used together with the powerful transformation technique of neutralization. We also argue that automating NCPO efficiently is straightforward using SAT/SMT solvers whereas this cannot be said about the transformation technique of neutralization. Our prototype implementation supports automatic termination proof search for NCPO and is also the first one to automate NHORPO with neutralization.

We present , a tool for automatically proving (non-) confluence and termination of logically constrained rewrite systems. We compare to other tools for logically constrained rewriting. Extensive experiments demonstrate the promise of .

We revisit completion modulo equational theories for left-linear term rewrite systems where unification modulo the theory is avoided and the normal rewrite relation can be used in order to decide validity questions. To that end, we give a new correctness proof for finite runs and establish a simulation result between the two inference systems known from the literature. Given a concrete reduction order, novel canonicity results show that the resulting complete systems are unique up to the representation of their rules' right-hand sides. Furthermore, we show how left-linear AC completion can be simulated by general AC completion. In particular, this result allows us to switch from the former to the latter at any point during a completion process.

We report on the formalization of a sufficient condition for confluence of first-order left-linear rewrite systems within the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL. This criterion, originally proposed by Okui (1998), is based on simultaneous critical pairs, which finitely represent peaks consisting of a multi-step and a normal step. It properly subsumes the formalized result on development-closed critical pairs.

By means of a simple reduction from Hilbert's 10th problem we prove the somewhat surprising result that termination of one-rule rewrite systems by a linear interpretation in the natural numbers is undecidable. The very same reduction also shows the undecidability of termination of one-rule rewrite systems using the Knuth-Bendix order with subterm coefficients. The linear termination problem remains undecidable for one-rule rewrite systems that can be shown terminating by a (non-linear) polynomial interpretation. We further show the undecidability of the problem whether a one-rule rewrite system can be shown terminating by a polynomial interpretation with rational or real coefficients. Several of our results have been formally verified in the Isabelle/HOL proof assistant.

We show that (local) confluence of terminating logically constrained rewrite systems is undecidable, even when the underlying theory is decidable. Several confluence criteria for logically constrained rewrite systems are known. These were obtained by replaying existing proofs for plain term rewrite systems in a constrained setting, involving a non-trivial effort. We present a simple transformation from logically constrained rewrite systems to term rewrite systems such that critical pairs of the latter correspond to constrained critical pairs of the former. The usefulness of the transformation is illustrated by lifting the advanced confluence results based on (almost) development closed critical pairs as well as on parallel critical pairs to the constrained setting.