D. P. Smith
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
D. P. Smith has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- D. L. Fletcher
† Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2772
2 shared publications J. A. Cason
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Richard B. Russell Research Center, Athens, GA 30605
2 shared publicationsA. Hinton
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Richard B. Russell Research Center, Athens, GA 30605
1 shared publicationC. M. Papa
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, Athens, Georgia 30613
1 shared publicationC.M. Papa
USDA Agricultural Research Service Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center Athens, GA 30613
1 shared publicationD. L. Fletcher
† University of Georgia, Department of Poultry Science, Athens 30602
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 August 2008
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 87 (8) , 1659-1661
Effect of Blood Spots in Table Egg Albumen on Salmonella Growth
- 1 August 2008
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 87 (8) , 1659-1661
Open AccessEffect of Blood Spots in Table Egg Albumen on Salmonella Growth
- Open Access
- 1 December 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 86 (12) , 2666-2670
Marination Pressure and Phosphate Effects on Broiler Breast Fillet Yield, Tenderness, and Color
- 1 December 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 86 (12) , 2666-2670
Open AccessMarination Pressure and Phosphate Effects on Broiler Breast Fillet Yield, Tenderness, and Color
- Open Access
- 1 July 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 86 (7) , 1436-1439
Evaluation of Carcass Scraping to Enumerate Bacteria on Prechill Broiler Carcasses
Experiments were conducted to evaluate a scraping method for enumerating bacteria on broiler carcasses. In experiment 1, coliforms and Escherichia coli were determined by the whole-carcass rinse (WCR) method and by scraping the skin surface and rinsing the blade (BR). In each of 2 replicate trials, 4 prechill broiler carcasses were collected from 2 different commercial processing plants. The WCR method was conducted on each carcass, then a blunt edge blade was used to scrape an area measuring approximately 80 cm2 of the breast (front) skin and on the back of the carcass. After scraping, each blade and adhering residue was rinsed in 30 mL of 0.1% peptone. One milliliter of rinsate each from the WCR and BR was plated to determine total coliforms and E. coli. In experiment 2, 6 carcasses were collected from a processing plant in each of 2 replicate trials. Carcasses were split, with one half scraped on all skin surfaces, and the other half remaining unscraped as a control; all halves were then subjected to half-carcass rinses using 200 mL of 0.1% peptone. Coliforms and E. coli were enumerated. Results from both experiments are reported as log cfu/mL. In experiment 1, mean coliform WCR counts (5.1) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than back BR (2.8), which were higher than front BR (2.2). Mean E. coli WCR counts (4.5) were higher than back BR (2.4), which were higher than front BR (1.6). The counts for BR adjusted for the greater surface area sampled by WCR were still lower than the WCR counts. Experiment 2 results showed no difference between control and scraped carcass halves for coliforms (4.7) or E. coli (4.6). Overall, results showed that scraping either prior to or after rinsing did not increase enumeration of coliforms or E. coli. Scraping could be a viable method to compare the numbers of bacteria on different areas of the same carcass.
- 1 July 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 86 (7) , 1436-1439
Open AccessEvaluation of Carcass Scraping to Enumerate Bacteria on Prechill Broiler Carcasses
Experiments were conducted to evaluate a scraping method for enumerating bacteria on broiler carcasses. In experiment 1, coliforms and Escherichia coli were determined by the whole-carcass rinse (WCR) method and by scraping the skin surface and rinsing the blade (BR). In each of 2 replicate trials, 4 prechill broiler carcasses were collected from 2 different commercial processing plants. The WCR method was conducted on each carcass, then a blunt edge blade was used to scrape an area measuring approximately 80 cm2 of the breast (front) skin and on the back of the carcass. After scraping, each blade and adhering residue was rinsed in 30 mL of 0.1% peptone. One milliliter of rinsate each from the WCR and BR was plated to determine total coliforms and E. coli. In experiment 2, 6 carcasses were collected from a processing plant in each of 2 replicate trials. Carcasses were split, with one half scraped on all skin surfaces, and the other half remaining unscraped as a control; all halves were then subjected to half-carcass rinses using 200 mL of 0.1% peptone. Coliforms and E. coli were enumerated. Results from both experiments are reported as log cfu/mL. In experiment 1, mean coliform WCR counts (5.1) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than back BR (2.8), which were higher than front BR (2.2). Mean E. coli WCR counts (4.5) were higher than back BR (2.4), which were higher than front BR (1.6). The counts for BR adjusted for the greater surface area sampled by WCR were still lower than the WCR counts. Experiment 2 results showed no difference between control and scraped carcass halves for coliforms (4.7) or E. coli (4.6). Overall, results showed that scraping either prior to or after rinsing did not increase enumeration of coliforms or E. coli. Scraping could be a viable method to compare the numbers of bacteria on different areas of the same carcass.
- Open Access
- 1 June 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 86 (6) , 1241-1244
Effect of External or Internal Fecal Contamination on Numbers of Bacteria on Prechilled Broiler Carcasses
During processing, fecal material may contact broiler carcasses externally or internally. A study was conducted to determine the effect of external vs. internal fecal contamination on numbers of bacteria on broiler carcasses. In each of 3 trials, 12 carcasses just prior to evisceration were obtained from a commercial processing plant, placed on a shackle line, and eviscerated with commercial equipment in a pilot scale processing plant. Also, approximately 20 intestinal tracts were collected from the processing plant; then cecal contents were collected and pooled. One gram of cecal content was placed on the exterior breast skin (external), inside the carcass cavity (internal), or not applied (control). All carcasses were held 10 min, then placed on the shackle line and passed through a commercial inside-outside bird washer set at 552 kPa, 5 s dwell time, using approximately 189 L per min of tap water at ambient temperature. After a 1-min drip, whole carcass rinses were conducted on each carcass, and coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter counts were determined and reported as log cfu/mL of rinse. External carcass contamination resulted in significantly higher (P < 0.05) coliform, E. coli, and Campylobacter numbers than internal contamination (5.0 vs. 4.5, 4.9 vs. 4.2, and 3.6 vs. 2.6, respectively). Control carcass counts were significantly lower than external or internal carcass contamination counts for coliforms (3.7), E. coli (3.6), and Campylobacter (2.2). External contamination resulted in higher numbers of bacteria after carcass washing, but carcasses with internal contamination still have higher numbers of bacteria after washing than carcasses without applied contamination.
- 1 June 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 86 (6) , 1241-1244
Open AccessEffect of External or Internal Fecal Contamination on Numbers of Bacteria on Prechilled Broiler Carcasses
During processing, fecal material may contact broiler carcasses externally or internally. A study was conducted to determine the effect of external vs. internal fecal contamination on numbers of bacteria on broiler carcasses. In each of 3 trials, 12 carcasses just prior to evisceration were obtained from a commercial processing plant, placed on a shackle line, and eviscerated with commercial equipment in a pilot scale processing plant. Also, approximately 20 intestinal tracts were collected from the processing plant; then cecal contents were collected and pooled. One gram of cecal content was placed on the exterior breast skin (external), inside the carcass cavity (internal), or not applied (control). All carcasses were held 10 min, then placed on the shackle line and passed through a commercial inside-outside bird washer set at 552 kPa, 5 s dwell time, using approximately 189 L per min of tap water at ambient temperature. After a 1-min drip, whole carcass rinses were conducted on each carcass, and coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter counts were determined and reported as log cfu/mL of rinse. External carcass contamination resulted in significantly higher (P < 0.05) coliform, E. coli, and Campylobacter numbers than internal contamination (5.0 vs. 4.5, 4.9 vs. 4.2, and 3.6 vs. 2.6, respectively). Control carcass counts were significantly lower than external or internal carcass contamination counts for coliforms (3.7), E. coli (3.6), and Campylobacter (2.2). External contamination resulted in higher numbers of bacteria after carcass washing, but carcasses with internal contamination still have higher numbers of bacteria after washing than carcasses without applied contamination.
- Open Access
- 1 January 1992
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 71 (1) , 197-202
Duckling and Chicken Processing Yields and Breast Meat Tenderness
- 1 January 1992
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 71 (1) , 197-202
Open AccessDuckling and Chicken Processing Yields and Breast Meat Tenderness
- 1 October 1991
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Muscle Foods
- Vol. 2 (4) , 305-310
EVALUATION OF DUCKLING BREAST MEAT SUBJECTED TO DIFFERENT METHODS OF FURTHER PROCESSING AND COOKING
- 1 October 1991
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Muscle Foods
- Vol. 2 (4) , 305-310
EVALUATION OF DUCKLING BREAST MEAT SUBJECTED TO DIFFERENT METHODS OF FURTHER PROCESSING AND COOKING