Nien-Tsu Tuan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Nien-Tsu Tuan has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ian Jay
University of Cape Town
3 shared publications - Mark Massyn
Department of Construction Economics and Management, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
2 shared publications - Bonga Ntshangase
University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
1 shared publication Corrinne Shaw
1 shared publication- Corrinne Shaw
University of Cape Town
1 shared publication Ian Jay
World Vision Lesotho
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 9 August 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 35 (3) , 441-452
The Other Side of Success Factors—A Systemic Methodology for Exploring Critical Success Factors
- 9 August 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 35 (3) , 441-452
The Other Side of Success Factors—A Systemic Methodology for Exploring Critical Success Factors
- Open Access
- 3 April 2020
- Published by EDP Sciences in MATEC Web of Conferences
- Vol. 312, 01004
Identifying Critical Success Factors through Interactive Management
Since its inception, the Critical Success Factor (CSF) concept has been increasingly adopted by industries to achieve business goals. However, the conventional approaches used for identifying critical success factors are underpinned by the mechanism paradigm. The mechanism paradigm doesn’t take the interlaced relationships between system elements into account. Neither does it promote interaction between the relevant stakeholders. This paper proposes a systemic approach called Interactive Management (IM) to complement conventional ideas in determining the critical success factors. The Interactive Management process embraces the relevant stakeholders to collectively identify the critical success factors through four phases: generating critical success factors, clarifying the generated critical success factors, structuring a systemic digraph showing the interlaced relationships between the critical success factors, and identifying the real critical success factors in the systemic digraph. An example is provided to demonstrate how the Interactive Management methodology can be used to identify the real critical success factors.
- 3 April 2020
- Published by EDP Sciences in MATEC Web of Conferences
- Vol. 312, 01004
Open AccessIdentifying Critical Success Factors through Interactive Management
Since its inception, the Critical Success Factor (CSF) concept has been increasingly adopted by industries to achieve business goals. However, the conventional approaches used for identifying critical success factors are underpinned by the mechanism paradigm. The mechanism paradigm doesn’t take the interlaced relationships between system elements into account. Neither does it promote interaction between the relevant stakeholders. This paper proposes a systemic approach called Interactive Management (IM) to complement conventional ideas in determining the critical success factors. The Interactive Management process embraces the relevant stakeholders to collectively identify the critical success factors through four phases: generating critical success factors, clarifying the generated critical success factors, structuring a systemic digraph showing the interlaced relationships between the critical success factors, and identifying the real critical success factors in the systemic digraph. An example is provided to demonstrate how the Interactive Management methodology can be used to identify the real critical success factors.
- 8 January 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 33 (1) , 77-93
A Systemic Exploration of the Risk Factors in Zimbabwean Information Technology Projects
- 8 January 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 33 (1) , 77-93
A Systemic Exploration of the Risk Factors in Zimbabwean Information Technology Projects
- 2 September 2019
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
- Vol. 12 (3) , 808-824
A systemic inquiry into the delay factors in South African electrical distribution projects
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the delay factors in South African electrical distribution projects and demonstrate the interlaced relationship between the identified project delay factors.Design/methodology/approach: This research employs interactive management (IM) methodology to construct a model achieving the research purpose. The IM methodology is anchored in the soft systems thinking. Its inquiry process mainly comprises four phases: idea generation, idea clarification, idea structuring and interpretation of the structured ideas. The IM methodology allows the relevant stakeholders to collaboratively develop a digraph displaying the interrelationship among the system elements.Findings: The participants of the IM session structured a systemic model showing that a loop comprising three factors is the driver leading to the delays in the electrical distribution projects. The three delay factors in the loop are “poor communication”, “poor planning” and “project scheduling not properly done”.Originality/value: The findings show that a loop comprising three delay factors is the driver leading to the project delays. This result is different from the outputs of the commonly used approaches. The three identified root causes serve as the starting point for eradicating delays in the electrical distribution projects.
- 2 September 2019
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
- Vol. 12 (3) , 808-824
A systemic inquiry into the delay factors in South African electrical distribution projects
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the delay factors in South African electrical distribution projects and demonstrate the interlaced relationship between the identified project delay factors.Design/methodology/approach: This research employs interactive management (IM) methodology to construct a model achieving the research purpose. The IM methodology is anchored in the soft systems thinking. Its inquiry process mainly comprises four phases: idea generation, idea clarification, idea structuring and interpretation of the structured ideas. The IM methodology allows the relevant stakeholders to collaboratively develop a digraph displaying the interrelationship among the system elements.Findings: The participants of the IM session structured a systemic model showing that a loop comprising three factors is the driver leading to the delays in the electrical distribution projects. The three delay factors in the loop are “poor communication”, “poor planning” and “project scheduling not properly done”.Originality/value: The findings show that a loop comprising three delay factors is the driver leading to the project delays. This result is different from the outputs of the commonly used approaches. The three identified root causes serve as the starting point for eradicating delays in the electrical distribution projects.
- 15 November 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 31 (4) , 421-435
A Systemic Inquiry into the AIDS Epidemic in the Western Cape of South Africa through Interactive Management
- 15 November 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 31 (4) , 421-435
A Systemic Inquiry into the AIDS Epidemic in the Western Cape of South Africa through Interactive Management
- 2 August 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 30 (3) , 257-276
A Systemic Exploration of Lesotho’s Basic Education through Interactive Management
- 2 August 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 30 (3) , 257-276
A Systemic Exploration of Lesotho’s Basic Education through Interactive Management
- 2 September 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 29 (2) , 173-182
The Mind Could Accommodate Inconsistencies
- 2 September 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 29 (2) , 173-182
The Mind Could Accommodate Inconsistencies
- 20 June 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 29 (1) , 51-60
Consideration of Ethics in Systemic Thinking
- 20 June 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Systemic Practice and Action Research
- Vol. 29 (1) , 51-60
Consideration of Ethics in Systemic Thinking
- 26 November 2014
- Published by Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM)
Applying the Lens of Complexity Theory to Project Management
- 26 November 2014
- Published by Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM)
Applying the Lens of Complexity Theory to Project Management