Lu Chen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Lu Chen has a total of 45 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Yuanmei (Elly) Qu
Rohrer College of Business, Rowan University, Glassboro, USA
4 shared publications - Kwame Ansong Wadei
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Department of Human Resource and Organizational Development
3 shared publications - Shen Ye
School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
3 shared publications - Yilin Xiang
Zhejiang University Hangzhou China
3 shared publications Baiyin Yang
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
2 shared publications- Gerema Alemayehu Bekele
School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 4 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Psychology
- Vol. 45 (13)
Uncovering the impacts of responsible leadership on employee whistleblowing intentions: A self-determination perspective
- 4 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Psychology
- Vol. 45 (13)
Uncovering the impacts of responsible leadership on employee whistleblowing intentions: A self-determination perspective
- 25 April 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Business Research
- Vol. 212
Deciphering pressure signals: a cross-level model of performance pressure transmission from team leaders to team members
- 25 April 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Business Research
- Vol. 212
Deciphering pressure signals: a cross-level model of performance pressure transmission from team leaders to team members
- Open Access
- 21 October 2025
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Organizational Behavior
Avoiding Moral Divergence: A Self‐Verification Perspective on Why and When Team Ethical Conflict Inhibits Individual Ethical Voice
Although contextual factors have been shown to facilitate ethical voice, research on team‐level antecedents that may inhibit it has been limited. Drawing on self‐verification theory, we develop a multilevel moderation–mediation model that examines how team ethical conflict inhibits individual ethical voice. Ethical self‐verification perception is identified as a mediator and team independence climate as a moderator. Results from a time lagged study of 235 employees working in 58 teams in seven Chinese organizations show that team ethical conflict has a cross‐level influence on individual ethical voice, mediated by ethical self‐verification perception. Moreover, team independence climate amplifies the negative effect of team ethical conflict on ethical self‐verification perception and its indirect negative effect on individual ethical voice. These findings offer theoretical and managerial implications for ethical conflict and voice research.
- 21 October 2025
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Organizational Behavior
Open AccessAvoiding Moral Divergence: A Self‐Verification Perspective on Why and When Team Ethical Conflict Inhibits Individual Ethical Voice
Although contextual factors have been shown to facilitate ethical voice, research on team‐level antecedents that may inhibit it has been limited. Drawing on self‐verification theory, we develop a multilevel moderation–mediation model that examines how team ethical conflict inhibits individual ethical voice. Ethical self‐verification perception is identified as a mediator and team independence climate as a moderator. Results from a time lagged study of 235 employees working in 58 teams in seven Chinese organizations show that team ethical conflict has a cross‐level influence on individual ethical voice, mediated by ethical self‐verification perception. Moreover, team independence climate amplifies the negative effect of team ethical conflict on ethical self‐verification perception and its indirect negative effect on individual ethical voice. These findings offer theoretical and managerial implications for ethical conflict and voice research.
- 17 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business Ethics
- Vol. 206 (1) , 157-179
The Ethical Dilemma of Organization Norm and Ideology: Investigating Why and When Guanxi HRM Practice Predicts Unethical Pro-Leader Behavior
- 17 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business Ethics
- Vol. 206 (1) , 157-179
The Ethical Dilemma of Organization Norm and Ideology: Investigating Why and When Guanxi HRM Practice Predicts Unethical Pro-Leader Behavior
- 10 January 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business and Psychology
- Vol. 40 (5) , 1077-1092
The Downside of Ethical Convictions: Why and When Employees Reduce Ethical Voice in Response to Perceived Supervisor Ethical Conviction
- 10 January 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business and Psychology
- Vol. 40 (5) , 1077-1092
The Downside of Ethical Convictions: Why and When Employees Reduce Ethical Voice in Response to Perceived Supervisor Ethical Conviction
- 28 March 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business Ethics
- Vol. 195 (3) , 537-561
Demystifying Benevolent Leadership: When Subordinates Feel Obligated to Undertake Illegitimate Tasks
- 28 March 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business Ethics
- Vol. 195 (3) , 537-561
Demystifying Benevolent Leadership: When Subordinates Feel Obligated to Undertake Illegitimate Tasks
- 28 July 2023
- Published by Wiley in Applied Psychology
- Vol. 73 (2) , 622-647
The initiative paradox: A social comparison perspective on why and when relational crafting leads to loneliness
Drawing upon social comparison theory, we investigated the influencing mechanism between relational job crafting and workplace loneliness and its boundary condition. A multiple‐source, multi‐wave field study was conducted with data collected from 267 employee–peer dyads in three Chinese firms. The results showed that there is an inverted U‐shaped relationship between promotion‐oriented relational crafting and loneliness via peer social undermining. Meanwhile, prevention‐oriented relational crafting is positively related to loneliness through peer social undermining. Moreover, impression management motive moderates the inverted U‐shaped relationship between promotion‐oriented relational crafting and peer social undermining. Implications of these findings are discussed.
- 28 July 2023
- Published by Wiley in Applied Psychology
- Vol. 73 (2) , 622-647
The initiative paradox: A social comparison perspective on why and when relational crafting leads to loneliness
Drawing upon social comparison theory, we investigated the influencing mechanism between relational job crafting and workplace loneliness and its boundary condition. A multiple‐source, multi‐wave field study was conducted with data collected from 267 employee–peer dyads in three Chinese firms. The results showed that there is an inverted U‐shaped relationship between promotion‐oriented relational crafting and loneliness via peer social undermining. Meanwhile, prevention‐oriented relational crafting is positively related to loneliness through peer social undermining. Moreover, impression management motive moderates the inverted U‐shaped relationship between promotion‐oriented relational crafting and peer social undermining. Implications of these findings are discussed.