Juan Mao

The plant 26S proteasome is itself a regulatory target. Its abundance, composition, activity, and subcellular localisation are dynamically modulated by the very signalling pathways whose components or regulatory proteins it degrades. In this review, we draw on recent advances across immunity, abiotic stress, hormone signalling, organelle communication, and the proteasome's interplay with autophagy, together with the non-proteolytic functions of the 19S regulatory particle and apoplastic proteasomes, to establish the proteasome as a hub of regulatory plasticity. We argue that the proteasome operates not as a static degradation machine but as a proteolytic resource whose allocation across assembly states, subcellular compartments, and degradation pathways is continuously reconfigured. The central regulatory decision is therefore not which substrate is degraded, but how proteolytic capacity itself is distributed. This regulatory plasticity, and the nodes that mediate it, may inform the development of strategies to enhance proteolytic capacity for crop resilience.

The unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling pathway is activated by the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and stimulates the production of ER chaperones to restore ER proteostasis. However, how UPR-induced proteins return to their pre-stress levels upon removal of ER stress remains unknown. TUNICAMYCIN-INDUCED 1 (TIN1) is an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) protein that is normally expressed in pollen but is rapidly induced by ER stress in vegetative tissues. Here, we show that the ER-stress-induced TIN1 is rapidly degraded in the UPR recovery phase. We found that TIN1 degradation depends on its asparagine-linked glycans and requires both EMS-mutagenized bri1 suppressor 5 (EBS5) and EBS6 for its recruitment to the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) complex. Loss-of-function mutations in the core component of this Arabidopsis ERAD complex greatly stabilize TIN1. Interestingly, 2 other UPR-induced proteins that are coexpressed with TIN1 remained stable upon ER-stress removal, suggesting that rapid degradation during the stress-recovery phase likely applies to a subset of UPR-induced proteins. Further investigation is needed to uncover the mechanisms by which the ERAD machinery selectively degrades UPR-induced ER proteins.

Brassinosteroids (BRs) are essential phytohormones that orchestrate various stages of plant growth and development. The BR signaling cascade is mediated through a phosphorylation network involving sequential activation of the plasma membrane-localized receptor kinase Brassinosteroid-Insensitive 1 (BRI1), the cytoplasmic kinase Brassinosteroid-Insensitive 2 (BIN2), and the transcription factors BRI1-EMS suppressor 1 (BES1) and Brassinazole-Resistant 1 (BZR1). These transcription factors activate thousands of nuclear genes. Recent evidence highlights that ubiquitination has emerged as an equally pivotal mechanism that dynamically controls the BR signaling pathway by modulating the activity, subcellular localization, and protein stability of these core signaling components. In this review, we systematically analyze the central role of ubiquitination in determining the function, localization, and degradation of these proteins to fine-tune the outputs of BR signaling. We provide comparative perspectives on the functional conservation and divergence of ubiquitin-related regulatory components in the model plant Arabidopsis versus other plant species. Furthermore, we critically evaluate current knowledge gaps in the ubiquitin-mediated spatiotemporal control of BR signaling, offering insights into potential research directions to elucidate this sophisticated regulatory network.

Bri1-EMS Suppressor 1 (BES1) and Brassinazole Resistant 1 (BZR1) are two key transcription factors in the brassinosteroid (BR) signaling pathway, serving as crucial integrators that connect various signaling pathways in plants. Extensive genetic and biochemical studies have revealed that BES1 and BZR1, along with other protein factors, form a complex interaction network that governs plant growth, development, and stress tolerance. Among the interactome of BES1 and BZR1, several proteins involved in posttranslational modifications play a key role in modifying the stability, abundance, and transcriptional activity of BES1 and BZR1. This review specifically focuses on the functions and regulatory mechanisms of BES1 and BZR1 protein interactors that are not involved in the posttranslational modifications but are crucial in specific growth and development stages and stress responses. By highlighting the significance of the BZR1 and BES1 interactome, this review sheds light on how it optimizes plant growth, development, and stress responses.

Brassinosteroids (BRs) play vital roles in the plant life cycle and synthetic BRs are widely used to increase crop yield and plant stress tolerance. Among them are 24R-methyl-epibrassinolide (24-EBL) and 24S-ethyl-28-homobrassinolide (28-HBL), which differ from brassinolide (BL, the most active BR) at the C-24 position. Although it is well known that 24-EBL is 10% active as BL, there is no consensus on the bioactivity of 28-HBL. A recent outpouring of research interest in 28-HBL on major crops accompanied with a surge of industrial-scale synthesis that produces mixtures of active (22R,23R)-28-HBL and inactive (22S,23S)-28HBL, demands a standardized assay system capable of analyzing different synthetic “28-HBL” products. In this study, the relative bioactivity of 28-HBL to BL and 24-EBL, including its capacity to induce the well-established BR responses at molecular, biochemical, and physiological levels, was systematically analyzed using the whole seedlings of the wild-type and BR-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. These multi-level bioassays consistently showed that 28-HBL exhibits a much stronger bioactivity than 24-EBL and is almost as active as BL in rescuing the short hypocotyl phenotype of the dark-grown det2 mutant. These results are consistent with the previously established structure–activity relationship of BRs, proving that this multi-level whole seedling bioassay system could be used to analyze different batches of industrially produced 28-HBL or other BL analogs to ensure the full potential of BRs in modern agriculture.

The plant glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3)-like kinases are highly conserved protein serine/threonine kinases that are grouped into four subfamilies. Similar to their mammalian homologs, these kinases are constitutively active under normal growth conditions but become inactivated in response to diverse developmental and environmental signals. Since their initial discoveries in the early 1990s, many biochemical and genetic studies were performed to investigate their physiological functions in various plant species. These studies have demonstrated that the plant GSK3-like kinases are multifunctional kinases involved not only in a wide variety of plant growth and developmental processes but also in diverse plant stress responses. Here we summarize our current understanding of the versatile physiological functions of the plant GSK3-like kinases along with their confirmed and potential substrates.

Brassinosteroids (BRs) are important plant growth hormones that regulate a wide range of plant growth and developmental processes. The BR signals are perceived by two cell surface-localized receptor kinases, Brassinosteroid-Insensitive1 (BRI1) and BRI1-Associated receptor Kinase (BAK1), and reach the nucleus through two master transcription factors, bri1-EMS suppressor1 (BES1) and Brassinazole-resistant1 (BZR1). The intracellular transmission of the BR signals from BRI1/BAK1 to BES1/BZR1 is inhibited by a constitutively active kinase Brassinosteroid-Insensitive2 (BIN2) that phosphorylates and negatively regulates BES1/BZR1. Since their initial discoveries, further studies have revealed a plethora of biochemical and cellular mechanisms that regulate their protein abundance, subcellular localizations, and signaling activities. In this review, we provide a critical analysis of the current literature concerning activation, inactivation, and other regulatory mechanisms of three key kinases of the BR signaling cascade, BRI1, BAK1, and BIN2, and discuss some unresolved controversies and outstanding questions that require further investigation.

Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) is a unique mechanism to degrade misfolded proteins via complexes containing several highly-conserved ER-anchored ubiquitin ligases such as HMG-CoA reductase degradation1 (Hrd1). Arabidopsis has a similar Hrd1-containing ERAD machinery; however, our knowledge of this complex is limited. Here we report two closely-related Arabidopsis proteins, Protein Associated With Hrd1-1 (PAWH1) and PAWH2, which share a conserved domain with yeast Altered Inheritance of Mitochondria24. PAWH1 and PAWH2 localize to the ER membrane and associate with Hrd1 via EMS-mutagenized Bri1 Suppressor7 (EBS7), a plant-specific component of the Hrd1 complex. Simultaneously elimination of two PAWHs constitutively activates the unfolded protein response and compromises stress tolerance. Importantly, the pawh1 pawh2 double mutation reduces the protein abundance of EBS7 and Hrd1 and inhibits degradation of several ERAD substrates. Our study not only discovers additional plant-specific components of the Arabidopsis Hrd1 complex but also reveals a distinct mechanism for regulating the Hrd1 stability.