Malina Müller
Research Subjects
Malina Müller has a total of 26 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Andreas Pilz
Pfizer Corporation Austria GmbH, 1210 Vienna, Austria
2 shared publications - Claudius Malerczyk
Pfizer Pharma GmbH, 10117 Berlin, Germany
2 shared publications Dennis Ostwald
Wifor Institute, Rheinstraße 22, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany
2 shared publications- Hannah Lintener
WifOR Institute, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany
2 shared publications - Harish Madhava
Pfizer Ltd., Tadworth KT20 7 NY, UK
2 shared publications - Holly Yu
Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Correction: Müller et al. Does the Vaccination Against Tick-Borne Encephalitis Offer Good Value for Money for Incidence Rates Below the WHO Threshold for Endemicity? A Case Study for Germany. Vaccines 2024, 12, 1165
The authors would like to make the following corrections to this published paper [1]
Open AccessCorrection: Müller et al. Does the Vaccination Against Tick-Borne Encephalitis Offer Good Value for Money for Incidence Rates Below the WHO Threshold for Endemicity? A Case Study for Germany. Vaccines 2024, 12, 1165
The authors would like to make the following corrections to this published paper [1]
- Open Access
- 8 April 2025
- Published by Elsevier in eClinicalMedicine
- Vol. 82, 103180
Contribution of investment in health and cancer control to economic growth in Commonwealth countries
- 8 April 2025
- Published by Elsevier in eClinicalMedicine
- Vol. 82, 103180
Open AccessContribution of investment in health and cancer control to economic growth in Commonwealth countries
- Open Access
Does the Vaccination against Tick-Borne Encephalitis Offer Good Value for Money for Incidence Rates below the WHO Threshold for Endemicity? A Case Study for Germany
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral infection affecting the central nervous system (CNS) with potential long-term consequences including neurological sequelae. Vaccination is critical to reduce TBE morbidity and mortality, as no antiviral treatment is available. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines areas with an incidence of ≥5 cases/100,000 PPY as highly endemic and recommends that vaccination is offered to all individuals in these areas. However, access to TBE vaccination depends on recommendations and funding by national or subnational decision-makers. We assessed if TBE vaccination could offer good value for money at incidences below this threshold. Methods: A closed-cohort Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of TBE vaccination. We compared primary vaccination applied to the whole population (aged above 1 year) and to a subpopulation aged between 60 and 85 years to a scenario without vaccination. Since TBE incidence is often underestimated, we included under-ascertained TBE cases and non-CNS TBE infections. Germany was used as a case study due to the availability of detailed incidence data. Results: Our incidence threshold analysis showed that TBE vaccination offers good value for money well below the WHO threshold in most of the analyzed scenarios. Conclusions: Our results support a recommendation for TBE vaccination even in settings with low numbers of reported cases, especially for older patients. Furthermore, this analysis identified major research gaps regarding the costs, utilities, and clinical progression of TBE.
Open AccessDoes the Vaccination against Tick-Borne Encephalitis Offer Good Value for Money for Incidence Rates below the WHO Threshold for Endemicity? A Case Study for Germany
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral infection affecting the central nervous system (CNS) with potential long-term consequences including neurological sequelae. Vaccination is critical to reduce TBE morbidity and mortality, as no antiviral treatment is available. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines areas with an incidence of ≥5 cases/100,000 PPY as highly endemic and recommends that vaccination is offered to all individuals in these areas. However, access to TBE vaccination depends on recommendations and funding by national or subnational decision-makers. We assessed if TBE vaccination could offer good value for money at incidences below this threshold. Methods: A closed-cohort Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of TBE vaccination. We compared primary vaccination applied to the whole population (aged above 1 year) and to a subpopulation aged between 60 and 85 years to a scenario without vaccination. Since TBE incidence is often underestimated, we included under-ascertained TBE cases and non-CNS TBE infections. Germany was used as a case study due to the availability of detailed incidence data. Results: Our incidence threshold analysis showed that TBE vaccination offers good value for money well below the WHO threshold in most of the analyzed scenarios. Conclusions: Our results support a recommendation for TBE vaccination even in settings with low numbers of reported cases, especially for older patients. Furthermore, this analysis identified major research gaps regarding the costs, utilities, and clinical progression of TBE.
- Open Access
- 9 February 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Medical Economics
- Vol. 25 (1) , 220-229
The impact of omalizumab on paid and unpaid work productivity among severe Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP) patients
Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP) is a form of seasonal allergic rhinitis that affects 38.8% of the Japanese population. Particularly severe and most severe symptoms among JCP patients can lead to im...
- 9 February 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Medical Economics
- Vol. 25 (1) , 220-229
Open AccessThe impact of omalizumab on paid and unpaid work productivity among severe Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP) patients
Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP) is a form of seasonal allergic rhinitis that affects 38.8% of the Japanese population. Particularly severe and most severe symptoms among JCP patients can lead to im...
- 8 October 2018
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
- Vol. 19 (2) , 223-230
Long-term health benefits of stroke prevention with apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany: a population-based modelling study
Background: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) have a five times higher stroke risk. For more than 50 years, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the primary medication for stroke prevention. Apixaban, a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC), has demonstrated better efficacy and safety characteristics than the VKA warfarin in the ARISTOTLE trial. This study aims to quantify the potential societal effects of using apixaban instead of VKA in the German NVAF population from 2017 to 2030. Methods: Using an existing Markov model and a dynamic population approach, we modelled the health benefits of apixaban in patients with NVAF compared to VKA therapy in the German population from 2017 to 2030. Results: The results represent the extrapolated direct long-term health benefits of apixaban over VKA therapy for the German NVAF population. From 2017 until 2030, the use of apixaban instead of a VKA could avoid 52,185 major clinical events. This includes 15,383 non-fatal strokes or SEs, 22,483 non-fatal major bleeds, and 14,319 all-cause deaths, which correspond to 109,887 life years gained. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that using apixaban instead of VKA for stroke prevention can lead to considerable reduction in cardiovascular events.
- 8 October 2018
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
- Vol. 19 (2) , 223-230
Long-term health benefits of stroke prevention with apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany: a population-based modelling study
Background: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) have a five times higher stroke risk. For more than 50 years, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the primary medication for stroke prevention. Apixaban, a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC), has demonstrated better efficacy and safety characteristics than the VKA warfarin in the ARISTOTLE trial. This study aims to quantify the potential societal effects of using apixaban instead of VKA in the German NVAF population from 2017 to 2030. Methods: Using an existing Markov model and a dynamic population approach, we modelled the health benefits of apixaban in patients with NVAF compared to VKA therapy in the German population from 2017 to 2030. Results: The results represent the extrapolated direct long-term health benefits of apixaban over VKA therapy for the German NVAF population. From 2017 until 2030, the use of apixaban instead of a VKA could avoid 52,185 major clinical events. This includes 15,383 non-fatal strokes or SEs, 22,483 non-fatal major bleeds, and 14,319 all-cause deaths, which correspond to 109,887 life years gained. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that using apixaban instead of VKA for stroke prevention can lead to considerable reduction in cardiovascular events.