Mark Tacey

The Northern Patient Watch (NPW) program aimed to reduce hospital resource use by providing proactive support through peer health navigators working alongside health professionals. This study assessed the impact of NPW on hospital admissions, bed-days, emergency department presentations, and outpatient non-attendance rates, compared to propensity score-matched controls. A propensity score matching design compared NPW enrolees with controls over 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up periods. Hospital resource utilisation was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes including outpatient appointment non-attendance rates. Statistical methods addressed both normally and non-normally distributed variables. NPW enrolees used fewer hospital bed-days at all time points compared to matched controls, with the greatest effect at 12 months (median 2.00 [CI 0.00, 8.00] vs. 4.00 [CI 1.00, 14.00]). Admissions were significantly lower at all time points, halving at 12 months (median 1.00 [CI 0.00, 4.00] vs. 2.00 [CI 1.00, 4.00]). Emergency presentations were lower in the NPW group but not statistically significant. Outpatient non-attendance rates were significantly reduced (12 months: 44.8% vs. 55.6%), showing improved healthcare engagement. The NPW programme reduced admissions, bed-days, and outpatient non-attendance, suggesting peer health navigators supported by health professionals improve resource use and patient engagement.

Introduction The COVID‐19 pandemic demanded a rapid response within Radiation Oncology services to minimise the risk of infection to patients and workforce. This study aimed to assess whether the operational changes put in place to reduce infection risks were effective in engaging and supporting staff. Methods Our service’s response saw staff and patients split into morning or afternoon shifts without overlap. Changes included extended clinic hours, modified treatment regimens, expanded online/electronic communication and remote working. Staff were invited to respond to an electronic questionnaire in September 2020, just after the peak of the second COVID‐19 wave in Victoria. Responses captured demographic data, parental status, profession, happiness levels, fear of COVID‐19 and e‐communication efficacy. Results A 57% response rate was achieved. 69% of respondents were female; 40% were aged 45+ and 35% had school‐aged children. Staff aged 45+ showed a significantly greater fear of COVID‐19 than younger staff. 36% of respondents reported feeling nervous or anxious watching news reports about COVID‐19. 92% of staff were happy with their work arrangements; staff with children were happier than staff without children with their shifts. Online chat/channels were reported as the preferred e‐communication method between colleagues. Conclusion Staff provided predominantly positive feedback to the changes made in response to the pandemic, reporting high levels of happiness and willingness to continue with the changes implemented during COVID‐19. The strategies adopted worked well and the overall high levels of staff satisfaction will allow our service to quickly pivot should further surges, or another pandemic, arise.

Background and purpose: Due to global ageing, more people will suffer from hip fracture in the future, and many will be left with permanent physical impairments. The care burden for people post hip fracture is high. The aim of this study is to measure longitudinal changes in physical activity levels and fear of falling in people after hip fracture who return home after inpatient rehabilitation.Methods: Longitudinal observational study. Participants were recruited from three rehabilitation centres in Victoria, Australia. Self‐reported fear of falling (Short Falls Efficacy Scale – International) and physical activity levels (Human Activity Profile – Adjusted Activity Score and Frenchay Activity Index) were assessed at 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months after discharge. Mobility (walking speed) and balance (Timed Up‐and‐Go test and Step Test) were measured at discharge from rehabilitation.Results: Thirty‐four participants (mean age: 82 years [SD 8]; 62% female) with unilateral hip fracture were recruited. Participants had moderately impaired balance and mobility at discharge compared to age‐matched normative data; they were all discharged with a walking aid and were 40% slower in their walking speed. Participants had increased fear of falling and reduced physical activity 2 weeks after discharge, which improved significantly (p < 0.01) over the following 6 months, but scores were still lower than the normative values. At 6 months, participants also had moderate to high levels of fear of falling and were less active than the general population of similar age.Discussion: Although fear of falling and physical activity improved in the 6 months following discharge, both remained negatively affected compared to normative data. Rehabilitation post hip fracture should include routine assessment of fear of falling as a potential barrier for return of physical activities.

Summary: Stereotactic body radiotherapy has emerged as one of the preferred treatments for patients with spine metastases, with the potential for long‐term control from lesion irradiation. Post‐treatment vertebral compression fractures are a known complication of this therapy, contributing to worsening pain and reduced quality of life, sometimes requiring surgical intervention. This review explores the current knowledge of post‐radiotherapy fractures, in terms of the rates and associated predictive factors. A search of databases including Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted using keywords such as ‘vertebral compression fracture’, ‘stereotactic body radiotherapy’ and ‘spine metastases’. The search was limited to published studies up to March 2019, reporting clinical outcomes including both the post‐treatment fracture rate and statistical identification of associated risk factors. Rates of post‐treatment fractures ranged from 4 to 39%. A variety of factors were found to increase the risk, including the appearance of lytic vertebral disease, degree of pre‐existing compression, spinal malalignment, increased dose per fraction and a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score >6. This knowledge can enable clinicians to counsel patients when considering management options for spine metastases, maintaining the balance between local tumour control and the risk of subsequent fracture.

Background/aim: Assessment of cognitive function in people with neurosychiatric disorders can be challenging, due to behavioural and psychiatric symptomatology. The Behavioural Assesment Tool for Cognition and Higher Functioning (BATCH) is a validated observational tool that complements formal cognitive testing in this patient population. This study aimed to determine the capacity of the BATCH as a predictive tool for discharge planning.Method: BATCH scores for 330 consecutive admissions for assessment to a specialist neuropsychiatry unit between 2007 and 2015 were analysed. The variables of interest included discharge destination, diagnosis, length of stay, age at discharge and BATCH scores (both subdomain and total). Significant predictors of discharge destination were identified using logistic regression analysis.Results: After adjusting for age at discharge, three variables were found to be significant predictors of discharge destination – length of stay, diagnosis, and BATCH total score. The odds of being discharged to a destination other than home decreased by 3% for each additional BATCH total score unit. The length of stay remained a significant predictor of discharge destination when adjusting for BATCH total score, age at admission and diagnosis.Conclusion: BATCH total scores, but not subdomain scores, were predictive of discharge destination, along with the patients’ length of stay and diagnosis. Knowledge of this relationship may guide clinical discharge planning, when working with the complex needs of this group of patients. A larger study is indicated to determine the range and cut‐off scores for discharge destinations other than home.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multiple sclerosis monitoring is based on the detection of new lesions on brain MR imaging. Outside of study populations, MS imaging studies are reported by radiologists with varying expertise. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of MS reporting performed by neuroradiologists (someone who had spent at least 1 year in neuroradiology subspecialty training) versus non-neuroradiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with ≥2 MS studies with 3T MR imaging that included a volumetric T2 FLAIR sequence performed between 2009 and 2011 inclusive were recruited into this study. The reports for these studies were analyzed for lesions detected, which were categorized as either progressed or stable. The results from a previous study using a semiautomated assistive software for lesion detection were used as the reference standard. RESULTS: There were 5 neuroradiologists and 5 non-neuroradiologists who reported all studies. In total, 159 comparison pairs (ie, 318 studies) met the selection criteria. Of these, 96 (60.4%) were reported by a neuroradiologist. Neuroradiologists had higher sensitivity (82% versus 42%), higher negative predictive value (89% versus 64%), and lower false-negative rate (18% versus 58%) compared with non-neuroradiologists. Both groups had a 100% positive predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroradiologists detect more new lesions than non-neuroradiologists in reading MR imaging for follow-up of MS. Assistive software that aids in the identification of new lesions has a beneficial effect for both neuroradiologists and non-neuroradiologists, though the effect is more profound in the non-neuroradiologist group.

Purpose: To assess the maximum and end torque of a fourth-generation composite humerus model with no screw inserted or with a screw inserted in the distal (subpectoral) position or proximal (suprapectoral) position. Methods: 24 large-size, fourth-generation composite humeri were randomised to the control (n=8), proximal (n=8), or distal (n=8) group. For the latter 2 groups, an 8-mm-head interference screw (7times25 mm) was inserted at 1 cm proximal and 1 cm distal to the superior aspect of the insertion of the pectoralis major tendon, respectively. The maximum and end torque of each humerus was assessed. Results: Respectively for the control, proximal, and distal groups, the maximum torque was 81.8, 78.7, and 74.3 Nm, and the end torque was 80.7, 78.6, and 71.8 Nm; only the difference between control and distal groups was significant (p=0.005 for maximum torque and p=0.033 for end torque). All fractures in both control and proximal groups involved the distal 1/3 humerus. In the distal group, the fractures involved either the distal 1/3 humerus (n=6) or the screw-hole (n=2); the difference between the 2 types of fracture was not significant in terms of maximum torque (75.7 vs. 70.0, p=0.086) or end torque (75.3 vs. 61.4, p=0.40). Conclusion: Compared with proximal placement of an interference screw, distal placement decreased the maximum torque (though not significantly) and may increase the risk of proximal humeral fracture.