Ruolin Liu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Ruolin Liu has a total of 169 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Viktor A. Adalsteinsson
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, USA
25 shared publications - Atish Dipankar Choudhury
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
15 shared publications - Alan D. D'Andrea
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 1 , Boston, Massachusetts
14 shared publications - Amanda F. Pace
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 1 , Boston, Massachusetts
14 shared publications - Biswajit Das
Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD
14 shared publications - Bose S. Kochupurakkal
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 1 , Boston, Massachusetts
14 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 14 October 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Medicine
- p. 1-12
Personalized neoantigen-targeting cancer vaccines in ovarian cancer: a phase 1 trial
- 14 October 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Medicine
- p. 1-12
Personalized neoantigen-targeting cancer vaccines in ovarian cancer: a phase 1 trial
- Open Access
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 1 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
CONSORT diagram of enrolled, randomized, and treated patients in the study. MD, medical doctor; PD, progressive disease; SOC, standard of care. *Registration number was 78, one patient was registered twice.
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 1 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
CONSORT diagram of enrolled, randomized, and treated patients in the study. MD, medical doctor; PD, progressive disease; SOC, standard of care. *Registration number was 78, one patient was registered twice.
- Open Access
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 2 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Clinical outcomes of berzosertib + carboplatin and docetaxel + carboplatin. A and B, Waterfall plots of (A) maximal PSA decline and (B) decline in measurable lesions by RECIST 1.1 from baseline. One patient in arm B (Y, far right) had an unconfirmed PR at cycle 8, followed by progressive disease. C–E, Kaplan–Meier estimates of (C) rPFS, (D) PFS by PCWG3 criteria (“no longer clinically benefiting,” i.e., radiographic or clinical/symptomatic progression), and (E) OS.
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 2 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Clinical outcomes of berzosertib + carboplatin and docetaxel + carboplatin. A and B, Waterfall plots of (A) maximal PSA decline and (B) decline in measurable lesions by RECIST 1.1 from baseline. One patient in arm B (Y, far right) had an unconfirmed PR at cycle 8, followed by progressive disease. C–E, Kaplan–Meier estimates of (C) rPFS, (D) PFS by PCWG3 criteria (“no longer clinically benefiting,” i.e., radiographic or clinical/symptomatic progression), and (E) OS.
- Open Access
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 3 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
HRD status does not demonstrate a statistically significant correlation with clinical benefit in either arm. Kaplan–Meier plots for PFS per PCWG3 criteria with patients across both arms and stratified by (A) HRD status determined by deleterious DDR gene mutations identified by WES of tumor biopsy, (B) RAD51 foci–based IHC, (C) DirectHRD analysis of WGS of cfDNA using a cutoff of 2.5 in the overall cohort, and (D) DirectHRD analysis of WGS of cfDNA using a cutoff of 2.5 in arm B only. NE, not estimable.
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 3 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
HRD status does not demonstrate a statistically significant correlation with clinical benefit in either arm. Kaplan–Meier plots for PFS per PCWG3 criteria with patients across both arms and stratified by (A) HRD status determined by deleterious DDR gene mutations identified by WES of tumor biopsy, (B) RAD51 foci–based IHC, (C) DirectHRD analysis of WGS of cfDNA using a cutoff of 2.5 in the overall cohort, and (D) DirectHRD analysis of WGS of cfDNA using a cutoff of 2.5 in arm B only. NE, not estimable.
- Open Access
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 4 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A combined ATM-RS biomarker identifies the best responders. A and B, Representative images of ATM (A) and pKAP1 (B) staining by IHC in tumor biopsy samples. The scale bar corresponds to 100 μm. C, Box plot showing pKAP1 levels in samples stratified by ATM status. Horizontal red lines depict the cutoff used to classify samples as ATM-RS–positive or ATM-RS–negative. D and E, Kaplan–Meier plots for PFS in patients across both arms (D) and in Arm B only (E), stratified by the combined ATM-RS classification.
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 4 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A combined ATM-RS biomarker identifies the best responders. A and B, Representative images of ATM (A) and pKAP1 (B) staining by IHC in tumor biopsy samples. The scale bar corresponds to 100 μm. C, Box plot showing pKAP1 levels in samples stratified by ATM status. Horizontal red lines depict the cutoff used to classify samples as ATM-RS–positive or ATM-RS–negative. D and E, Kaplan–Meier plots for PFS in patients across both arms (D) and in Arm B only (E), stratified by the combined ATM-RS classification.
- Open Access
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Co-mut plot depicting variants in commonly altered genes in mCRPC (TP53, AR, PIK3CA, PTEN, RB1) and in HRR genes detected in tumor by whole exome sequencing (center triangles, blue) and in cfDNA by targeted panel sequencing at time point 1 (left triangles, purple) and time point 2 (right triangles, green).
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Co-mut plot depicting variants in commonly altered genes in mCRPC (TP53, AR, PIK3CA, PTEN, RB1) and in HRR genes detected in tumor by whole exome sequencing (center triangles, blue) and in cfDNA by targeted panel sequencing at time point 1 (left triangles, purple) and time point 2 (right triangles, green).
- Open Access
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS with patients stratified by HRD status determined by DirectHRD analysis of WGS data from cfDNA.
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS with patients stratified by HRD status determined by DirectHRD analysis of WGS data from cfDNA.
- Open Access
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S3 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS stratified by ATM status by immunohistochemistry in tumor biopsy specimens, and scatter plot showing the relationship between PFS and % pKAP1 positivity in tumor biopsy specimens
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S3 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS stratified by ATM status by immunohistochemistry in tumor biopsy specimens, and scatter plot showing the relationship between PFS and % pKAP1 positivity in tumor biopsy specimens
- Open Access
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S1 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Representativeness of Study Participants
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S1 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Representativeness of Study Participants
- Open Access
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S2 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
TrAE among 65 patients who received assigned protocol treatment (worst grade by patient and toxicity type)
- 18 September 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S2 from A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
TrAE among 65 patients who received assigned protocol treatment (worst grade by patient and toxicity type)