Francesco Lo Iacono

This study presents the results of an experimental investigation conducted on a 2:3 scale model of a two-story stone masonry building. We tested the model on the UniKORE L.E.D.A. lab shake table, simulating the Mw 6.3 earthquake ground motion that struck L’Aquila, Italy, on 6 April 2009, with progressively increasing peak acceleration levels. We installed a network of accelerometric sensors on the model to capture its structural behaviour under seismic excitation. Medium-to lower-cost MEMS accelerometers (classes A and B) were compared with traditional piezoelectric sensors commonly used in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). The experiment assessed the structural performance and damage progression of masonry buildings subjected to realistic earthquake inputs. Additionally, the collected data provided valuable insights into the effectiveness of different sensor types and configurations in detecting key vibrational and failure patterns. All the sensors were able to accurately measure the dynamic response during seismic excitation. However, not all of them were suitable for Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) in noisy environments, where their self-noise represents a crucial factor. This suggests that the self-noise of MEMS accelerometers must be less than 1 µg/√Hz, or preferably below 0.5 µg/√Hz, to obtain good results from the OMA. Therefore, we recommend ultra-low-noise sensors for detecting differences in the structural behaviour before and after seismic events. Our findings provide valuable insights into the seismic vulnerability of masonry structures and the effectiveness of sensors in detecting damage. The management of buildings in earthquake-prone areas can benefit from these specifications.

This study presents the results of an experimental investigation conducted on a 2:3 scale model of a two-storey stone masonry building. We tested the model on the UniKORE L.E.D.A. lab shake table, simulating the Mw 6.3 earthquake ground motion that struck L’Aquila, Italy, on April 06, 2009, with progressively increasing peak acceleration levels. We installed a network of accelerometric sensors on the model to capture its structural behaviour under seismic excitation. Medium- to lower-cost MEMS accelerometers (Classes A and B) were compared with traditional piezoelectric sensors commonly used in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). The experiment assessed the structural performance and damage progression of masonry buildings subjected to realistic earthquake inputs. Additionally, the collected data provided valuable insights into the effectiveness of different sensor types and configurations in detecting key vibrational and failure patterns. All the sensors were able to accurately measure the dynamic response during seismic excitation. However, not all of them were suitable for Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) in noisy environments, where their self-noise represents a crucial factor. This suggests that the self-noise of the MEMS accelerometers must be less than 1 µg/√Hz, or preferably below 0.5 µg/√Hz, to obtain good results from the OMA analysis. Therefore, we recommend ultra-low-noise sensors for detecting differences in structural behaviour before and after seismic events. Our findings provide valuable insights into the seismic vulnerability of masonry structures and effectiveness of sensors in detecting damage. The management of buildings in earthquake-prone areas can benefit from these specifications.

Health assessment and preventive maintenance of structures are mandatory to predict injuries and to schedule required interventions, especially in seismic areas. Structural health monitoring aims to provide a robust and effective approach to obtaining valuable information on structural conditions of buildings and civil infrastructures, in conjunction with methodologies for the identification and, sometimes, localization of potential risks. In this paper a low-cost solution for structural health monitoring is proposed, exploiting a customized embedded system for the acquisition and storing of measurement signals. Experimental surveys for the assessment of the sensing node have also been performed. The obtained results confirmed the expected performances, especially in terms of resolution in acceleration and tilt measurement, which are 0.55 mg and 0.020°, respectively. Moreover, we used a dedicated algorithm for the classification of recorded signals in the following three classes: noise floor (being mainly related to intrinsic noise of the sensing system), exogenous sources (not correlated to the dynamic behavior of the structure), and structural responses (the response of the structure to external stimuli, such as seismic events, artificially forced and/or environmental solicitations). The latter is of main interest for the investigation of structures’ health, while other signals need to be recognized and filtered out. The algorithm, which has been tested against real data, demonstrates relevant features in performing the above-mentioned classification task.