Borka Pezo-Nikolić

Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have significantly reduced the incidence of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure, particularly those with ischemic heart disease. However, the impact on overall mortality remains controversial, especially in non-ischemic heart failure patients. The Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure (DANISH) trial and subsequent studies have questioned the efficacy of ICDs in this population, particularly among older patients. The present study aimed to evaluate survival outcomes and predictors in a Croatian cohort of patients with an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) device. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 614 patients who received an ICD or CRT-D device at KBC Zagreb between 2009 and 2018. Patient data, including demographic information, device indication, and clinical parameters, were collected at the time of implantation. Follow-up data were systematically recorded to assess device activation and survival outcomes. Statistical analyses included a detailed descriptive analysis, Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, and Cox regression models. Results: The cohort consisted predominantly of males (83.4%), with a mean age of 58.7 years. Most had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (mean 31.4%) and were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III. Over a median follow-up of 48.4 months, 36.6% of patients died. Device activation occurred in 30.3% of patients, with appropriate activation observed in 88.2% of these cases. Cox regression identified age, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), and decompensation history as significant survival predictors. Conclusions: This study confirmed that appropriate device activation improved survival in patients with an ICD/CRT-D. Age, NSVT, and history of decompensation were key predictors of device activation and survival outcomes. These findings underscore the need for individualized patient assessment when considering inserting ICDs, particularly in non-ischemic heart failure patients. Further research is needed to refine clinical guidelines and optimize patient selection for ICD therapy.

Aims: We aimed to assess the acute and midterm efficacy of premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation guided by multielectrode and point-by-point (PbP) mapping. Methods and results: This is a retrospective, international multicentre study of consecutive patients referred for PVC ablation in 10 hospital centres from January 2017 to December 2021. Based on the mapping approach, two cohorts were identified: the ‘Multipolar group’, where a dedicated high-density mapping catheter was employed, and the ‘PbP group’, where mapping was performed with the ablation catheter. Procedural endpoints, safety, and acute (procedural) and midterm efficacies were assessed. Of the 698 patients included in this study, 592 received activation mapping [46% males, median age of 55 (41–65) years]—248 patients in the Multipolar group and 344 patients in the PbP group. A higher number of activation points [432 (217–843) vs. 95 (42–185), P < 0.001], reduced mapping time (40 ± 38 vs. 61 ± 50 min, P < 0.001), and shorter procedure time (124 ± 60 vs. 143 ± 63 min, P < 0.001) were reported in the Multipolar group. Both groups had high acute success rates (84.7% with Multipolar mapping vs. 81.3% with PbP mapping, P = 0.63), as well as midterm efficacy (83.4% vs. 77.4%, P = 0.08), with no significant differences in the risk of adverse events (6.0% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.24). However, for left-sided PVC ablation specifically, there was a higher midterm efficacy in the Multipolar group (80.7% vs. 69.5%, P = 0.04), with multipolar mapping being an independent predictor of success [adjusted OR = 2.231 (95% CI, 1.476–5.108), P = 0.02]. Conclusion: The acute and midterm efficacies of PVC ablation are high with both multipolar and PbP mapping, although the former allows for quicker procedures and may potentially improve the outcomes of left-sided PVC ablation.

Introduction The aim of this study was to report the long-term follow-up results of cryoballoon (CB) ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent second-generation CB ablation from February 2015 to December 2017 were included in our study. In all procedures, we used a 28-mm CB placed via a single transseptal puncture guided by intracardiac ultrasound. A 20-mm octapolar intraluminal circular catheter was used for intracardiac recordings. A single 180-s freeze strategy was employed. Repeated procedures were performed with a 3D mapping system and radiofrequency catheters. Results A total of 126 patients (69.8% male, mean age 57 ± 11 years), of which 77.0% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), were included in the study. After a 5-year period, 52.4% of patients were in sinus rhythm without AF recurrence, off antiarrhythmic drugs. A total of 61.9% of patients were free of AF recurrence when redo PVI procedures were performed. When accounting for redo pulmonary vein isolation and antiarrhythmic drugs, a total of 73.8% of the patients were without AF recurrence in long-term follow-up. The patients who underwent redo pulmonary vein isolation procedures had statistically significant lower rates of AF recurrence (p = 0.006). In patients with PAF, long-term success rates improved from 62.9 to 79.4% for patients who underwent the redo procedure (p = 0.020). In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF), success rates went up from 41.4 to 55.1% for patients with single or repeated PVI procedure (p = 0.071). In the whole cohort, a total of 3 (2.4%) procedure-related major complications occurred which included persistent PNP, arterial pseudoaneurysm, and arteriovenous fistula. Conclusion Our data suggest a favorable long-term safety and efficacy profile of second-generation CB ablation. In the mixed paroxysmal and persistent population, up to 73.8% of patients remained free of AF recurrence in the 5-year follow-up, when accounting for redo procedures and AADs. Only 2.4% of patients experienced major complications of the ablation procedure, none with permanent sequelae. Graphical Abstract Central figure. K-M curves for overall population