Fourat Ridouani

Minimally invasive treatment of thyroid cancer is an emerging treatment option for well-selected patients; this is driven by the rising incidence of low-risk disease and increasing emphasis on reducing treatment-related morbidity. Treatment strategies include primary thyroid cancer with either curative or palliative intent or locoregional control of recurrent disease, most commonly metastatic cervical lymph nodes following thyroidectomy. This article will discuss thyroid cancer subtypes, updated guideline-based recommendations, patient selection and preprocedural evaluation, minimally invasive treatment options with emphasis on radiofrequency ablation, procedural technique, complications, and posttreatment surveillance strategies.

The aim of this study was to examine the value of tumor enhancement parameters on dual-phase cone-beam CT (CBCT) in predicting initial response, local progression-free survival (L-PFS) and overall survival (OS) following hepatic artery embolization (HAE). Between Feb 2016 and Feb 2023, 13 patients with 29 hepatic tumors treated with HAE were analyzed. Pre- and post-embolization, subtracted CBCTs were performed, and tumor enhancement parameters were measured, resulting in three parameters: pre-embolization Adjusted Tumor Enhancement (pre-ATE), post-embolization ATE and the difference between pre- and post-ATE (∆ATE). Treatment response was evaluated using the mRECIST criteria at 1 month. Tumors were grouped into complete response (CR) and non-complete response (non-CR) groups. To account for the effect of multiple lesions per patient, a cluster data analytic method was employed. The Kaplan–Meier method was utilized for survival analysis using the lesion with the lowest ∆ATE value in each patient. Seventeen (59%) tumors showed CR and twelve (41%) showed non-CR. Pre-ATE was 38.5 ± 10.6% in the CR group and 30.4 ± 11.0% in the non-CR group (p = 0.023). ∆ATE in the CR group was 39 ± 12 percentage points following embolization, compared with 29 ± 11 in the non-CR group (p = 0.009). Patients with ∆ATE > 33 had a median L-PFS of 13.1 months compared to 5.7 in patients with ∆ATE ≤ 33 (95% CI = 0.038–0.21) (HR, 95% CI = 0.45, 0.20–0.9, p = 0.04). Patients with ∆ATE ≤ 33 had a median OS of 19.7 months (95% CI = 3.77–19.8), while in the ∆ATE > 33 group, median OS was not reached (95% CI = 20.3-NA) (HR, 95% CI = 0.15, 0.018–1.38, p = 0.04). CBCT-derived ATE parameters can predict treatment response, L-PFS and OS following HAE.

Background: Cancer patients with pelviabdominal masses can suffer from lower extremity symptoms due to venous compression. The effectiveness of venous stenting has been established in extrinsic venous compression in benign conditions like May-Thurner syndrome. In this retrospective study we evaluate the efficacy and safety of caval, iliocaval and iliofemoral venous stenting for cases of extrinsic venous compression caused by malignant masses in cancer patients. Methods: IRB-approved retrospective review of patients who underwent iliofemoral venography with venoplasty and stenting between January 2018 and February 2022 was performed. Patients with extrinsic venous compression caused by malignant masses were included. Data on patient demographics, pre-procedure symptoms, procedural technique, stent characteristics, outcomes and follow-up were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to assess technical success, clinical success, primary stent patency and adverse events of the procedure. Results: Thirty-seven patients (19 males, 18 females) who underwent 45 procedures were included. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was present in 21 (57%) patients. Twenty-nine patients (78%, 95% CI 62–90%) reported clinical improvement of the presenting symptoms. The median overall survival after the procedure was 4.7 months (95% CI 3.58–5.99). Eight (22%) patients were alive at last follow up with median follow up of 10.33 months (Range 2–25 months). Twenty-six patients had patent stents on their last follow up imaging (70%, 95% CI 61%-91%). Two patients had a small access site hematoma which resolved spontaneously. Two patients developed moderate, and 1 patient developed severe adverse events related to post procedure therapeutic anticoagulation. Conclusion: Venous stenting is a safe procedure and should be considered as part of the palliative care for patients with debilitating lower extremity symptoms related to iliocaval and iliofemoral venous compression. Graphical

Purpose: Evaluate safety and feasibility of simultaneous biliary drainage (BD) and portal vein embolization (PVE) prior to hepatectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) patients. Methods: From January 2010 to June 2022, patients with potentially surgically resectable HCCA who underwent preoperative PVE and BD were analyzed. Type of initial BD, time interval between BD and PVE, changes in future liver remnant (FLR), time interval between BD, PVE and resection, and complications were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the BD-PVE interval: Group A: simultaneous BD and PVE or within 7 days (d), n = 6; Group B: d ≥ 7 to ≤ 30, n = 7; Group C: d > 30, n = 14). Primary endpoints were post-PVE complications, FLR change, and resection rate. Secondary endpoints were Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3, Grade B/C Post Hepatectomy Liver Failure (PHLF) and 90 days mortality rate. Results: A total of 27 patients (mean age = 64.4 +/- 11.2 years) underwent both BD and PVE prior to hepatectomy. Mean degree of hypertrophy at 4-6 weeks post-PVE was 10.4 +/- 3.7% with no significant difference between the 3 groups (p > 0.05). Resection was 67% in Group A, and 57% and 36% in groups B and C respectively (p < 0.05). Time to surgery was 38.5 +/- 12 days in Group A, and 60 and 147 days in groups B and C respectively (p = 0.002). No major post PVE SIR complication was reported in group A. Overall rate of Grade III/IV Clavien-Dindo complication was 61.5% with no difference among the three groups (50%, 75%, and 60%; groups A, B and C, respectively). Overall PHLF Grade B/C was reported in 46.2% of patients. No patients in Group A demonstrated Grade B/C PHLF. Conclusion: Simultaneous BD and PVE is safe and reduces the time to surgery, which may help contribute to a higher rate of surgical resection.

Background Cancer patients with pelviabdominal masses can suffer from lower extremity symptoms due to venous compression. The effectiveness of venous stenting has been established in extrinsic venous compression in benign conditions like May-Thurner syndrome. In this retrospective study we evaluate the efficacy and safety of caval, iliocaval and iliofemoral venous stenting for cases of extrinsic venous compression caused by malignant masses in cancer patients. Methods IRB-approved retrospective review of patients who underwent iliofemoral venography with venoplasty and stenting between January 2018 and February 2022 was performed. Patients with extrinsic venous compression caused by malignant masses were included. Data on patient demographics, pre-procedure symptoms, procedural technique, stent characteristics, outcomes and follow-up were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to assess technical success, clinical success, primary stent patency and adverse events of the procedure. Results Thirty-seven patients (19 males, 18 females) who underwent 45 procedures were included. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was present in 21 (57%) patients. Twenty-nine patients (78%, 95% CI 62-90%) reported clinical improvement of the presenting symptoms. The median overall survival after the procedure was 4.7 months (95% CI 3.58-5.99). Eight (22%) patients were alive at last follow up with median follow up of 10.33 months (Range 2-25 months). Twenty-six patients had patent stents on their last follow up imaging (70%, 95% CI 61%-91%). Two patients had a small access site hematoma which resolved spontaneously. Two patients developed moderate, and 1 patient developed severe adverse events related to post procedure therapeutic anticoagulation Conclusion Venous stenting is a safe procedure and should be considered as part of the palliative care for patients with debilitating lower extremity symptoms related to iliocaval and iliofemoral venous compression.

To compare the safety and efficacy of sclerotherapy and lymphatic embolization (LE) in the treatment of symptomatic iatrogenic lymphoceles following the placement of a percutaneous drainage catheter. This is a retrospective study of 46 patients who underwent sclerotherapy (17 patients) or LE (29 patients) for the management of symptomatic iatrogenic lymphoceles following percutaneous drain placement between January 2017 and December 2021. The demographic characteristics, time between surgery and lymphatic intervention, clinical presentation, number of procedures, drain output pre- and post-intervention, time from intervention to drain removal, and adverse events were collected and compared for both groups. The clinical success rate, defined as the successful removal of the drain after one procedure, was calculated. Adverse events were reported according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification. A statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS, and the P value for statistical significance was set at 0.05. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in the scale variables, and Fisher's exact test was used to compare the categorical and ordinal variables between both groups. A total of 46 patients with 49 lymphoceles met the inclusion criteria of the study. Of these patients, 17 patients (19 lymphoceles) underwent sclerotherapy, and 29 patients (30 lymphoceles) underwent LE as their initial procedures. The clinical success after one procedure was significantly higher (83% vs. 47%, P = 0.011), and the median time between the first intervention and drain removal was significantly shorter in the LE group (median duration of 6 vs. 13 days, P = 0.018) compared with the sclerotherapy group. No statistically significant difference in adverse events was noted between both groups (0.26 vs. 0.10, P = 0.11). This study found that LE had a higher clinical success rate after the first procedure and a shorter time to drain removal compared with sclerotherapy. There was no difference in the rate of adverse events between both groups. Although LE is a safe and promising technique, a prospective study is needed to further compare the efficacy of both treatment modalities.

Background and Objectives: To compare ablation zone involution following microwave ablation (MWA) or irreversible electroporation (IRE) of liver tumors. Materials and Methods: MWA or IRE performed for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during January 2011 to December 2015 were analyzed. Patients with a tumoral response on 1-year follow-up computed tomography (CT) were included. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the differences between the two modalities on ablation zone involution observed on CT at 6 (M6) and 12 months (M12), and on laboratory values (total bilirubin, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and platelets count). The likelihood ratio test was used to assess whether the association between ablation modalities and these outcomes differed over time. Results: Seventeen (17/44, 39%) women and 27 (27/44, 61%) men were included, with 25 HCC (25/44, 57%) and 19 CRLM (19/44, 43%) patients. IRE was used in 9 (9/19, 47%) CRLM and 5 (5/25, 20%) HCC patients, respectively. All other patients had MWA. Ablation zone size and involution between IRE and MWA differed significantly over time (interaction p < 0.01), with a mean of 241.04 vs. 771.08 mm² (ratio 0.313; 95% CI, 0.165–0.592; p < 0.01) at M6 and 60.47 vs. 589.43 mm² (ratio 0.103; 95% CI, 0.029–0.365; p < 0.01) at M12. Changes in liver enzymes did not differ significantly between IRE and MWA at both timepoints. Conclusions: Liver tumors treated with IRE underwent faster involution when compared to tumors treated with MWA, but liver enzymes levels were comparable.

Background To compare laser ablation (LA) zone dimensions at two predetermined energy parameters to cover a theoretical 10 mm zone + 2 mm margin in a thyroid swine model. Methods Approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee was obtained. After hydrodissection, an ultrasound-guided LA (Elesta Echolaser X4 with Orblaze technology, 1064 nm) was performed in the periphery of the thyroid in 10 swine. Two cohorts were established to ablate a region of 10mm diameter with 2mm margin based on manufacturer’s ex vivo data (n= 5 at 3W/1400J and n= 5 at 3W/1800J). The ablation zone was measured on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and compared to the pathological specimen. Euthanasia was performed 48 hours following ablation. Results All ablations in the 3W/1800J group achieved a diameter of 12 mm ± 1 mm in three dimensions. In the 3W/1400J group, 1 ablation reached 12 mm ± 1 mm in 2 dimensions and 4 ablations reached this size in one dimension. Maximum diameter was higher in the 3W/1800J compared to the 3W/1400J group, both on histology (1.46 cm ± 0.05 vs. 1.1 cm ± 0.0, p< 0.01) and CT (1.52 cm ± 0.04 vs. 1.18 cm ± 0.04, p< 0.01). Similar results were obtained regarding volumes, both on histology (1.12 mL ± 0.13 vs. 0.57 mL ± 0.06, p< 0.01) and CT (1.24 mL ± 0.13 vs. 0.59 mL ± 0.07, p< 0.01). Histology showed coagulation necrosis and correlated well with CT measurements. Conclusion Optimal parameters to obtain a LA zone of 10 mm with 2 mm margin utilizing a single needle are 3W/1800J.