Deana Pennington
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Deana Pennington has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kate Thompson
Queensland University of Technology
4 shared publications - David C. Gosselin
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
3 shared publications - Shirley Vincent
Vincent Evaluation Consulting LLC
3 shared publications Antje Danielson
Tufts University
1 shared publication- Antje Danielson
Tufts University
1 shared publication Chris Boone
School of Sustainability, Arizona State Universtiy, Tempe, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 9 December 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 16 (23) , 10772
Integrating Scenario Analysis and Participatory Modeling to Generate Plausible Future Narratives for Water Resources: A Case Study in the Middle Rio Grande River Basin
In addressing complex water management issues, participatory modeling (PM) and scenario analysis (SA) have emerged as pivotal tools for fostering stakeholder engagement, social learning, and collaborative decision-making. This study explores the efficacy of integrating PM and SA within a series of online workshops focused on the Middle Rio Grande River Basin. Data were collected using a mixed-methods approach, including surveys, workshop transcripts, and participant outputs from workshop activities. Through these workshops, participants from diverse backgrounds engaged in collaborative scenario-building exercises, interactive discussions, and hands-on simulations using the SWIM 2.0 model, fostering shared learning and deeper insights into regional water challenges. Our findings highlight the importance of group-level activities in enhancing participants’ understanding, engagement, and trust in modeling tools, which can lead to more informed decision-making processes. The workshops demonstrated significant improvements in SA completion and a deeper connection between participants and policy discussions. However, challenges remain in bridging the gap between SA and active decision-making, particularly in contexts where participants do not perceive themselves as decision-makers. This study underscores the potential of participatory approaches to address complex environmental issues, while also identifying areas for further refinement to enhance stakeholder empowerment and tool usability in collaborative settings.
- 9 December 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 16 (23) , 10772
Open AccessIntegrating Scenario Analysis and Participatory Modeling to Generate Plausible Future Narratives for Water Resources: A Case Study in the Middle Rio Grande River Basin
In addressing complex water management issues, participatory modeling (PM) and scenario analysis (SA) have emerged as pivotal tools for fostering stakeholder engagement, social learning, and collaborative decision-making. This study explores the efficacy of integrating PM and SA within a series of online workshops focused on the Middle Rio Grande River Basin. Data were collected using a mixed-methods approach, including surveys, workshop transcripts, and participant outputs from workshop activities. Through these workshops, participants from diverse backgrounds engaged in collaborative scenario-building exercises, interactive discussions, and hands-on simulations using the SWIM 2.0 model, fostering shared learning and deeper insights into regional water challenges. Our findings highlight the importance of group-level activities in enhancing participants’ understanding, engagement, and trust in modeling tools, which can lead to more informed decision-making processes. The workshops demonstrated significant improvements in SA completion and a deeper connection between participants and policy discussions. However, challenges remain in bridging the gap between SA and active decision-making, particularly in contexts where participants do not perceive themselves as decision-makers. This study underscores the potential of participatory approaches to address complex environmental issues, while also identifying areas for further refinement to enhance stakeholder empowerment and tool usability in collaborative settings.
- 24 August 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 137-147
EMBeRS Model for Facilitating Crossdisciplinary Learning and Systems Thinking
- 24 August 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 137-147
EMBeRS Model for Facilitating Crossdisciplinary Learning and Systems Thinking
- 24 August 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 179-193
Evidence-Based Strategies for Improving Project Outcomes
- 24 August 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 179-193
Evidence-Based Strategies for Improving Project Outcomes
- 24 August 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 149-159
Implementing EMBeRS in Graduate Courses
- 25 September 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Sustainability Science
- Vol. 15 (2) , 647-661
Bridging sustainability science, earth science, and data science through interdisciplinary education
- 25 September 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Sustainability Science
- Vol. 15 (2) , 647-661
Bridging sustainability science, earth science, and data science through interdisciplinary education
- 1 February 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
- Vol. 6 (2) , 268-274
Introduction to the special issue: negotiating boundaries: effective leadership of interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability programs
- 1 February 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
- Vol. 6 (2) , 268-274
Introduction to the special issue: negotiating boundaries: effective leadership of interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability programs
- 11 December 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
- Vol. 6 (2) , 300-312
A conceptual model for knowledge integration in interdisciplinary teams: orchestrating individual learning and group processes
- 11 December 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
- Vol. 6 (2) , 300-312
A conceptual model for knowledge integration in interdisciplinary teams: orchestrating individual learning and group processes
- 3 October 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
- Vol. 6 (2) , 278-286
The EMBeRS project: employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis
- 3 October 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
- Vol. 6 (2) , 278-286
The EMBeRS project: employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis
- 14 April 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
- Vol. 20 (3) , 165-196
Bridging the Disciplinary Divide: Co-Creating Research Ideas in eScience Teams
- 14 April 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
- Vol. 20 (3) , 165-196
Bridging the Disciplinary Divide: Co-Creating Research Ideas in eScience Teams