Amelia Li Min Tan

Background: Cancer treatment response is highly variable, even among patients with the same tumor type and treatment. Exceptional responders (ERs), who are individuals who experience unusually favorable outcomes, provide critical insights into the biological factors driving treatment success. While prior studies have highlighted the role of somatic changes, the contribution of germline rare variants remains underexplored. This study aimed to uncover the genetic underpinnings of exceptional responses by identifying rare, non-silent and predicted deleterious germline mutations enriched among ERs compared to typical cancer patients. Methods: The Network of Enigmatic Exceptional Responders (NEER) project collected clinical and germline whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data from 53 ERs. After quality control procedures and ancestry background checks, 51 ERs were left for final analysis. While non-silent mutations were identified based on allele frequencies and mutation types, multiple pathogenicity predictors were applied for predicted deleterious variants. These were compared to a harmonized and comparable subset from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) cohort (n=414) using Fisher’s exact tests. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis applied to evaluate prognostic associations in PCAWG patients. Additionally, Fisher’s exact tests were conducted stratified by cancer type and treatment regimen to identify potential associations between rare germline variants and therapeutic responses. Results: Variants in immune-related genes such as CCL26 and GPRC5D were prevalent, suggesting enhanced immune regulation among ERs. Fourteen genes with non-silent and eight with predicted deleterious mutations showed significantly different frequencies between NEER and PCAWG cohorts (FDR < 0.05). IRX3 emerged as a protective gene enriched in ERs, whereas OR6B2 was associated with poor survival in PCAWG lung cancer patients. Moreover, rare non-silent germline variants in drug target genes were enriched among ERs treated with cisplatin and doxorubicin, implicating altered DNA repair and drug-binding mechanisms in their remarkable outcomes. Conclusions: This study reveals a distinctive germline mutation landscape in exceptional cancer responders, marked by immune-related and drug-target-associated variants that may enhance therapy response and prolong survival. The findings highlight potential novel prognostic biomarkers, such as IRX3 and OR6B2, providing a foundation for developing personalized cancer treatments informed by rare genetic variation.

There is an ongoing need for scalable tools to aid researchers in both retrospective and prospective standardization of discrete entity types—such as disease names, cell types, or chemicals—that are used in metadata associated with biomedical data. When metadata are not well-structured or precise, the associated data are harder to find and are often burdensome to reuse, analyze, or integrate with other datasets due to the upfront curation effort required to make the data usable—typically through retrospective standardization and cleaning of the (meta)data. With the goal of facilitating the task of standardizing metadata—either in bulk or in a one-by-one fashion, e.g. to support autocompletion of biomedical entities in forms—we have developed an open-source tool called text2term that maps free-text descriptions of biomedical entities to controlled terms in ontologies. The tool is highly configurable and can be used in multiple ways that cater to different users and expertise levels—it is available on Python Package Index and can be used programmatically as any Python package; it can also be used via a command-line interface or via our hosted, graphical user interface–based web application or by deploying a local instance of our interactive application using Docker. Database URL: https://pypi.org/project/text2term

Objective: Integrating electronic health record (EHR) data with other resources is essential in rare disease research due to low disease prevalence. Such integration is dependent on the alignment of ontologies used for data annotation. The international classification of diseases (ICD) is used to annotate clinical diagnoses, while the human phenotype ontology (HPO) is used to annotate phenotypes. Although these ontologies overlap in the biomedical entities they describe, the extent to which they are interoperable is unknown. We investigate how well aligned these ontologies are and whether such alignments facilitate EHR data integration. Materials and Methods: We conducted an empirical analysis of the coverage of mappings between ICD and HPO. We interpret this mapping coverage as a proxy for how easily clinical data can be integrated with research ontologies such as HPO. We quantify how exhaustively ICD codes are mapped to HPO by analyzing mappings in the unified medical language system (UMLS) Metathesaurus. We analyze the proportion of ICD codes mapped to HPO within a real-world EHR dataset. Results and Discussion: Our analysis revealed that only 2.2% of ICD codes have direct mappings to HPO in UMLS. Within our EHR dataset, less than 50% of ICD codes have mappings to HPO terms. ICD codes that are used frequently in EHR data tend to have mappings to HPO; ICD codes that represent rarer medical conditions are seldom mapped. Conclusion: We find that interoperability between ICD and HPO via UMLS is limited. While other mapping sources could be incorporated, there are no established conventions for what resources should be used to complement UMLS.

Few studies examining the patient outcomes of concurrent neurological manifestations during acute COVID-19 leveraged multinational cohorts of adults and children or distinguished between central and peripheral nervous system (CNS vs. PNS) involvement. Using a federated multinational network in which local clinicians and informatics experts curated the electronic health records data, we evaluated the risk of prolonged hospitalization and mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients from 21 healthcare systems across 7 countries. For adults, we used a federated learning approach whereby we ran Cox proportional hazard models locally at each healthcare system and performed a meta-analysis on the aggregated results to estimate the overall risk of adverse outcomes across our geographically diverse populations. For children, we reported descriptive statistics separately due to their low frequency of neurological involvement and poor outcomes. Among the 106,229 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (104,031 patients ≥18 years; 2,198 patients <18 years, January 2020-October 2021), 15,101 (14%) had at least one CNS diagnosis, while 2,788 (3%) had at least one PNS diagnosis. After controlling for demographics and pre-existing conditions, adults with CNS involvement had longer hospital stay (11 versus 6 days) and greater risk of (Hazard Ratio = 1.78) and faster time to death (12 versus 24 days) than patients with no neurological condition (NNC) during acute COVID-19 hospitalization. Adults with PNS involvement also had longer hospital stay but lower risk of mortality than the NNC group. Although children had a low frequency of neurological involvement during COVID-19 hospitalization, a substantially higher proportion of children with CNS involvement died compared to those with NNC (6% vs 1%). Overall, patients with concurrent CNS manifestation during acute COVID-19 hospitalization faced greater risks for adverse clinical outcomes than patients without any neurological diagnosis. Our global informatics framework using a federated approach (versus a centralized data collection approach) has utility for clinical discovery beyond COVID-19.

Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) provide patients and clinicians with valuable insights about glycemic control that aid in diabetes management. The advent of large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, has enabled real-time text generation and summarization of medical data. Further, recent advancements have enabled the integration of data analysis features in chatbots, such that raw data can be uploaded and analyzed when prompted. Studying both the accuracy and suitability of LLM-derived data analysis performed on medical time series data, such as CGM data, is an important area of research. The objective of this study was to assess the strengths and limitations of using an LLM to analyze raw CGM data and produce summaries of 14 days of data for patients with type 1 diabetes. This study used simulated CGM data from 10 different cases. We first evaluated the ability of GPT-4 to compute quantitative metrics specific to diabetes found in an Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP). Then, using two independent clinician graders, we evaluated the accuracy, completeness, safety, and suitability of qualitative descriptions produced by GPT-4 across five different CGM analysis tasks. We demonstrated that GPT-4 performs well across measures of accuracy, completeness, and safety when producing summaries of CGM data across all tasks. These results highlight the capabilities of using an LLM to produce accurate and safe narrative summaries of medical time series data. We highlight several limitations of the work, including concerns related to how GPT-4 may misprioritize highlighting instances of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Our work serves as a preliminary study on how generative language models can be integrated into diabetes care through CGM analysis, and more broadly, the potential to leverage LLMs for streamlined medical time series analysis.

Electronic health records (EHRs) contain a wealth of information that can be used to further precision health. One particular data element in EHRs that is not only under-utilized but oftentimes unaccounted for is missing data. However, missingness can provide valuable information about comorbidities and best practices for monitoring patients, which could save lives and reduce burden on the healthcare system. We characterize patterns of missing data in laboratory measurements collected at the University of Pennsylvania Hospital System from long-term COVID-19 patients and focus on the changes in these patterns between 2020 and 2021. We investigate how these patterns are associated with comorbidities such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and 90-day mortality in ARDS patients. This work displays how knowledge and experience can change the way clinicians and hospitals manage a novel disease. It can also provide insight into best practices when it comes to patient monitoring to improve outcomes.

A group of 54 exceptional responders (ERs) to cancer treatment across a variety of cancers and treatments were compared to typical cancer patients using previously defined polygenic risk scores (PRS) for multiple autoimmune-related diseases including type 1 diabetes (T1D), hypothyroidism, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory bowel (IBD) disease. Most of the ERs were not treated with checkpoint inhibitors and included a broad array of tumor types. Significantly elevated PRSs were found between ERs relative to typical cancer patients in T1D, hypothyroidism, and psoriasis. IBD PRS scores were significantly decreased in the ERs.

The risk profiles of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) have not been well characterized in multi-national settings with appropriate controls. We leveraged electronic health record (EHR) data from 277 international hospitals representing 414,602 patients with COVID-19, 2.3 million control patients without COVID-19 in the inpatient and outpatient settings, and over 221 million diagnosis codes to systematically identify new-onset conditions enriched among patients with COVID-19 during the post-acute period. Compared to inpatient controls, inpatient COVID-19 cases were at significant risk for angina pectoris (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09–1.55), heart failure (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10–1.35), cognitive dysfunctions (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07–1.31), and fatigue (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07–1.30). Relative to outpatient controls, outpatient COVID-19 cases were at risk for pulmonary embolism (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.58–2.76), venous embolism (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17–1.54), atrial fibrillation (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13–1.50), type 2 diabetes (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.16–1.36) and vitamin D deficiency (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.30). Outpatient COVID-19 cases were also at risk for loss of smell and taste (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.90–3.06), inflammatory neuropathy (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.21–2.27), and cognitive dysfunction (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04–1.33). The incidence of post-acute cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions decreased across time among inpatient cases while the incidence of cardiovascular, digestive, and metabolic conditions increased among outpatient cases. Our study, based on a federated international network, systematically identified robust conditions associated with PASC compared to control groups, underscoring the multifaceted cardiovascular and neurological phenotype profiles of PASC.

Background In electronic health records, patterns of missing laboratory test results could capture patients’ course of disease as well as reflect clinician’s concerns or worries for possible conditions. These patterns are often understudied and overlooked. This study aims to characterize the patterns of missingness among laboratory data collected across 15 healthcare system sites in three countries for COVID-19 inpatients. Methods We collected and analyzed demographic, diagnosis, and laboratory data for 69,939 patients with positive COVID-19 PCR tests across three countries from 1 January 2020 through 30 September 2021. We analyzed missing laboratory measurements across sites, missingness stratification by demographic variables, temporal trends of missingness, correlations between labs based on missingness indicators over time, and clustering of groups of labs based on their missingness/ordering pattern. Results With these analyses, we identified mapping issues faced in seven out of 15 sites. We also identified nuances in data collection and variable definition for the various sites. Temporal trend analyses may support the use of laboratory test result missingness patterns in identifying severe COVID-19 patients. Lastly, using missingness patterns, we determined relationships between various labs that reflect clinical behaviors. Conclusion This work elucidates how missing data patterns in EHRs can be leveraged to identify quality control issues and relationships between laboratory measurements. Missing data patterns will allow sites to attain better quality data for subsequent analyses and help researchers identify which sites are better poised to study particular questions. Our results could also provide insight into some of the biological relationships between labs in EHR data for COVID-19 patients.