Natasha Alechina

Reward machines have recently been proposed as a means of encoding team tasks in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning. The resulting multi-agent reward machine is then decomposed into individual reward machines, one for each member of the team, allowing agents to learn in a decentralised manner while still achieving the team task. In this paper, we show how multi-agent reward machines for team tasks can be synthesised automatically from an abstraction of the environment in which the agents act and a high-level specification of the desired team behaviour expressed in a fragment of Alternating-time Temporal Logic. We present results from a number of benchmarks which suggest that our automated approach performs as well or better than reward machines in the literature.

The journal track of the 28th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-2025) offered the authors of papers recently accepted for publication by either one of the two leading discipline-wide journals in AI, Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) and the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), the opportunity to present their work at the conference without undergoing an additional round of reviewing. Papers were eligible only if no part had previously been presented at a conference with archival proceedings. Traditionally, the authors of such papers would have missed out on the opportunity to present their work to a broader research audience. This limitation tends to discourage the submission of original work to journals without prior conference publications on the same topic. The intention of the journal track is to encourage a “journal-first” publication strategy–by giving authors the option to present their work at a suitable conference venue such as ECAI. On the following pages, for each paper presented at the journal track, we provide the DOI and the abstract of the original publication.

There has been considerable work on reasoning about the strategic ability of agents under imperfect information. However, existing logics such as Probabilistic Strategy Logic are unable to express properties relating to information transparency. Information transparency concerns the extent to which agents' behaviours and actions are observable by other agents. Reasoning about information transparency is useful in many domains including security, privacy, and decision-making. In this paper, we present a formal framework for reasoning about information transparency properties in stochastic multi-agent systems. We extend Probabilistic Strategy Logic with new observability operators that capture the degree of observability of temporal properties by agents. We show that the model checking problem for the resulting logic is decidable.

Structural equation models (SEM) are a standard approach to representing causal dependencies between variables. In this paper we propose a new interpretation of existing formalisms in the field of Actual Causality in which SEM's are viewed as mechanisms transforming the dynamics of exogenous variables into the dynamics of endogenous variables. This allows us to combine counterfactual causal reasoning with existing temporal logic formalizms, and to introduce a temporal logic, CPLTL, for causal reasoning about such structures. Then, we demonstrate that the standard restriction to so-called recursive models (with no cycles in the dependency graphs) is not necessary in our approach. This fact provides us extra tools for reasoning about mutually dependent processes and feedback loops. Finally, we introduce the notions of model equivalence for temporal causal models and show that CPLTL has an efficient model-checking procedure.

The Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) approach to agent development has formed the basis for much of the research on architectures for autonomous agents. A key advantage of the BDI approach is that agents may pursue multiple intentions in parallel. However, previous approaches to managing possible interactions between concurrently executing intentions are limited to interactions between simple achievement goals (and in some cases maintenance goals). In this paper we present a new approach to intention progression for agents with temporally extended goals which allow mixing reachability and invariant properties, e.g., ``travel to location A while not exceeding a gradient of 5%''. Temporally extended goals may be specified at run-time (top-level goals), and as subgoals in plans. In addition, our approach allows human-authored plans and plans implemented as RL policies to be freely mixed in an agent program, allowing the development of agents with `neuro-symbolic' architectures.

The development of autonomous agents operating in dynamic and stochastic environments requires theories and models of how beliefs and intentions are revised while taking their interplay into account. In this paper, we initiate the study of belief and intention revision in stochastic environments, where an agent's beliefs and intentions are specified in a decidable probabilistic temporal logic. We then provide general Katsuno & Mendelzon-style representation theorems for both belief and intention revision, giving clear semantic characterizations of revision methods.

There have been a number of attempts to develop a formal definition of causality that accords with our intuitions about what constitutes a cause. Perhaps the best known is the “modified” definition of actual causality, HPm, due to Halpern. In this paper, we argue that HPm gives counterintuitive results for some simple causal models. We propose Dynamic Causality (DC), an alternative semantics for causal models that leads to an alternative definition of causes. DC ascribes the same causes as HPm on the examples of causal models widely discussed in the literature and ascribes intuitive causes for the kinds of causal models we consider. Moreover, we show that the complexity of determining a cause under the DC definition is lower than for the HPm definition.

To build a theory of intention revision for agents operating in stochastic environments, we need a logic in which we can explicitly reason about their decision-making policies and those policies' uncertain outcomes. Towards this end, we propose PLBP, a novel probabilistic temporal logic for Markov Decision Processes that allows us to reason about policies of bounded size. The logic is designed so that its expressive power is sufficient for the intended applications, whilst at the same time possessing strong computational properties. We prove that the satisfiability problem for our logic is decidable, and that its model checking problem is PSPACE-complete. This allows us to e.g. algorithmically verify whether an agent's intentions are coherent, or whether a specific policy satisfies safety and/or liveness properties.