Bilikisu Elewonibi
Bilikisu Elewonibi has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Iqbal Shah
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
2 shared publicationsSia Msuya
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, P.O. Box 2240, Moshi, Tanzania
2 shared publicationsCaroline Amour
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, P.O. Box 2240, Moshi, Tanzania
1 shared publication- Chigozie Nkwonta
Smart State Center for Heathcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
1 shared publication David Canning
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
1 shared publication- David Canning
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 February 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Contraception
- Vol. 103 (2) , 127-131
Estimating the lifetime incidence of induced abortion and understanding abortion practices in a Northeastern Tanzania community through a household survey
- 1 February 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Contraception
- Vol. 103 (2) , 127-131
Estimating the lifetime incidence of induced abortion and understanding abortion practices in a Northeastern Tanzania community through a household survey
- Open Access
- 13 February 2020
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Global Health
- Vol. 5 (2) , e002149
The distance-quality trade-off in women’s choice of family planning provider in North Eastern Tanzania
Introduction Studies on the determinants of contraceptive use often consider distance to the nearest health facility offering contraception as a key explanatory variable. Women, however, may not seek contraception from the nearest facility, rather opting for a more distant facility with better quality services or to ensure greater privacy and anonymity. Methods The dataset used include the name of facility where each women obtained contraception, measures of facility quality, and the distance between each woman’s home and 39 potential facilities she might visit. We use a conditional-multinomial logit model to estimate the determinants of her facility choice to visit and how women tradeoff travelling longer distances to use higher quality facilities. Results Only 33% of woman who received contraception from a health facility used their nearest facility. While the nearest facility was 1.2 km away, the average distance to facility used was 2.9 km, indicating women are willing to travel significantly longer distances for higher quality. Women prefer facilities that specialise in providing contraception, provide a large range of methods, do not suffer from stock outs and do not charge fees. Furthermore, on average, women are willing to travel an additional 2 km for a facility that offers more family planning methods, 4.7 km for a facility without one additional health service, 9 km for a facility without fees for contraception and 11 km for a facility not experiencing stock out of an additional contraception. Conclusion Our results suggest that quality of services provided is an important driver of facility choice in addition to distance to facility.
- 13 February 2020
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Global Health
- Vol. 5 (2) , e002149
Open AccessThe distance-quality trade-off in women’s choice of family planning provider in North Eastern Tanzania
Introduction Studies on the determinants of contraceptive use often consider distance to the nearest health facility offering contraception as a key explanatory variable. Women, however, may not seek contraception from the nearest facility, rather opting for a more distant facility with better quality services or to ensure greater privacy and anonymity. Methods The dataset used include the name of facility where each women obtained contraception, measures of facility quality, and the distance between each woman’s home and 39 potential facilities she might visit. We use a conditional-multinomial logit model to estimate the determinants of her facility choice to visit and how women tradeoff travelling longer distances to use higher quality facilities. Results Only 33% of woman who received contraception from a health facility used their nearest facility. While the nearest facility was 1.2 km away, the average distance to facility used was 2.9 km, indicating women are willing to travel significantly longer distances for higher quality. Women prefer facilities that specialise in providing contraception, provide a large range of methods, do not suffer from stock outs and do not charge fees. Furthermore, on average, women are willing to travel an additional 2 km for a facility that offers more family planning methods, 4.7 km for a facility without one additional health service, 9 km for a facility without fees for contraception and 11 km for a facility not experiencing stock out of an additional contraception. Conclusion Our results suggest that quality of services provided is an important driver of facility choice in addition to distance to facility.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2020
- Published by SAGE Publications in Women's Health
- Vol. 16
The association of chronic diseases and mammography among Medicare beneficiaries living in Appalachia
Objective: This study assessed the relationship between presence and number of chronic disease and reception of mammogram in women 65 years and older, and how this relationship is influenced by primary care provider visits. Methods: A total of 3306 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2008 from cancer registries in four Appalachian states were analyzed. Results: Having a mammogram within the past 2 years was associated with having at least one chronic disease. The presence of a chronic disease was associated with an increased likelihood of breast cancer screening adherence but was not a strong predictor when demographic variables were added. Conclusion: This study supports the findings that women with more primary care provider visits were more likely to adhere to breast cancer screening guidelines but having several chronic diseases presents a barrier to achieving guideline-concordant mammography screening, highlighting the importance of preventive screening for patients managing chronic diseases.
- 1 January 2020
- Published by SAGE Publications in Women's Health
- Vol. 16
Open AccessThe association of chronic diseases and mammography among Medicare beneficiaries living in Appalachia
Objective: This study assessed the relationship between presence and number of chronic disease and reception of mammogram in women 65 years and older, and how this relationship is influenced by primary care provider visits. Methods: A total of 3306 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2008 from cancer registries in four Appalachian states were analyzed. Results: Having a mammogram within the past 2 years was associated with having at least one chronic disease. The presence of a chronic disease was associated with an increased likelihood of breast cancer screening adherence but was not a strong predictor when demographic variables were added. Conclusion: This study supports the findings that women with more primary care provider visits were more likely to adhere to breast cancer screening guidelines but having several chronic diseases presents a barrier to achieving guideline-concordant mammography screening, highlighting the importance of preventive screening for patients managing chronic diseases.