Marejka H. Shaevitz
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Marejka H. Shaevitz has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Deborah Wagner Knapp
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
20 shared publications - Deepika Dhawan
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
20 shared publications - Fanfei Meng
Department of Biomedical and Nutritional Sciences College of Health Sciences University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell MA USA
20 shared publications - Jiaqi Zhao
Purdue University 1 Department of Industrial and Molecular Pharmaceutics West Lafayette, Indiana
20 shared publications - Jung Suk Kim
Purdue University 1 Department of Industrial and Molecular Pharmaceutics West Lafayette, Indiana
20 shared publications - Lindsey M. Fourez
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
20 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table 1 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
IMAX regimen for laboratory safety study in beagle dogs.
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable 1 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
IMAX regimen for laboratory safety study in beagle dogs.
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table 1 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Antibodies used in IHC of canine tissues
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table 1 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Antibodies used in IHC of canine tissues
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 2 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Locally injected IMAX does not alter systemic cytokine profiles reflecting minimal systemic absorption. Plasma levels of IFN-α, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10, CCL2, CCL5, CXCL1, and CXCL10 at 1 hour after subcutaneous or intratumoral injection of IMAX (containing 1 mg 2E′) in healthy and CT26 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice (7–8 weeks). n = 4 mice per group. Data are the mean ± SD. P value was calculated by Sidak multiple comparisons test, following two-way ANOVA.
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 2 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Locally injected IMAX does not alter systemic cytokine profiles reflecting minimal systemic absorption. Plasma levels of IFN-α, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10, CCL2, CCL5, CXCL1, and CXCL10 at 1 hour after subcutaneous or intratumoral injection of IMAX (containing 1 mg 2E′) in healthy and CT26 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice (7–8 weeks). n = 4 mice per group. Data are the mean ± SD. P value was calculated by Sidak multiple comparisons test, following two-way ANOVA.
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 1 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Locally injected IMAX is retained at the injection site with minimal systemic absorption
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 1 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Locally injected IMAX is retained at the injection site with minimal systemic absorption
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 7 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Histology of companion dog tumors before and after IMAX treatment. A, Histology of dog RV soft tissue sarcoma. Left, perivascular lymphocytic infiltration (▲). Middle, lack of identifiable tumor cells and marked leukocytic (primarily neutrophils) infiltration with mitotically active giant cells (→). Right, perivascular lymphocytic infiltration (▲) and blue extracellular and intracellular granular materials (inset) located mainly at the tumor periphery. B, Histology of dog SP soft tissue sarcoma. Right, marked intratumoral lymphocytic infiltration (▲). C, Histology of dog CL mammary carcinomas. Ca, caudal mammary gland; Cr, cranial mammary gland. D, Histology of dog BM mammary carcinoma. Right, some areas of the tumor 3 weeks after the second treatment include both malignant epithelial (*) component and malignant mesenchymal component with osteoid (▲), characteristic of carcinosarcoma. Scale bars, 100 μm.
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 7 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Histology of companion dog tumors before and after IMAX treatment. A, Histology of dog RV soft tissue sarcoma. Left, perivascular lymphocytic infiltration (▲). Middle, lack of identifiable tumor cells and marked leukocytic (primarily neutrophils) infiltration with mitotically active giant cells (→). Right, perivascular lymphocytic infiltration (▲) and blue extracellular and intracellular granular materials (inset) located mainly at the tumor periphery. B, Histology of dog SP soft tissue sarcoma. Right, marked intratumoral lymphocytic infiltration (▲). C, Histology of dog CL mammary carcinomas. Ca, caudal mammary gland; Cr, cranial mammary gland. D, Histology of dog BM mammary carcinoma. Right, some areas of the tumor 3 weeks after the second treatment include both malignant epithelial (*) component and malignant mesenchymal component with osteoid (▲), characteristic of carcinosarcoma. Scale bars, 100 μm.
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 5 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of RV soft tissue sarcoma 2 days post IMAX treatment
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 5 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of RV soft tissue sarcoma 2 days post IMAX treatment
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table 4 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Biopsy diagnoses for companion dogs.
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable 4 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Biopsy diagnoses for companion dogs.
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 6 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Tumor response to locally injected IMAX in companion dogs. A,Dog RV soft tissue sarcoma. B,Dog SP soft tissue sarcoma. C,Dog CL mammary tumors. D,Dog BM mammary tumors. Larger symbols indicate the times at which IMAX was administered.
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 6 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Tumor response to locally injected IMAX in companion dogs. A,Dog RV soft tissue sarcoma. B,Dog SP soft tissue sarcoma. C,Dog CL mammary tumors. D,Dog BM mammary tumors. Larger symbols indicate the times at which IMAX was administered.
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 2 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Skin histology of healthy or tumor-bearing mice pre- and post-IMAX treatment (low mag)
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 2 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
Skin histology of healthy or tumor-bearing mice pre- and post-IMAX treatment (low mag)
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 5 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
IMAX achieves complete tumor regression at a reduced dose (0.004 mg/mm3) in BALB/c mice with CT26 tumor. A, CT26 tumors at 30 to 50 mm3 were treated with IMAX at concentrations of 1, 0.5, 0.2, 0.05, or 0.005 mg 2E′ equivalent or PBS (control) via intratumoral injection (n = 5 per dose). B, Average tumor growth curves (mean with SD) and (C) survival curves of all groups after treatment. P values (numbers in parentheses) were calculated by log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test.
- 22 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 5 from Nanoparticulate Immunoactive Complex for Local Chemoimmunotherapy: From Murine Models to Pilot Canine Study
IMAX achieves complete tumor regression at a reduced dose (0.004 mg/mm3) in BALB/c mice with CT26 tumor. A, CT26 tumors at 30 to 50 mm3 were treated with IMAX at concentrations of 1, 0.5, 0.2, 0.05, or 0.005 mg 2E′ equivalent or PBS (control) via intratumoral injection (n = 5 per dose). B, Average tumor growth curves (mean with SD) and (C) survival curves of all groups after treatment. P values (numbers in parentheses) were calculated by log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test.