Chia-Chun Lu

This study aimed to compare different types of right breast cancer radiotherapy planning techniques and to estimate the whole-body effective doses and the critical organ absorbed doses. The three planning techniques are intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; two methods) and hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT (three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy/intensity-modulated radiotherapy). The VMAT technique includes two methods to deliver a dose: non-continuous partial arc and continuous partial arc. A thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) is placed in the RANDO phantom to estimate the organ absorbed dose. Each planning technique applies 50.4 Gy prescription dose and treats critical organs, including the lung and heart. Dose-volume histogram was used to show the planning target volume (V95%), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and other optimized indices. The estimation of whole-body effective dose was based on the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) Publication 60 and 103. The results were as follows: Continuous partial arc and non-continuous partial arc showed the best CI and HI. The heart absorbed doses in the continuous partial arc and hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT were 0.07 ± 0.01% and 0% (V5% and V10%, respectively). The mean dose of the heart was lowest in hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT (1.47 Gy ± 0.02). The dose in the left contralateral lung (V5%) was lowest in continuous partial arc (0%). The right ipsilateral lung average dose and V20% are lowest in continuous partial arc. Hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT has the lowest mean dose to contralateral breast (organs at risk). The whole-body effective doses for ICRP-60 and ICRP-103 were highest in continuous partial arc (2.01 Sv ± 0.23 and 2.89 Sv ± 0.15, respectively). In conclusion, the use of VMAT with continuous arc has a lower risk of radiation pneumonia, while hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT attain lower secondary malignancy risk and cardiovascular complications.

Retrospective dosimetry is one of the most important tools of accident dosimetry for environmental dose estimation when large-scale radiological incidents and nuclear mass-casualty events occur. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry is a physical method for the retrospective assessment of absorbed dose based on the measurement of stable radiation-induced radicals in materials. Different from the fast disappearance of radials in aqueous systems, the radials can persist indefinitely in some organized matrices. Therefore, environmental materials contained in creatures from sea or land can be potentially used as environmental dosimeters for a retrospective dose analysis. This study aims to assess the EPR signals of free radicals from environmental biological samples, potentially for the retrospective dose estimation. The evaluated samples involve ox bone, cyclina shell, clam shell, chitin from squid, and human tissue (enamel and fingernail). First, we dehydrate and grind these materials to the powder with different sizes. Subsequently, all materials were irradiated with different doses ranging from 5 Gy to 50 Gy using 6 MV linear accelerator, and EPR spectra of these materials were obtained from the calculation of peak-to-peak amplitudes. The dose-response curve of EPR signals versus irradiated dose for the six materials shows good linearity (R²~0.99). For the grain-size experiment, the ox bone and tooth with 0.5 mm, the chitin with 0.1 mm, and the others with 1 mm have the strongest signal. For the storage temperature experiment, the optimal temperature of storage is at −20 °C for tooth, fingernail, ox bone, and chitin, at 45 °C for clam shell and cyclina shell where the signal fading is minimal. In conclusion, the developed dose-response curves of the six materials may potentially help a fast, rough retrospective dose reconstruction under the environment when radiation accidents occur.