Pamela Docherty
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Pamela Docherty has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- George Kinnear
School of Mathematics and Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
1 shared publication - Jill Rowan Deans MacKay
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh
1 shared publication Ross Anderson
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
1 shared publicationRoss Galloway
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
1 shared publicationSteph Smith
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
1 shared publicationSusan Rhind
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 January 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal for STEM Education Research
- Vol. 4 (2) , 194-216
Developing the FILL+ Tool to Reliably Classify Classroom Practices Using Lecture Recordings
Lectures are a commonly used teaching method in higher education, but there is significant debate about the relative merits of different classroom practices. Various classroom observation tools have been developed to try to give insight into these practices, beyond the simple dichotomy of “traditional lecturing versus active learning”. Here we review of a selection of classroom observation protocols from an ethological perspective and describe how this informed the development of a new protocol, FILL+. We demonstrate that FILL+ can be applied reliably by undergraduate students after minimal training. We analysed a sample of 208 lecture recordings from Mathematics, Physics, and Veterinary Medicine and found a wide variety of classroom practices, e.g. on average lecturers spent 2.1% (± 2.6%) of the time asking questions, and 79.3% (± 19%) of the lecture talking, but individuals varied considerably. The FILL+ protocol has the potential to be widely used, both in research on effective teaching practices, and in informing discussion of pedagogical approaches within institutions and disciplines.
- 4 January 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal for STEM Education Research
- Vol. 4 (2) , 194-216
Open AccessDeveloping the FILL+ Tool to Reliably Classify Classroom Practices Using Lecture Recordings
Lectures are a commonly used teaching method in higher education, but there is significant debate about the relative merits of different classroom practices. Various classroom observation tools have been developed to try to give insight into these practices, beyond the simple dichotomy of “traditional lecturing versus active learning”. Here we review of a selection of classroom observation protocols from an ethological perspective and describe how this informed the development of a new protocol, FILL+. We demonstrate that FILL+ can be applied reliably by undergraduate students after minimal training. We analysed a sample of 208 lecture recordings from Mathematics, Physics, and Veterinary Medicine and found a wide variety of classroom practices, e.g. on average lecturers spent 2.1% (± 2.6%) of the time asking questions, and 79.3% (± 19%) of the lecture talking, but individuals varied considerably. The FILL+ protocol has the potential to be widely used, both in research on effective teaching practices, and in informing discussion of pedagogical approaches within institutions and disciplines.