Ann Mitsis
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Ann Mitsis has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
David Pearson
2 shared publications- Gamithri Gayana Karunasena
End Food Waste Cooperative Research Centre, Adelaide, 5064, Australia; School of Business and Law, CQ University, Sydney, 2000, Australia
2 shared publications - Jayanath Ananda
School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Melbourne, Australia
2 shared publications - Monika Kansal
Central Queensland University
2 shared publications - Civilai Leckie
Department of Management and Marketing, Swinburne University of Technology
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 27 January 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 391
Quantifying the effects of food management routines on household food waste
- 27 January 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 391
Open AccessQuantifying the effects of food management routines on household food waste
- 1 July 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 306
Analysing behavioural and socio-demographic factors and practices influencing Australian household food waste
- 1 July 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 306
Analysing behavioural and socio-demographic factors and practices influencing Australian household food waste
- 14 March 2016
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Service Theory and Practice
- Vol. 26 (2) , 203-221
Validating and extending the sport brand personality scale
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to validate Tsiotsou’s (2012) sport team brand personality scale in a new country (Australia) and segment (Generation Y) and extend its use from sport teams to individual athletes. This paper also explores the scale’s predictive power in an athlete’s role model influence. Design/methodology/approach: – An online panel survey with 560 responses from Australian Generation Y consumers was obtained. Structural equation modelling was used to test and validate the scale. Findings: – This paper confirmed the sport team brand personality scale can be applied to an individual athlete. Three dimensions of the scale, namely, competitiveness, morality and authenticity, were found to have predictive power in an athlete’s role model influence. Authenticity was the strongest predictor, followed by morality and competitiveness. Practical implications: – Individual athlete brand personality is powerful in influencing how Australian Generation Y consumers identify with their favourite athlete as a role model. These insights assist brand and marketing managers to use athletes as part of their communication strategies regarding brand and product endorsements. Originality/value: – This research addresses Tsiotsou’s (2012) call to test the robustness and external validity of the sport team brand personality scale and to empirically test how the scale can predict outcomes. The authors succeeded in validating and extending the sport brand personality scale to an individual athlete level in a new country and consumer segment. The scale was found to have predictive power in an athlete’s role model influence.
- 14 March 2016
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Service Theory and Practice
- Vol. 26 (2) , 203-221
Validating and extending the sport brand personality scale
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to validate Tsiotsou’s (2012) sport team brand personality scale in a new country (Australia) and segment (Generation Y) and extend its use from sport teams to individual athletes. This paper also explores the scale’s predictive power in an athlete’s role model influence. Design/methodology/approach: – An online panel survey with 560 responses from Australian Generation Y consumers was obtained. Structural equation modelling was used to test and validate the scale. Findings: – This paper confirmed the sport team brand personality scale can be applied to an individual athlete. Three dimensions of the scale, namely, competitiveness, morality and authenticity, were found to have predictive power in an athlete’s role model influence. Authenticity was the strongest predictor, followed by morality and competitiveness. Practical implications: – Individual athlete brand personality is powerful in influencing how Australian Generation Y consumers identify with their favourite athlete as a role model. These insights assist brand and marketing managers to use athletes as part of their communication strategies regarding brand and product endorsements. Originality/value: – This research addresses Tsiotsou’s (2012) call to test the robustness and external validity of the sport team brand personality scale and to empirically test how the scale can predict outcomes. The authors succeeded in validating and extending the sport brand personality scale to an individual athlete level in a new country and consumer segment. The scale was found to have predictive power in an athlete’s role model influence.