Kaili Zhang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Kaili Zhang has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Fengyan Wang
Institute of Moral Education, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
3 shared publications - Juan Shi
School of Education Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao, PR China
3 shared publications - Michel Ferrari
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto
2 shared publications - Zhen-Dong Wang
School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 21 March 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Psychology
- Vol. 42 (35) , 31664
Correction to: Wisdom: Meaning, structure, types, arguments, and future concerns
- 21 March 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Psychology
- Vol. 42 (35) , 31664
Correction to: Wisdom: Meaning, structure, types, arguments, and future concerns
- Top Cited Papers
- 5 February 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Psychology
- Vol. 42 (18) , 15030-15051
Wisdom: Meaning, structure, types, arguments, and future concerns
Narrowing the debate about the meaning of wisdom requires two different understandings of wisdom. (a) As action or behaviour, wisdom refers to well-motivated actors achieving an altruistic outcome by creatively and successfully solving problems. (b) As a psychological trait, wisdom refers to a global psychological quality that engages intellectual ability, prior knowledge and experience in a way that integrates virtue and wit, and is acquired through life experience and continued practice. Thus, we propose a two-dimensional theory of wisdom that integrates virtue and wit. Wisdom can be further divided into “humane wisdom” and “natural wisdom” according to the types of capability required. At the same time, we propose that wisdom classification should integrate the views of Sternberg and Wang and be divided into three types: domain-specific wisdom, domain-general wisdom, and omniscient/ overall wisdom. We then discuss three pressing questions about wisdom, and consider five issues important to the future of wisdom research in psychology.
- 5 February 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Psychology
- Vol. 42 (18) , 15030-15051
Top Cited PapersWisdom: Meaning, structure, types, arguments, and future concerns
Narrowing the debate about the meaning of wisdom requires two different understandings of wisdom. (a) As action or behaviour, wisdom refers to well-motivated actors achieving an altruistic outcome by creatively and successfully solving problems. (b) As a psychological trait, wisdom refers to a global psychological quality that engages intellectual ability, prior knowledge and experience in a way that integrates virtue and wit, and is acquired through life experience and continued practice. Thus, we propose a two-dimensional theory of wisdom that integrates virtue and wit. Wisdom can be further divided into “humane wisdom” and “natural wisdom” according to the types of capability required. At the same time, we propose that wisdom classification should integrate the views of Sternberg and Wang and be divided into three types: domain-specific wisdom, domain-general wisdom, and omniscient/ overall wisdom. We then discuss three pressing questions about wisdom, and consider five issues important to the future of wisdom research in psychology.
- 6 May 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Psychology
- Vol. 42 (6) , 4586-4600
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the filial maturity measure (C-FMM)
- 6 May 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Psychology
- Vol. 42 (6) , 4586-4600
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the filial maturity measure (C-FMM)