Zhijian Li

This study investigates cloud cavitation suppression around a model-scale NACA66 hydrofoil using active water injection and explores the effect of multiple injection parameters. Numerical simulations and a mixed-level orthogonal test method are employed to systematically analyze the impact of jet angle α_jet, jet location L_jet, and jet velocity U_jet on cavitation suppression efficiency and hydrofoil energy performance. The study reveals that jet location has the greatest influence on cavitation suppression, while jet angle has the greatest influence on hydrofoil energy performance. The optimal parameter combination (L_jet = 0.30C, α_jet = +60 degrees, U_jet = 3.25 m/s) effectively balances energy performance and cavitation suppression, reducing cavitation volume by 49.34% and improving lift–drag ratio by 8.55%. The study found that the jet’s introduction not only enhances vapor condensation and reduces the intensity of the vapor–liquid exchange process but also disrupts the internal structure of cavitation clouds and elevates pressure on the hydrofoil suction surface, thereby effectively suppressing cavitation. Further analysis shows that positive-going horizontal jet components enhance the lift–drag ratio, while negative-going components have a detrimental effect. Jet arrangements near the trailing edge negatively impact both cavitation suppression and energy performance. These findings provide a valuable reference for selecting optimal injection parameters to achieve a balance between cavitation suppression and energy performance in hydrodynamic systems.

This study investigates cloud cavitation suppression around a model scale NACA66 hydrofoil using active water injection and explores the effect of multiple injection parameters. Numerical simulations and a mixed-level orthogonal test method are employed to systematically analyze the impact of jet angle αjet, jet location Ljet, and jet velocity Ujet on cavitation suppression efficiency and hydrofoil energy performance. The study reveals that jet location has the greatest influence on cavitation suppression, while jet angle has the greatest influence on hydrofoil energy performance. The optimal parameter combination (Ljet = 0.30C, αjet = +60 degrees, Ujet = 3.25 m/s) effectively balances energy performance and cavitation suppression, reducing cavitation volume by 49.34% and improving lift-drag ratio by 8.55%. The study found that the jet's introduction not only enhances vapor condensation and reduces the intensity of the vapor-liquid exchange process but also disrupts the internal structure of cavitation clouds and elevates pressure on the hydrofoil suction surface, thereby effectively suppressing cavitation. Further analysis shows that positive-going horizontal jet components enhance the lift-drag ratio, while negative-going components have a detrimental effect. Jet arrangements near the trailing edge negatively impact both cavitation suppression and energy performance. These findings provide valuable reference for selecting optimal injection parameters to achieve a balance between cavitation suppression and energy performance in hydrodynamic systems.

This paper proposes an unbalanced duty cycle mod-ulation (UDCM) strategy to optimize conduction loss and improve the overall efficiency for dual-bridge resonant converter (DBRC). Steady-state analysis is performed using fundamental harmonics approximation (FHA), and the ZVS conditions are given. Further, the minimum current trajectory (MCT) is presented, which makes the converter operates with minimum resonant current. Moreover, the ZVS range is extended and the circulating current is well suppressed. The theoretical analysis and calculation are validated through simulation and experimental test.

A passive cavitation suppression structure with flow barriers on its surface was proposed for a typical hydrofoil (NACA66 MOD). Based on the homogeneous equilibrium model and the Zwart-Gerber-Belamri cavitation model, the cavitation characteristics around the hydrofoil before and after flow barriers on hydrofoil surface at a typical operating condition are simulation investigated. Results show that the flow barriers provide on hydrofoil surface are capable of regulating and controlling the cavitation flow field, suppressing 47.1 percent of cavitation flow. By coupling the distribution of cavitation shape, re-entrant jet and pressure field of the hydrofoil with fluid flowing around, and analysing the periodic change of flow field, it is found that to a certain extent, the flow barrier provided on hydrofoil suction surface inhibited the development and shedding of cavitation.

Re-entrant jet causes cloud cavitation shedding, and cavitating vortical flow results in flow field instability. In the present work, a method of water injection is proposed to hinder re-entrant jet and suppress vortex in cloud cavitating flow of a NACA66 (MOD) hydrofoil (Re = 5.1 × 10⁵, σ = 0.83). A combination of filter-based density corrected turbulence model (FBDCM) with the Zwart–Gerber–Belamri cavitation model (ZGB) is adopted to obtain the transient flow characteristics while vortex structures are identified by Q criterion & λ₂ criterion. Results demonstrate that the injected water flow reduces the range of the low-pressure zone below 1940 Pa on the suction surface by 54.76%. Vortex structures are observed both inside the attached and shedding cavitation, and the water injection shrinks the vortex region. The water injection successfully blocks the re-entrant jet by generating a favorable pressure gradient (FPG) and effectively weakens the re-entrant jet intensity by 46.98%. The water injection shrinks the vortex distribution area near the hydrofoil suction surface, which makes the flow in the boundary layer more stable. From an energy transfer perspective, the water injection supplies energy to the near-wall flow, and hence keeps the steadiness of the flow field.