Yun Wang
Research Subjects
Yun Wang has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Wei Wang
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2 shared publications - Xiang Ji
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2 shared publications - Xiaofang Wang
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2 shared publications - Zhijian Li
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2 shared publications - Jun Tan
School of Mechanical Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
1 shared publication - Shiping He
School of Mechanical Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 15 (17) , 9301
Numerical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Formation of Thermal Stratification in Water Bodies
Controlled thermal stratification in water is crucial for applications such as testing the thermal stealth of underwater vehicles and studying aquatic ecosystems. However, existing laboratory methods for generating such stratified environments often lack stability and uniformity. This study systematically investigates the influence of various hot water injection methods on the stability of thermal stratification. A computational fluid dynamics model, incorporating the overlapping dynamic mesh technique and the Volume of Fluid free-surface capturing method, was used to compare four generation strategies: single-side fixed discharge, towed horizontal discharge, towed vertical upward discharge, and multi-nozzle towed vertical upward discharge. The results indicate that towed discharge methods produce more stable and uniform thermal stratification compared to the fixed discharge method, achieving a 10.1% increase in the water body’s vertical stability coefficient and a 4.5% increase in the Richardson number, while the maximum surface temperature difference was significantly reduced from 0.98 K to 0.37 K. Among the towed methods, vertical upward discharge demonstrated superior stability over horizontal discharge, as it directly transports the high-temperature plume to the upper layer, minimizing thermal exchange with the lower layer, with its vertical stability coefficient and Richardson number being 17.9% and 23% higher, respectively. While maintaining a constant heat input per unit volume, the multi-nozzle configuration yielded and Ri values comparable to the single-nozzle version, while further improving the temperature uniformity at the free surface. Consequently, the towed vertical upward discharge emerges as a highly efficient method for establishing stable and uniform thermal stratification, with the multi-nozzle configuration showing significant promise for large-scale applications. This study provides a valuable reference for creating stratified fluid environments and for related engineering fields.- 24 August 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 15 (17) , 9301
Open AccessNumerical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Formation of Thermal Stratification in Water Bodies
Controlled thermal stratification in water is crucial for applications such as testing the thermal stealth of underwater vehicles and studying aquatic ecosystems. However, existing laboratory methods for generating such stratified environments often lack stability and uniformity. This study systematically investigates the influence of various hot water injection methods on the stability of thermal stratification. A computational fluid dynamics model, incorporating the overlapping dynamic mesh technique and the Volume of Fluid free-surface capturing method, was used to compare four generation strategies: single-side fixed discharge, towed horizontal discharge, towed vertical upward discharge, and multi-nozzle towed vertical upward discharge. The results indicate that towed discharge methods produce more stable and uniform thermal stratification compared to the fixed discharge method, achieving a 10.1% increase in the water body’s vertical stability coefficient and a 4.5% increase in the Richardson number, while the maximum surface temperature difference was significantly reduced from 0.98 K to 0.37 K. Among the towed methods, vertical upward discharge demonstrated superior stability over horizontal discharge, as it directly transports the high-temperature plume to the upper layer, minimizing thermal exchange with the lower layer, with its vertical stability coefficient and Richardson number being 17.9% and 23% higher, respectively. While maintaining a constant heat input per unit volume, the multi-nozzle configuration yielded and Ri values comparable to the single-nozzle version, while further improving the temperature uniformity at the free surface. Consequently, the towed vertical upward discharge emerges as a highly efficient method for establishing stable and uniform thermal stratification, with the multi-nozzle configuration showing significant promise for large-scale applications. This study provides a valuable reference for creating stratified fluid environments and for related engineering fields. - Open Access
- 29 July 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Vol. 12 (8) , 1277
Water Injection for Cloud Cavitation Suppression: Analysis of the Effects of Injection Parameters
This study investigates cloud cavitation suppression around a model-scale NACA66 hydrofoil using active water injection and explores the effect of multiple injection parameters. Numerical simulations and a mixed-level orthogonal test method are employed to systematically analyze the impact of jet angle αjet, jet location Ljet, and jet velocity Ujet on cavitation suppression efficiency and hydrofoil energy performance. The study reveals that jet location has the greatest influence on cavitation suppression, while jet angle has the greatest influence on hydrofoil energy performance. The optimal parameter combination (Ljet = 0.30C, αjet = +60 degrees, Ujet = 3.25 m/s) effectively balances energy performance and cavitation suppression, reducing cavitation volume by 49.34% and improving lift–drag ratio by 8.55%. The study found that the jet’s introduction not only enhances vapor condensation and reduces the intensity of the vapor–liquid exchange process but also disrupts the internal structure of cavitation clouds and elevates pressure on the hydrofoil suction surface, thereby effectively suppressing cavitation. Further analysis shows that positive-going horizontal jet components enhance the lift–drag ratio, while negative-going components have a detrimental effect. Jet arrangements near the trailing edge negatively impact both cavitation suppression and energy performance. These findings provide a valuable reference for selecting optimal injection parameters to achieve a balance between cavitation suppression and energy performance in hydrodynamic systems.
- 29 July 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Vol. 12 (8) , 1277
Open AccessWater Injection for Cloud Cavitation Suppression: Analysis of the Effects of Injection Parameters
This study investigates cloud cavitation suppression around a model-scale NACA66 hydrofoil using active water injection and explores the effect of multiple injection parameters. Numerical simulations and a mixed-level orthogonal test method are employed to systematically analyze the impact of jet angle αjet, jet location Ljet, and jet velocity Ujet on cavitation suppression efficiency and hydrofoil energy performance. The study reveals that jet location has the greatest influence on cavitation suppression, while jet angle has the greatest influence on hydrofoil energy performance. The optimal parameter combination (Ljet = 0.30C, αjet = +60 degrees, Ujet = 3.25 m/s) effectively balances energy performance and cavitation suppression, reducing cavitation volume by 49.34% and improving lift–drag ratio by 8.55%. The study found that the jet’s introduction not only enhances vapor condensation and reduces the intensity of the vapor–liquid exchange process but also disrupts the internal structure of cavitation clouds and elevates pressure on the hydrofoil suction surface, thereby effectively suppressing cavitation. Further analysis shows that positive-going horizontal jet components enhance the lift–drag ratio, while negative-going components have a detrimental effect. Jet arrangements near the trailing edge negatively impact both cavitation suppression and energy performance. These findings provide a valuable reference for selecting optimal injection parameters to achieve a balance between cavitation suppression and energy performance in hydrodynamic systems.
- Open Access
- 9 July 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Water Injection for Cloud Cavitation Suppression: Analysis on the Effects of Injection Parameters
This study investigates cloud cavitation suppression around a model scale NACA66 hydrofoil using active water injection and explores the effect of multiple injection parameters. Numerical simulations and a mixed-level orthogonal test method are employed to systematically analyze the impact of jet angle αjet, jet location Ljet, and jet velocity Ujet on cavitation suppression efficiency and hydrofoil energy performance. The study reveals that jet location has the greatest influence on cavitation suppression, while jet angle has the greatest influence on hydrofoil energy performance. The optimal parameter combination (Ljet = 0.30C, αjet = +60 degrees, Ujet = 3.25 m/s) effectively balances energy performance and cavitation suppression, reducing cavitation volume by 49.34% and improving lift-drag ratio by 8.55%. The study found that the jet's introduction not only enhances vapor condensation and reduces the intensity of the vapor-liquid exchange process but also disrupts the internal structure of cavitation clouds and elevates pressure on the hydrofoil suction surface, thereby effectively suppressing cavitation. Further analysis shows that positive-going horizontal jet components enhance the lift-drag ratio, while negative-going components have a detrimental effect. Jet arrangements near the trailing edge negatively impact both cavitation suppression and energy performance. These findings provide valuable reference for selecting optimal injection parameters to achieve a balance between cavitation suppression and energy performance in hydrodynamic systems.
- 9 July 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessWater Injection for Cloud Cavitation Suppression: Analysis on the Effects of Injection Parameters
This study investigates cloud cavitation suppression around a model scale NACA66 hydrofoil using active water injection and explores the effect of multiple injection parameters. Numerical simulations and a mixed-level orthogonal test method are employed to systematically analyze the impact of jet angle αjet, jet location Ljet, and jet velocity Ujet on cavitation suppression efficiency and hydrofoil energy performance. The study reveals that jet location has the greatest influence on cavitation suppression, while jet angle has the greatest influence on hydrofoil energy performance. The optimal parameter combination (Ljet = 0.30C, αjet = +60 degrees, Ujet = 3.25 m/s) effectively balances energy performance and cavitation suppression, reducing cavitation volume by 49.34% and improving lift-drag ratio by 8.55%. The study found that the jet's introduction not only enhances vapor condensation and reduces the intensity of the vapor-liquid exchange process but also disrupts the internal structure of cavitation clouds and elevates pressure on the hydrofoil suction surface, thereby effectively suppressing cavitation. Further analysis shows that positive-going horizontal jet components enhance the lift-drag ratio, while negative-going components have a detrimental effect. Jet arrangements near the trailing edge negatively impact both cavitation suppression and energy performance. These findings provide valuable reference for selecting optimal injection parameters to achieve a balance between cavitation suppression and energy performance in hydrodynamic systems.