Kevin Fernando

Introduction Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) affects approximately 25% of individuals with diabetes in the UK and remains underdiagnosed and suboptimally managed in primary care. The condition causes chronic pain, limits daily functioning, impairs quality of life, and increases the risk of complications like foot ulcers and amputations due to underlying neuropathy. Current care pathways are fragmented, leading to delays in diagnosis and limited access to evidence-based therapies. This article aims to address the challenges of screening, diagnosis, and management of pDPN in UK primary care by proposing a consensus-driven, five-step pragmatic strategy. Methods An expert panel of general practitioners and a diabetes nurse practitioner from across the UK convened to review and discuss strategies for improving pDPN care. Consensus was reached through an evaluation of barriers in clinical practice, supported by real-world experience and examples of innovative care delivery models, resulting in the development of practical recommendations and workflow. Results Key barriers identified include insufficient training of healthcare professionals in pDPN, underutilisation of validated screening tools such as the DN4 questionnaire, and inconsistent and outdated treatment guidelines. To address these challenges, a five-step approach was proposed to include screening high-risk patients using validated questionnaires, following up on these patients to enable early diagnoses, initiating early treatments with first-line therapies while monitoring responses, referring complex cases to secondary care on the basis of structured criteria, and ensuring coordinated follow-up to streamline and optimise care delivery. Case studies demonstrate the practical application of these strategies in improving early detection, treatment adherence, and long-term care for individuals with pDPN. Conclusion Current practices have fallen short in providing adequate care for one in four individuals with diabetes. Implementing a straightforward five-step approach can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes, reducing the burden of pDPN on both patients and society.

Cardiovascular, kidney and metabolic (CKM) conditions are interrelated, significantly contributing to morbidity, mortality and healthcare burden. Despite therapeutic advances, traditional disease-specific approaches often fail to address their complex interplay. Key therapeutic agents—including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide RAs, sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitors and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) finerenone—offer multi-organ benefits. Emerging therapies, such as triple receptor agonists and second-generation MRAs, target new pathways further expanding treatment options for CKM conditions. A holistic CKM management approach must address and recognise that conditions such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, obstructive sleep apnoea and obesity are part of the CKM spectrum. Frailty assessment is also important alongside CKM conditions, warranting comprehensive geriatric assessment and deprescribing when appropriate. Multidisciplinary care—including lifestyle interventions, pathway redesign, pharmacological advances and novel technologies—is essential for improving outcomes. As the CKM landscape evolves, future strategies should prioritise early intervention, personalised treatment and addressing unmet needs in high-risk populations. This review advocates for an integrated CKM framework, exploring treatment strategies, emerging therapies and technological innovations. It also examines the role of artificial intelligence and digital health tools in risk stratification, early diagnosis and long-term condition management, alongside ethical and regulatory considerations.

Introduction Type 2 diabetes (T2D) imposes significant personal challenges and societal costs. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is recognised as a state-of-the-art tool, but remains underutilised. Adoption of CGM in primary care should be informed by a broader understanding of the technology’s capabilities and limitations. Methods An expert panel was convened to review current literature and clinical experience to provide practical approaches to CGM for primary care practitioners and discuss the technology’s value in the routine management of T2D. The goals were to review and reach consensus on the current state of CGM in non-specialist practice settings and on strategies for successfully initiating and maintaining people on CGM. Results Initiation and maintenance of CGM therapy can be successfully conducted in primary care settings. CGM therapy should include proper patient selection, proper setting of expectations, and evidence-based adjustments to therapy. Most patients are likely to see quick, meaningful, and lasting improvements in their diabetes, along with a better understanding of their condition and greater motivation for successful management. Retrospective report interpretation is feasible and intuitive. Barriers to adoption and sustained use include cost, technological limitations, behavioural or psychological factors, and therapeutic inertia. Addressing these barriers is critical to enable better access to CGM. Continuous glucose monitoring can be leveraged by primary care teams to inform treatment decisions and also by patients to inform diabetes self-management. Conclusion CGM should be considered for all people with T2D. The recommendations provided here should simplify adoption and maintenance use of CGM in primary care and maximise the glycaemic and psychosocial benefits of the technology.

The scientific landscape of treatments for type 2 diabetes (T2D) has changed rapidly in the last decade with newer treatments becoming available. However, a large proportion of people with T2D are not able to achieve glycaemic goals because of clinical inertia. The majority of T2D management is in primary care, where clinicians (medical, nursing and pharmacist staff) play an important role in addressing patient needs and achieving treatment goals. However, management of T2D is challenging because of the heterogeneity of T2D and complexity of comorbidity, time constraints, guidance overload and the evolving treatments. Additionally, the current coronavirus disease pandemic poses additional challenges to the management of chronic diseases such as T2D, including routine access to patients for monitoring and communication. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are a class of agents that have evolved rapidly in recent years. These agents act in a glucose-dependent manner to promote insulin secretion and inhibit glucagon secretion, as well as enhancing satiety and reducing hunger. As a result, they are effective treatment options for people with T2D, achieving glycated haemoglobin reductions, weight loss and potential cardiovascular benefit, as monotherapy or as add-on to other glucose-lowering therapies. However, given the complexity of managing T2D, it is important to equip primary care clinicians with clear information regarding efficacy, safety and appropriate positioning of GLP-1 RA therapies in clinical practice. This review provides a summary of clinical and real-world evidence along with practical guidance, with the aim of aiding primary care clinicians in the initiation and monitoring of GLP-1 RAs to help ensure that desired outcomes are realised. Furthermore, a benefit/risk tool has been developed on the basis of current available evidence and guidelines to support primary care clinicians in selecting individuals who are most likely to benefit from GLP-1 RA therapies, in addition to indicating clinical situations where caution is needed.