HDHugo Dupuis

Hugo Dupuis

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Hugo Dupuis has a total of 163 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Ala Chebbi

    Polyclinique de la région Mantaise, Mantes-la-Jolie, France; Department of urology, Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris, France

    3 shared publications
  • Diana Kassab

    Association française d'urologie, Paris, France

    3 shared publications
  • Eric Huyghe

    Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France; Reproductive Medicine Department, Hôpital Paule-de-Viguier, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; UMR DEFE, Inserm 1203, Université de Toulouse, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France

    3 shared publications
  • Jean-Nicolas Cornu

    Urology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France

    3 shared publications
  • Alexandra Clerget

    Urology Department, Bichat University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France

    2 shared publications
  • Alice Bourillon

    Urology Department, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France

    2 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Risk factors for early penile curvature following surgical repair of penile fracture: A multicenter retrospective study from FRACT’AFUF

    by Paul Sabbagh, André Gillibert, Stéphan Levy, Charly Bacle, William Berchiche, Adrien Boileau, Alice Bourillon, Maxime Chabenes, Elodie Chauveau, Alexandra Clerget, et al.

  • Impact of chemotherapy received prior to testicular tissue cryopreservation on somatic cells from prepubertal to postpubertal males

    by V Rousseau, N Rives, M Basille-Dugay, C Neusius, F Fraissinet, E Chemin, M Dufour, H Dupuis, C Rondanino, A Feraille, et al.

    STUDY QUESTION: Does exposure to first-line chemotherapies affect the density and maturity status of testicular somatic cells from prepubertal to postpubertal males at the time of cryopreservation? SUMMARY ANSWER: Chemotherapy exposures, particularly high doses of alkylating agents, are associated with alterations in immunohistochemical markers of testicular somatic cell density and maturation, including SOX9 for Sertoli cell density, COUP-TFII for peritubular myoid cell maturation, and CYP11A1 and INSL3 for Leydig cell maturation, with the related effects becoming more nuanced when age and underlying pathology are considered. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The increased survival rates following cancer treatment highlight the importance of integrating fertility preservation, whether through sperm cryopreservation in pubertal and postpubertal males or testicular tissue freezing (TTF), which is now established for prepubertal and peripubertal boys. Although induction chemotherapy is known to impair germ cells, its effects on somatic cells (Sertoli, peritubular myoid, and Leydig cells) within testicular tissue collected after exposure to chemotherapeutic drugs remain largely unexplored. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective study included testicular tissue samples from 51 patients from prepubertal to postpubertal males diagnosed with cancer, aged between 6 months and 33 years. Their medical diagnoses and previous chemotherapy exposures were recorded. We examined histological sections of testicular tissue to assess the impact of chemotherapy on somatic cell density and maturity status. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The density and maturity status of testicular somatic cells were assessed by immunofluorescent staining. The analyses were performed on fresh testicular tissue fragments from prepubertal and postpubertal males with cancer who had undergone TTF prior to conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. All had received first-line chemotherapies. In addition, the functionality of somatic cells was assessed using hormone serum levels that reflect their endocrine activity, to provide a better understanding of the functional integrity of the testicular environment. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: This study investigated the impact of chemotherapy drug exposure and cancer type on testicular somatic cells in boys. Patients were categorized based on their exposure to specific chemotherapeutic drugs, including carboplatin, other alkylating agents, anthracyclines, vincristine, and cytarabine. High cumulative exposure to alkylating agents, defined as a cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED) ≥ 8000 mg/m², led to a decrease in COUP-TFII expression in peritubular myoid cells and CYP11A1 in Leydig cells (P = 0.038 and P = 0.013, respectively). Additionally, INSL3 expression in Leydig cells declined with increasing CED (r = −0.33, P = 0.019), independently of the patients’ age. Exposure to anthracyclines was also associated with reduced INSL3 (P = 0.027), although this association did not persist after CED adjustment. Combined exposure to alkylating agents and anthracyclines further decreased SOX9+ Sertoli cells (P = 0.021), whereas vincristine showed no additive deleterious effect. An alteration in Leydig cell maturation was observed in patients treated for neuroblastoma, highlighting the impact of the disease itself on testicular tissue. Hormonal analyses indicated no significant impact of induction chemotherapy on somatic cell functionality. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Histological data were obtained from testicular tissue of patients exposed to chemotherapy treatments, mostly prepubertal fragments, with no healthy controls being available. Analyses included histology and hormonal profiling; molecular studies were not performed due to limited tissue cryopreserved for future fertility restoration. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study provides valuable information on the impact of chemotherapy on testicular somatic cells in patients. Because somatic cells are essential for supporting spermatogenesis, the preservation of the testicular microenvironment after chemotherapy is a reassuring prospect for patients considering future fertility restoration approaches. FUNDING: This work was funded by a PhD grant by La Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer [to V.R.] as well as financial contributions from University of Rouen Normandy, Rouen University Hospital, and the Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB). Additional fundings were provided by French National Research Agency (ANR-21-CE14-0068) [to N.R.], French Biomedicine Agency [to A.F.], GIRCI NO [to A.F.], Laurette Fugain’s Association [to L.D.], Rouen Normandy Metropolis [to L.D.], and Priority Research Programs and Equipment (PEPR): Women’s Health, Couples’ Health (SAFE). The funding sources had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing of the manuscript. DISCLOSURES: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.


  • Postoperative management after penile fracture surgery: Intraoperative drainage is not associated with early morbidity reduction after penile fracture repair (FRACT AFUF project)

    by Norbert De Brek, Arthur Peyrottes, Charles Dariane, Maxime Pattou, Alexandra Clerget, François Desgrandchamps, Paul Sabbagh, Hugo Dupuis, Louise Duffaut, Igor Duquesne, et al.

  • Oral drug treatments of erectile dysfunction: A AFU/SFMS systematic review

    by Ala Chebbi, Hugo Dupuis, Diana Kassab, Carol Burte, Eric Huyghe, Ludovic Ferretti


  • Fertility preservation in men with spinal cord injury: The 2025 French guidelines

    by Cyrille Guillot-Tantay, Diana Kassab, Claire De Vienne, Ismaël Chelghaf, Pierre-Luc Dequirez, Hugo Dupuis, Charles Mazeaud, Aurélie Schirmann, Alexia Even, François Marcelli, et al.


  • Combination Pharmacotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Evaluation of Existing Literature on Combination Therapies for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with BPH

    by Joséphine Papet, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Hugo Dupuis

    Objective Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) significantly impact quality of life in aging men. While monotherapies, including alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI), or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), are widely used, the potential benefits and risks of combination pharmacotherapies remain less well-documented. This study reviews and assesses the current evidence regarding the use of combination pharmacotherapies in the management of BPH-related LUTS to provide a comprehensive overview of their efficacy and safety profiles. Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to June 2024. Studies were selected on the basis of predefined inclusion criteria, focusing on clinical outcomes such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urinary flow rate (Qmax), and quality of life. Data from 22 eligible studies were analyzed and summarized. Results Combination therapies, particularly those involving alpha-blockers and 5-ARI, demonstrated significant reductions in clinical progression, improvements in urinary flow, and symptom relief compared with monotherapies. Therapies combining alpha-blockers with anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or phytotherapeutic agents showed potential for targeting mixed symptoms, though evidence remains limited. Triple therapy studies are scarce, with benefits observed only in highly symptomatic or refractory cases. Conclusions Combination therapies for LUTS/BPH offer superior efficacy over monotherapy in certain cases, particularly with alpha-blockers and 5-ARI, which significantly reduce disease progression and symptoms. Other combinations, including alpha-blockers with anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or PDE5 inhibitors, provide potential benefits for patients with mixed symptom profiles, though evidence remains heterogeneous. The level of evidence among studies varies significantly, ranging from high-quality RCTs to lower-level observational data, requiring careful interpretation. While combination treatments improve outcomes, they also present challenges in adherence and side effects. A personalized and evidence-based approach is essential to optimize treatment selection and balance efficacy with tolerability.


  • Therapeutic management of erectile dysfunction: The AFU/SFMS guidelines

    by Eric Huyghe, Diana Kassab, Jean Pierre Graziana, Antoine Faix, Laure Grellet, Nadjia Schoentgen, Astrid Boulenger de Hauteclocque, Hugo Dupuis, Ala Chebbi, Ismael Chelghaf, et al.


  • Open Access

    Risk Factors for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Explantation and Erosion in Male Nonneurological Patients

    by Alice Pitout, Pierre Lecoanet, Charles Mazeaud, Victor Gaillard, Baptiste Poussot, Thibault Tricard, Christian Saussine, Thibaut Brierre, Xavier Game, Florian Beraud, et al.

    Purpose: This study was performed to assess the risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) explantation in a large multicenter cohort.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records for all 1,233 implantations of the AMS-800 AUS device in male nonneurological patients from 2005 to 2020 across 13 French centers. Patients with neurological conditions were excluded from the study. To identify factors associated with explantation-free survival, survival analysis was performed. Explantation was defined as the complete removal of the device, whereas revision referred to the replacement of the device or its components.Results: The study included 1,107 patients, of whom 281 underwent AUS explantation. The median survival without explantation was 83 months. The leading causes of explantation were infection and erosion. Univariate analysis revealed several significant risk factors for explantation: age above 75 years (34.6% in the explanted group vs. 25.8% in the nonexplanted group, P=0.007), history of radiotherapy (43.5% vs. 31.3%, P=0.001), and anticoagulant use (15% vs. 8.6%, P<0.001). In logistic regression analysis, the only significant risk factor was previous radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 2.05; P<0.05). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed 2 factors associated with earlier explantation: transcorporal cuff implantation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.67; P=0.01) and the annual caseload of the center (HR, 1.08; P=0.02). When specifically examining explantation due to erosion, radiotherapy was the sole factor significantly associated with the risk of erosion (OR, 2.47; P<0.05) as well as earlier erosion (HR, 1.90; P=0.039).Conclusions: In this series, conducted in a real-world setting across multiple centers with different volumes and levels of expertise, the median survival without AUS explantation was 83 months. This study confirms that radiotherapy represents the primary independent risk factor for AUS erosion in male nonneurological patients.


  • Clinical impact of an enhanced recovery protocol implementation for nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy

    by Lucie Vangheluwe, Mathilde Legeay, Louis Surlemont, Hugo Dupuis, Guillaume Defortescu, Jean Nicolas Cornu, Christian Pfister


  • Differential impact of COVID-19 on urological surgeries in public and private institutions between 2019 and 2021 in France

    by M. Brument, G. Defortescu, H. Bugel, L. Sibert, T. Duflot, H. Dupuis, L. Surlemont, C. Pfister, J.-N. Cornu