Ravi Tejwani

When human instructors guide learners through motor tasks, they seamlessly coordinate physical touch with verbal explanations - a dance teacher positions a student's arms while describing the movement, a therapist supports a patient's limb while offering encouragement. In contrast, a robot applying physical forces without verbal context can feel invasive or unsettling to humans. We present a robot guidance controller that learns to coordinate physical and verbal guidance as human instructors naturally do. Our system adaptively balances these modalities based on real-time estimation of human compliance: when learners struggle, it provides firmer physical corrections with explicit instructions; as they improve, it transitions to lighter touch with encouraging phrases. Our method comprises three components: (1) an estimator that infers physical and verbal compliance from tracking errors, (2) an optimization method that dynamically allocates guidance between force and language, and (3) a force-to-language model that generates contextually appropriate utterances. User studies (N=12) demonstrate that adaptive coordination of guidance significantly outperforms single-modality guidance and fixed-combination baselines: up to 50% reduction in tracking error, 39% improvement in movement smoothness, and 27% faster task completion. While validated in rehabilitation therapy, our approach generalizes to any human-robot collaborative learning scenario.

Humans and animals engage in rich social interactions. It is often theorized that a relatively small number of basic social interactions give rise to the full range of behavior observed. But no computational theory explaining how social interactions combine together has been proposed before. We do so here. We take a model, the Social MDP, which is able to express a range of social interactions, and extend it to represent linear combinations of social interactions. Practically for robotics applications, such models are now able to not just express that an agent should help another agent, but to express goal-centric social interactions. Perhaps an agent is helping someone get dressed, but preventing them from falling, and is happy to exchange stories in the meantime. How an agent responds socially, should depend on what it thinks the other agent is doing at that point in time. To encode this notion, we take linear combinations of social interactions as defined in Social MDPs, and compute the weights on those combinations on the fly depending on the estimated goals of other agents. This new model, the Linear Social MDP, enables zero-shot reasoning about complex social interactions, provides a mathematical basis for the long-standing intuition that social interactions should compose, and leads to interesting new behaviors that we validate using human observers. Complex social interactions are part of the future of intelligent agents, and having principled mathematical models built on a foundation like MDPs will make it possible to bring social interactions to every robotic application.

In this work, we compare different neural topic modeling methods in learning the topical propensities of different psychiatric conditions from the psychotherapy session transcripts parsed from speech recordings. We also incorporate temporal modeling to put this additional interpretability to action by parsing out topic similarities as a time series in a turn-level resolution. We believe this topic modeling framework can offer interpretable insights for the therapist to optimally decide his or her strategy and improve psychotherapy effectiveness.

Much of what we do as humans is engage socially with other agents, a skill that robots must also eventually possess. We demonstrate that a rich theory of social interactions originating from microsociology and economics can be formalized by extending a nested MDP where agents reason about arbitrary functions of each other's hidden rewards. This extended Social MDP allows us to encode the five basic interactions that underlie microsociology: cooperation, conflict, coercion, competition, and exchange. The result is a robotic agent capable of executing social interactions zero-shot in new environments; like humans it can engage socially in novel ways even without a single example of that social interaction. Moreover, the judgments of these Social MDPs align closely with those of humans when considering which social interaction is taking place in an environment. This method both sheds light on the nature of social interactions, by providing concrete mathematical definitions, and brings rich social interactions into a mathematical framework that has proven to be natural for robotics, MDPs.

Conversational AI agents are becoming ubiquitous and provide assistance to us in our everyday activities. In recent years, researchers have explored the migration of these agents across different embodiments in order to maintain the continuity of the task and improve user experience. In this paper, we investigate user's affective responses in different configurations of the migration parameters. We present a 2x2 between-subjects study in a task-based scenario using information migration and identity migration as parameters. We outline the affect processing pipeline from the video footage collected during the study and report user's responses in each condition. Our results show that users reported highest joy and were most surprised when both the information and identity was migrated; and reported most anger when the information was migrated without the identity of their agent.