Leah Ingeno
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Leah Ingeno has a total of 35 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexis Sullivan
Durham North Carolina 27701 FHI 360
1 shared publication Alicia Mendez
Two Oceans in Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
1 shared publication- Alison Edelman
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
1 shared publication - Amelia C. L. Mackenzie
Global Health and Population
1 shared publication - Angely Catano
Santo Domingo 10205 Two Oceans in Health
1 shared publication Anne M. Teitelman
School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Claire M. Fagin Hall, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Defining a person-centered conceptual model to inform measurement of contraception’s effects on the menstrual cycle
Objective: To address the need for improved measurement of the ways contraception impacts the baseline menstrual cycle (i.e., contraceptive-induced menstrual changes; CIMCs) by assembling an interdisciplinary, global research collective to rigorously develop a person-centered measure for CIMCs in multiple languages. As the first step, this paper reports on our conceptual model development, which is the foundation for ongoing measure development. Study design: We conducted 18 focus groups with 106 people experiencing CIMCs while using hormonal or intrauterine contraception in Durban, South Africa, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and Portland Oregon, United States. We used a virtual affinity mapping approach to analyze qualitative data, which was the basis of our conceptual model along with relevant theory and related models in the literature. Results: The conceptual model of experiences with CIMCs depicts the baseline menstrual cycle, including CIMCs and conceptually-linked effects and the impacts and perceptions of those CIMCs. We found key domains of changes in pain, bleeding volume, bleeding patterns, and characteristics of blood. Conclusion: Our CIMC conceptual model will inform development of a measure with evidence of validation across three language and global contexts. Adoption of a person-centered, standardized CIMC measurement across trials will improve knowledge and decision-making between methods. Implications: Defining an evidenced-based conceptual model for CIMCs expands our understanding of how contraceptive users experience and understand menstruation and CIMCs. We can use this model to improve and standardize measurement of CIMCs.
Open AccessDefining a person-centered conceptual model to inform measurement of contraception’s effects on the menstrual cycle
Objective: To address the need for improved measurement of the ways contraception impacts the baseline menstrual cycle (i.e., contraceptive-induced menstrual changes; CIMCs) by assembling an interdisciplinary, global research collective to rigorously develop a person-centered measure for CIMCs in multiple languages. As the first step, this paper reports on our conceptual model development, which is the foundation for ongoing measure development. Study design: We conducted 18 focus groups with 106 people experiencing CIMCs while using hormonal or intrauterine contraception in Durban, South Africa, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and Portland Oregon, United States. We used a virtual affinity mapping approach to analyze qualitative data, which was the basis of our conceptual model along with relevant theory and related models in the literature. Results: The conceptual model of experiences with CIMCs depicts the baseline menstrual cycle, including CIMCs and conceptually-linked effects and the impacts and perceptions of those CIMCs. We found key domains of changes in pain, bleeding volume, bleeding patterns, and characteristics of blood. Conclusion: Our CIMC conceptual model will inform development of a measure with evidence of validation across three language and global contexts. Adoption of a person-centered, standardized CIMC measurement across trials will improve knowledge and decision-making between methods. Implications: Defining an evidenced-based conceptual model for CIMCs expands our understanding of how contraceptive users experience and understand menstruation and CIMCs. We can use this model to improve and standardize measurement of CIMCs.
- 5 January 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Women's Health Issues
- Vol. 32 (4) , 388-394
Incorporating HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care for Patients Seeking Induced Abortion and Pregnancy Loss Management
- 5 January 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Women's Health Issues
- Vol. 32 (4) , 388-394
Incorporating HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care for Patients Seeking Induced Abortion and Pregnancy Loss Management