YFYuzhe Fu

Yuzhe Fu

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Yuzhe Fu has a total of 31 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Vortex: Bridging Extreme Compression and Efficient LLM Inference

    by Haoxuan Shan, Cong Guo, Bowen Duan, Chiyue Wei, Feng Cheng, Yuzhe Fu, Yintao He, Hai Li, Yiran Chen

  • Open Access

    FlashFPS: Efficient Farthest Point Sampling for Large-Scale Point Clouds via Pruning and Caching

    by Yuzhe Fu, Hancheng Ye, Cong Guo, Junyao Zhang, Qinsi Wang, Yueqian Lin, Changchun Zhou, Hai (Helen) Li, Yiran Chen

  • Open Access

    Generative AI at the Edge: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Hardware and Applications

    by Mozhgan Navardi, Yuzhe Fu, Yueqian Lin, Hai Li, Yiran Chen, Tinoosh Mohsenin

    Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) leverages generative models, including Diffusion models and Foundation Models (FMs) such as Large Language Models (LLMs), to generate new data. GenAI has attracted growing attention as it enables applications such as text generation, image synthesis, and multimodal reasoning. However, deploying such GenAI models on resource-constrained edge devices poses key challenges. Edge devices typically have limited computational power and strict energy budgets. They also face the memory-wall problem, where the cost of moving data between memory and compute units exceeds the cost of computation itself. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of techniques that enable GenAI deployment at the edge, covering software optimizations, hardware innovations, and system-level frameworks. While all three categories are discussed, particular emphasis is given to hardware-focused approaches. We review recent hardware studies and classify them into three main levels: computation, memory, and scheduling, with eight finer-grained subcategories that capture the mainstream hardware techniques. Many of these are hardware–software co-design strategies that align GenAI workloads with edge resource constraints. By synthesizing state-of-the-art solutions and identifying open challenges, this survey outlines a roadmap for building efficient GenAI systems at the edge.

  • Open Access

    Frame Skipping Architecture for Video-Language Model Acceleration

    by Haoxuan Shan, Chiyue Wei, Cong Guo, Yuzhe Fu, Tian Liang, Hai Li, Yiran Chen

  • Open Access

    GenAI at the Edge: Comprehensive Survey on Empowering Edge Devices

    by Mozhgan Navardi, Romina Aalishah, Yuzhe Fu, Yueqian Lin, Hai Li, Yiran Chen, Tinoosh Mohsenin

    Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) applies models and algorithms such as Large Language Models (LLMs) and Foundation Models (FMs) to generate new data. GenAI, as a promising approach, enables advanced capabilities in various applications, including text generation and image processing. In current practice, GenAI algorithms run mainly on cloud servers, leading to high latency and raising security concerns. Consequently, these challenges encourage the deployment of GenAI algorithms directly on edge devices. However, the large size of such models and their significant computational resource requirements pose obstacles when deploying them in resource-constrained systems. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of recently proposed techniques that optimize GenAI for efficient deployment on resource-constrained edge devices. To this end, this work highlights three main categories for bringing GenAI to the edge: software optimization, hardware optimization, and frameworks. The main takeaway for readers of this survey will be a clear roadmap to design, implement, and refine GenAI systems for real-world implementation on edge devices.

  • SoftAct: A High-Precision Softmax Architecture for Transformers Supporting Nonlinear Functions

    by Yuzhe Fu, Changchun Zhou, Tianling Huang, Eryi Han, Yifan He, Hailong Jiao

    Transformer-based deep learning networks are revolutionizing our society. The convolution and attention co-designed (CAC) Transformers have demonstrated superior performance compared to the conventional Transformer-based networks. However, CAC Transformer networks contain various nonlinear functions, such as softmax and complex activation functions, which require high precision hardware design yet typically with significant cost in area and power consumption. To address these challenges, SoftAct , a compact and high-precision algorithm-hardware co-designed architecture, is proposed to implement both softmax and nonlinear activation functions in CAC Transformer accelerators. An improved softmax algorithm with penalties is proposed to maintain precision in hardware. A stage-wise full zero detection method is developed to skip redundant computation in softmax. A compact and reconfigurable architecture with a symmetrically designed linear fitting module is proposed to achieve nonlinear functions. The SoftAct architecture is designed in an industrial 28-nm CMOS technology with the MobileViT-xxs network classifying the ImageNet-1k dataset as the benchmark. Compared with the state of the art, SoftAct improves up to 5.87% network accuracy under 8-bit quantization, 153.2× area efficiency, and 1435× overall efficiency.


  • Adjustable Multi-Stream Block-Wise Farthest Point Sampling Acceleration in Point Cloud Analysis

    by Changchun Zhou, Yuzhe Fu, Yanzhe Ma, Eryi Han, Yifan He, Hailong Jiao

    Point cloud is increasingly used in a variety of applications. Farthest Point Sampling (FPS) is typically employed for down-sampling to reduce the size of point cloud and enhance the representational capability by preserving contour points in point cloud analysis. However, due to low parallelism and high computational complexity, high energy consumption and long latency are caused, which becomes a bottleneck of hardware acceleration. In this brief, we propose an adjustable multi-stream block-wise FPS algorithm, adjusted by four configurable parameters, according to hardware and accuracy requirements. A unified hardware architecture with one parameter is designed to implement the adjustable multi-stream block-wise FPS algorithm. Furthermore, we present a rapid searching algorithm to select the optimal configuration of the five parameters. Designed in an industrial 28-nm CMOS technology, the proposed hardware architecture achieves a latency of 0.005 (1.401) ms and a frame energy consumption of 0.09 (27.265) μJ/frame for 1 k (24 k) input points at 200 MHz and 0.9 V supply voltage. Compared to the state of the art, the proposed hardware architecture reduces the latency by up to 99.9%, saves the energy consumption by up to 99.5%, and improves the network accuracy by up to 9.34%.


  • Sagitta: An Energy-Efficient Sparse 3D-CNN Accelerator for Real-Time 3-D Understanding

    by Changchun Zhou, Min Liu, Siyuan Qiu, Xugang Cao, Yuzhe Fu, Yifan He, Hailong Jiao

    Three-dimensional (3D) understanding or inference has received increasing attention, where 3D convolutional neural networks (3D-CNNs) have demonstrated superior performance compared to two-dimensional CNNs (2D-CNNs), since 3D-CNNs learn features from all three dimensions. However, 3D-CNNs suffer from intensive computation and data movement. In this paper, Sagitta, an energy-efficient low-latency on-chip 3D-CNN accelerator, is proposed for edge devices. Locality and small differential value dropout are leveraged to increase the sparsity of activations. A full-zero-skipping convolutional microarchitecture is proposed to fully utilize the sparsity of weights and activations. A hierarchical load-balancing scheme is also introduced to increase the hardware utilization. Specialized architecture and computation flow are proposed to enhance the effectiveness of the proposed techniques. Fabricated in a 55-nm CMOS technology, Sagitta achieves 3.8 TOPS/W for C3D at a latency of 0.1 s and 4.5 TOPS/W for 3D U-Net at a latency of 0.9 s at 100 MHz and 0.91 V supply voltage. Compared to the state-of-the-art 3D-CNN and 2D-CNN accelerators, Sagitta enhances the energy efficiency by up to 379.6× and 11×, respectively.


  • A 4.29nJ/pixel Stereo Depth Coprocessor With Pixel Level Pipeline and Region Optimized Semi-Global Matching for IoT Application

    by Pingcheng Dong, Zhuoyu Chen, Zhuoao Li, Yuzhe Fu, Lei Chen, Fengwei An

    The semi-global matching (SGM) algorithm in stereo vision is a well-known depth-estimation method since it can generate dense and robust disparity maps. However, the real-time processing and low power dissipation, the specifications of the Internet-of-Thing (IoT) applications, are challenging for their computational complexity. In this paper, we propose a hardware-oriented SGM algorithm with pixel-level pipeline and region-optimized cost aggregation for high-speed processing and low hardware-resource usage. Firstly, the matching costs in a region are integrated with an optimization strategy to significantly reduce memory usage and improve the processing speed of the cost aggregation. Then, a two-layer parallel two-stage pipeline (TPTP) architecture, which enables pixel-level processing, is designed to calculate two directions (0° and 135°) aggregation to further solve the crucial computational bottleneck of the SGM algorithm. Finally, the architecture is demonstrated on a low-cost XILINX Spartan-7 device and an advanced Stratix-V FPGA device for VGA ( $640\times 480$ ) depth estimation. The experimental results show that the proposed architecture with compact hardware architecture also ensures accuracy. The pixel-level pipeline architecture enables a processing speed of 355 frames per second (fps) at 109MHz on the Spartan-7 FPGA device and 508 fps at 156MHz on the Stratix-V FPGA. Besides, the coprocessor respectively achieves an energy efficiency of 4.74 nJ/pixel with a power dissipation of 517mW and 4.29nJ/pixel with a power dissipation of 669mW on these two FPGAs.