Mathias Leiter
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Mathias Leiter has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Hubert Hasenauer
Institute of Silviculture, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
4 shared publications Harald Vacik
2 shared publicationsHubert Hasenauer
2 shared publicationsManfred J. Lexer
2 shared publications- Mehmed Čilaš
Chair for Silviculture and Urban Greenery, University of Sarajevo – Faculty of Forestry Sarajevo , Zagrebačka 20, 71000 Sarajevo
2 shared publications Aida Ibrahimspahić
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 2 August 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Trees, Forests and People
- Vol. 27
Old-growth versus selection forest management in mixed fir–beech forests: Insights from 70 years of monitoring in the Dinaric Mountains
- 2 August 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Trees, Forests and People
- Vol. 27
Open AccessOld-growth versus selection forest management in mixed fir–beech forests: Insights from 70 years of monitoring in the Dinaric Mountains
- Open Access
- 1 April 2025
- Published by KEAI Publishing in Forest Ecosystems
- Vol. 12
Identifying suitable areas for plenter forest management
- 1 April 2025
- Published by KEAI Publishing in Forest Ecosystems
- Vol. 12
Open AccessIdentifying suitable areas for plenter forest management
- Open Access
- 20 January 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
Navigating Climate Change: Exploring Plenter Forest Potential in Styria, Austria
Forests stand at the forefront of climate change adaptation strategies, with their ability to sequester and store carbon, sustain bioeconomies, foster biodiversity, and provide a whole range of other ecosystem services. There is an increasing trend of promoting this multipurpose functionality of forests, resulting in a shift towards silvicultural practices that differ heavily from the now dominant even-aged, clear-cut forestry. One of these alternative management practices to promote multipurpose functionality is plenter forest management, a type of uneven-aged selection cutting system. Only little is known about the applicability of this management system on a regional or national scale. Therefore, this study assesses the potential expansion of plenter forest management, crucial for climate change mitigation. Focusing on tree species suitability, harvesting constraints, and road accessibility, we analysed factors impacting plenter management for the Austrian province of Styria for current and future climate conditions. Our findings reveal that while current forestry predominantly features even-aged Norway spruce, approximately 14% of the forest area could be managed as mixed-species plenter forests under current conditions. This research contributes to understanding potential in transforming forest practices for enhanced biodiversity, ecosystem services, and climate resilience on a regional scale.
- 20 January 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
Open AccessNavigating Climate Change: Exploring Plenter Forest Potential in Styria, Austria
Forests stand at the forefront of climate change adaptation strategies, with their ability to sequester and store carbon, sustain bioeconomies, foster biodiversity, and provide a whole range of other ecosystem services. There is an increasing trend of promoting this multipurpose functionality of forests, resulting in a shift towards silvicultural practices that differ heavily from the now dominant even-aged, clear-cut forestry. One of these alternative management practices to promote multipurpose functionality is plenter forest management, a type of uneven-aged selection cutting system. Only little is known about the applicability of this management system on a regional or national scale. Therefore, this study assesses the potential expansion of plenter forest management, crucial for climate change mitigation. Focusing on tree species suitability, harvesting constraints, and road accessibility, we analysed factors impacting plenter management for the Austrian province of Styria for current and future climate conditions. Our findings reveal that while current forestry predominantly features even-aged Norway spruce, approximately 14% of the forest area could be managed as mixed-species plenter forests under current conditions. This research contributes to understanding potential in transforming forest practices for enhanced biodiversity, ecosystem services, and climate resilience on a regional scale.
- Open Access
- 11 September 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Trees, Forests and People
- Vol. 14
Adapting the tree growth model MOSES to manage uneven-aged mixed species forests in Bosnia & Herzegovina
- 11 September 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Trees, Forests and People
- Vol. 14
Open AccessAdapting the tree growth model MOSES to manage uneven-aged mixed species forests in Bosnia & Herzegovina
- Open Access
- 28 July 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Trees, Forests and People
- Vol. 13, 100419
Continuous cover forestry: Which sampling method should be used to ensure sustainable management?
- 28 July 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Trees, Forests and People
- Vol. 13, 100419
Open AccessContinuous cover forestry: Which sampling method should be used to ensure sustainable management?
- Open Access
Assessing the Resource Potential of Mountainous Forests: A Comparison between Austria and Japan
Domestic wood production in Japan is low, and more than 60% of the wood consumed is imported. This is surprising because two-thirds of Japan’s land area is covered by forests. The dominant explanations for this low wood self-sufficiency rate are the lack of forest road infrastructure and the small-scale forest ownership structure. Austria is a country that is similar in topography and ownership structure but has a high wood self-sufficiency rate. Therefore, previous research has compared Japan to Austria. However, these studies did not address basic forest properties in much detail. This study uses national forest inventory data from both countries to assess the forest structures and utilization percentages of the annual wood increment. In contrast to the hypothesis, the results show that the two countries have similar increment rates. In contrast to former studies, the findings indicate that Japanese plantation forests have a higher timber stocking volume than Austrian forests. In Japan, the proportion of the standing volume in the 40–60-year-old age class is much higher compared to the other age classes, indicating an unbalanced growing stock. The results show that the utilization percentage is much higher in Austria (88%) than in Japan (53%). Therefore, the Japanese forest sector has a high potential to increase the harvest of wood.
Open AccessAssessing the Resource Potential of Mountainous Forests: A Comparison between Austria and Japan
Domestic wood production in Japan is low, and more than 60% of the wood consumed is imported. This is surprising because two-thirds of Japan’s land area is covered by forests. The dominant explanations for this low wood self-sufficiency rate are the lack of forest road infrastructure and the small-scale forest ownership structure. Austria is a country that is similar in topography and ownership structure but has a high wood self-sufficiency rate. Therefore, previous research has compared Japan to Austria. However, these studies did not address basic forest properties in much detail. This study uses national forest inventory data from both countries to assess the forest structures and utilization percentages of the annual wood increment. In contrast to the hypothesis, the results show that the two countries have similar increment rates. In contrast to former studies, the findings indicate that Japanese plantation forests have a higher timber stocking volume than Austrian forests. In Japan, the proportion of the standing volume in the 40–60-year-old age class is much higher compared to the other age classes, indicating an unbalanced growing stock. The results show that the utilization percentage is much higher in Austria (88%) than in Japan (53%). Therefore, the Japanese forest sector has a high potential to increase the harvest of wood.