Caroline Coulon

Faced with the pandemic viral circulation of SARS-CoV-2, healthcare establishments have had to maintain an effective screening strategy in order to prevent nosocomial clusters. Automated antigenic tests appear to be a reliable and complementary alternative to RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) in order to optimize patient care in the emergency department. We report our experience of the deployment of the LumiraDx antigen tests on the LumiraDx platform, as well as the comparison of these tests’ results with the RT-PCR results on a population of patients sampled in the emergency department.

Objectives: Aldosterone and renin determinations play an important role in the etiological diagnosis of secondary hypertension. The analytical performances of new aldosterone and renin immunoassays on the Lumipulse G600II^® system (Fujierbio) were investigated and compared with those of the iSYS^® system (IDS) on patients concerned by medical investigations in a context of suspected or proven Primary aldosteronism. Methods: By using the Lumipulse^® G Aldosterone and Renin assays we performed imprecision study, linearity and method comparison (n=107). Accuracy of this new renin assay was tested using the International Standard (WHO IS 68/356). We also assessed the equivalence of the different samples types (n=29). Results: The imprecision evaluation showed all CVs ® G Aldosterone and Renin assays respectively. The linearity was excellent over the clinical range and the comparison with the iSYS^® assays (n=79) showed a strong correlation (R²=1) despite a slight tendency to underestimation (bias of −17.53 pg/mL or 48.56 pmol/L for aldosterone and −15.395 pg/mL for renin). Moreover, the contingency studies based on diagnostic criteria showed that Lumipulse^® G results lead to the same clinical diagnosis that iSYS^® results. A clear correlation was obtained between EDTA and heparin plasma as well as with the serum for all range of measures. Conclusions: The Lumipulse^® G Aldosterone and Renin assays present performances compatible with a routine use in medical laboratories. The precise quantification in the low range can be of interest in some clinical contexts especially standing/laying tests. However, the standardisation against the WHO International Standard Renin would be advisable.

Background: Point-of-care testing (POCT) provides shorter turn-around times and, in many cases, potentially improves medical decision making. The AQT90 FLEX^® benchtop immunoanalyzer (Radiometer Medical ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark) allows for the determination of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (βhCG) in 18 min. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of measuring βhCG using the AQT90 analyzer in the gynecology emergency department (ED) compared to the standard practice of using central laboratory blood testing on the patient length of stay (LOS). Methods: The evaluation consisted of two parts. The first one, conducted in the central laboratory, focused on the analytical performances of the AQT βhCG assay. The second one, conducted in the ED, aimed at determining the impact of POCT βhCG implementation on the timeframe in which ED patients require βhCG assessment. Results: The within-lab imprecisions at the mean values of 17 and 287 IU/L were 2.7% and 3.7%, respectively. Using Deming regression (n = 60), the following equation was obtained in the central lab: AQT90 βhCG = 1.1 Roche βhCG—12.9 (r = 0.997). The implementation of POCT βhCG in the ED significantly reduced patient LOS (145 (90–212) min vs. 205 (155–265) with and without AQT90, respectively, p < 0.001). At the 2 IU/L decision level, a 99.7% agreement with the Roche assay was reported (kappa statistics, 0.99). Conclusions: We confirm that the analytical qualities of the AQT 90 were in line with those obtained in the central lab. The implementation of the POCT βhCG is associated with a shorter LOS in the ED due to the faster availability of the results and the faster decision-making possibilities.