Samuel Oakden
Samuel Oakden has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anjum Naweed
Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
2 shared publications - David Pearson
School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University – Sydney Campus
2 shared publications - Esther Landells
CQUniversity - Adelaide Campus
2 shared publications - Gamithri Gayana Karunasena
End Food Waste Cooperative Research Centre, Adelaide, 5064, Australia; School of Business and Law, CQ University, Sydney, 2000, Australia
2 shared publications David Pearson
1 shared publication- Jayanath Ananda
School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Melbourne, Australia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 471
Breaking bread: Assessment of household bread waste incidence and behavioural drivers
- 10 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 471
Open AccessBreaking bread: Assessment of household bread waste incidence and behavioural drivers
- Open Access
- 4 April 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 357, 120717
Food waste tectonics: Points of friction between policy push and practice pull in council-led household-food-waste interventions in Australia
- 4 April 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 357, 120717
Open AccessFood waste tectonics: Points of friction between policy push and practice pull in council-led household-food-waste interventions in Australia
- Open Access
- 15 July 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 14 (14) , 8699
Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Using Post-Kerbside Organics Treatment Systems to Engage Australian Communities with Pro-Environmental Household Food Waste Behaviours
Dealing with the wicked problem of global food waste and loss is a complex and challenging area. In Australia, increased political will has landed the diversion of domestic food waste from landfill squarely at the feet of local government (councils), often requiring significant change to kerbside collections systems. This paper discusses how post-kerbside household food waste treatment systems can encourage pro-environmental behaviours. To achieve this, current food waste literature is examined against kerbside domestic waste collection measurable outcomes (diversion rates, system uptake and contamination rates). The hypothesis is that specific interventions can establish, or rebuild, community trust, responsibility and pro-environmental behaviours around food waste avoidance and diversion. Two post-kerbside systems—commercial composting and anaerobic digestion—provided the framework. Two themes emerged from the study: (1) the benefits of connecting the community with the interactions of household food waste inputs with post-treatment outputs (compost, soil conditioners, digestates and biogases); and (2) providing engaged communities with pathways for sustainable, pro-environmental actions whilst normalizing correct kerbside food waste recycling for the less engaged (habitual behaviours, knowledge and cooperation). The paper contributes to understanding how councils can connect their communities with the issues of household food waste.
- 15 July 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 14 (14) , 8699
Open AccessOut of Sight, Out of Mind: Using Post-Kerbside Organics Treatment Systems to Engage Australian Communities with Pro-Environmental Household Food Waste Behaviours
Dealing with the wicked problem of global food waste and loss is a complex and challenging area. In Australia, increased political will has landed the diversion of domestic food waste from landfill squarely at the feet of local government (councils), often requiring significant change to kerbside collections systems. This paper discusses how post-kerbside household food waste treatment systems can encourage pro-environmental behaviours. To achieve this, current food waste literature is examined against kerbside domestic waste collection measurable outcomes (diversion rates, system uptake and contamination rates). The hypothesis is that specific interventions can establish, or rebuild, community trust, responsibility and pro-environmental behaviours around food waste avoidance and diversion. Two post-kerbside systems—commercial composting and anaerobic digestion—provided the framework. Two themes emerged from the study: (1) the benefits of connecting the community with the interactions of household food waste inputs with post-treatment outputs (compost, soil conditioners, digestates and biogases); and (2) providing engaged communities with pathways for sustainable, pro-environmental actions whilst normalizing correct kerbside food waste recycling for the less engaged (habitual behaviours, knowledge and cooperation). The paper contributes to understanding how councils can connect their communities with the issues of household food waste.