KBKevin Barker

Kevin Barker

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Kevin Barker has a total of 63 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    End-to-end codesign in AI-enabled computational science (ENCODE)

    by Robert Rallo, Mahantesh Halappanavar, Kevin Barker, Mark Raugas, Antonino Tumeo, Vidya Chhabria, Andreas Olofsson

  • Open Access

    Cookie-Jar: An Adaptive Re-configurable Framework for Wireless Network Infrastructures

    by Oceane Bel, Burcu O. Mutlu, Joseph Manzano, Cimone Wright-Hamor, Omer Subasi, Kevin J. Barker

    5G advancements like Massive Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) bring high capacity and low latency, but also intensify interference challenges. Static and dynamic coordination techniques address this, often at the cost of increased power draw. We introduce Cookie-Jar (CJ), an interference coordination (IC) framework using reinforcement learning for multi-goal optimization. By dynamically adjusting network, power, and topology parameters based on realtime conditions, CJ improves Signal to Noise and Interference Ratio (SINR) while minimizing power consumption. Simulated 5G experiments showcase CJ's potential, achieving a 15% SINR improvement with near-identical power draw compared to existing methods.

  • Open Access

    Evaluating Emerging AI/ML Accelerators: IPU, RDU, and NVIDIA/AMD GPUs

    by Hongwu Peng, Caiwen Ding, Tong Geng, Sutanay Choudhury, Kevin Barker, Ang Li

    The relentless advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications necessitates the development of specialized hardware accelerators capable of handling the increasing complexity and computational demands. Traditional computing architectures, based on the von Neumann model, are being outstripped by the requirements of contemporary AI/ML algorithms, leading to a surge in the creation of accelerators like the Graphcore Intelligence Processing Unit (IPU), Sambanova Reconfigurable Dataflow Unit (RDU), and enhanced GPU platforms. These hardware accelerators are characterized by their innovative data-flow architectures and other design optimizations that promise to deliver superior performance and energy efficiency for AI/ML tasks. This research provides a preliminary evaluation and comparison of these commercial AI/ML accelerators, delving into their hardware and software design features to discern their strengths and unique capabilities. By conducting a series of benchmark evaluations on common DNN operators and other AI/ML workloads, we aim to illuminate the advantages of data-flow architectures over conventional processor designs and offer insights into the performance trade-offs of each platform. The findings from our study will serve as a valuable reference for the design and performance expectations of research prototypes, thereby facilitating the development of next-generation hardware accelerators tailored for the ever-evolving landscape of AI/ML applications. Through this analysis, we aspire to contribute to the broader understanding of current accelerator technologies and to provide guidance for future innovations in the field.


  • Finding Your Niche: An Evolutionary Approach to HPC Topologies

    by Stephen J. Young, Joshua Suetterlein, Jesun Firoz, Joseph Manzano, Kevin Barker

    Traditional interconnection network design approaches focus on building general network topologies by optimizing the bisection bandwidth or minimizing the network's diameter to reduce the maximum distance between any two nodes, thus amortizing the overall execution time of the HPC workloads. While such network topologies may accommodate a wide variety of applications in general, this may result in sub-optimal performance for many frequently-executed or dynamic workloads. In this paper, instead of focusing on designing an all-encompassing, general-purpose network topology, we develop a methodology to design customized network interconnects, evolved by “finding” the optimal topologies for a particular target workload given by its communication and contention profiles. To this end, we implement a Genetic Algorithm (GA)-based approach for network topology design tailored to improve the overall execution time of a particular workload of interest. We conducted extensive experiments with well-known motifs in physics-based workloads (Sweep3D and FFT), as well as with a representative graph application (MiniVite), using the well-known Structural Simulation Toolkit (SST) Macroscale Element Library (SST/macro) simulator for network interconnect evaluation. We demonstrate that our genetic algorithm-based approach is robust enough to find the underlying optimal topology of a particular workload.

  • Open Access

    Spy in the GPU-box: Covert and Side Channel Attacks on Multi-GPU Systems

    by Sankha Baran Dutta, Hoda Naghibijouybari, Arjun Gupta, Nael Abu-Ghazaleh, Andres Marquez, Kevin Barker

    The deep learning revolution has been enabled in large part by GPUs, and more recently accelerators, which make it possible to carry out computationally demanding training and inference in acceptable times. As the size of machine learning networks and workloads continues to increase, multi-GPU machines have emerged as an important platform offered on High Performance Computing and cloud data centers. Since these machines are shared among multiple users, it becomes increasingly important to protect applications against potential attacks. In this paper, we explore the vulnerability of Nvidia's DGX multi-GPU machines to covert and side channel attacks. These machines consist of a number of discrete GPUs that are interconnected through a combination of custom interconnect (NVLink) and PCIe connections. We reverse engineer the interconnected cache hierarchy and show that it is possible for an attacker on one GPU to cause contention on the L2 cache of another GPU. We use this observation to first develop a covert channel attack across two GPUs, achieving the best bandwidth of around 4 MB/s. We also develop a prime and probe attack on a remote GPU allowing an attacker to recover the cache access pattern of another workload. This access pattern can be used in any number of side channel attacks: we demonstrate a proof of concept attack that fingerprints the application running on the remote GPU, with high accuracy. We also develop a proof of concept attack to extract hyperparameters of a machine learning workload. Our work establishes for the first time the vulnerability of these machines to microarchitectural attacks and can guide future research to improve their security.


  • Open Access

    Table of Contents

    by Rosa M. Badía, Ian Foster, Dejan Milojičić, James Ang, Kevin Barker, Draguna Vrabie, Gökçen Kestor, Yajuan Liu, Zhen Wang, Xiao-Lun Wu, et al.

  • Open Access

    Direction-optimizing Label Propagation Framework for Structure Detection in Graphs: Design, Implementation, and Experimental Analysis

    by Xu T. Liu, Andrew Lumsdaine, Mahantesh Halappanavar, Kevin Barker, Assefaw H. Gebremedhin

    Label Propagation is not only a well-known machine learning algorithm for classification but also an effective method for discovering communities and connected components in networks. We propose a new Direction-optimizing Label Propagation Algorithm (DOLPA) framework that enhances the performance of the standard Label Propagation Algorithm (LPA), increases its scalability, and extends its versatility and application scope. As a central feature, the DOLPA framework relies on the use of frontiers and alternates between label push and label pull operations to attain high performance. It is formulated in such a way that the same basic algorithm can be used for finding communities or connected components in graphs by only changing the objective function used. Additionally, DOLPA has parameters for tuning the processing order of vertices in a graph to reduce the number of edges visited and improve the quality of solution obtained. We present the design and implementation of the enhanced algorithm as well as our shared-memory parallelization of it using OpenMP. We also present an extensive experimental evaluation of our implementations using the LFR benchmark and real-world networks drawn from various domains. Compared with an implementation of LPA for community detection available in a widely used network analysis software, we achieve at most five times the F-Score while maintaining similar runtime for graphs with overlapping communities. We also compare DOLPA against an implementation of the Louvain method for community detection using the same LFR-graphs and show that DOLPA achieves about three times the F-Score at just 10% of the runtime. For connected component decomposition, our algorithm achieves orders of magnitude speedups over the basic LP-based algorithm on large-diameter graphs, up to 13.2× speedup over the Shiloach-Vishkin algorithm, and up to 1.6× speedup over Afforest on an Intel Xeon processor using 40 threads.


  • Comparing the Performance of Blue Gene/Q with Leading Cray XE6 and InfiniBand Systems

    by Darren J. Kerbyson, Kevin J. Barker, Abhinav Vishnu, Adolfy Hoisie

    Three types of systems dominate the current High Performance Computing landscape: the Cray XE6, the IBM Blue Gene, and commodity clusters using InfiniBand. These systems have quite different characteristics making the choice for a particular deployment difficult. The XE6 uses Cray's proprietary Gemini 3-D torus interconnect with two nodes at each network endpoint. The latest IBM Blue Gene/Q uses a single socket integrating processor and communication in a 5-D torus network. InfiniBand provides the flexibility of using nodes from many vendors connected in many possible topologies. The performance characteristics of each vary vastly along with their utilization model. In this work we compare the performance of these three systems using a combination of micro-benchmarks and a set of production applications. We also discuss the causes of variability in performance across the systems and quantify where performance is lost using a combination of measurements and models. Our results show that significant performance can be lost in normal production operation of the Cray XE6 and InfiniBand Clusters in comparison to Blue Gene/Q.