Hualong Liu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Hualong Liu has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kui Hong
Department of Medical Genetics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
2 shared publications - Weiguo Fan
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi China
2 shared publications - Linghua Fu
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
1 shared publication - Wen Zhuo
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
1 shared publication - Yang Shen
Department of Medical Genetics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 20 February 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (4) , 1686
Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Digitalis has been widely utilized for heart failure therapy and several studies have demonstrated an association of digitalis and adverse outcome events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effect of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. Methods: We systematically retrieved relevant studies using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase database. A random effect model was used to pool the effect estimates (hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) when the studies were of high heterogeneity, otherwise a fixed effect model was used. Results: Twenty-one articles containing 44,761 ICD or CRT-D recipients were included. Digitalis was associated with an increased rate of appropriate shocks (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.46–1.86, p < 0.001) and a shortened time to first appropriate shock (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.17–2.65, p = 0.007) in ICD or CRT-D recipients. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality increased in ICD recipients with digitalis therapy (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.34–2.16, p < 0.01), but the all-cause mortality was unchanged in CRT-D recipients (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.92–2.60, p = 0.10) or patients who received ICD or CRT-D therapy (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80–1.48, p = 0.20). The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: ICD recipients with digitalis therapy may tend to have higher mortality rates, but digitalis may not be associated with the mortality rate of CRT-D recipients. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients.
- 20 February 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (4) , 1686
Open AccessEffect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Digitalis has been widely utilized for heart failure therapy and several studies have demonstrated an association of digitalis and adverse outcome events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effect of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. Methods: We systematically retrieved relevant studies using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase database. A random effect model was used to pool the effect estimates (hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) when the studies were of high heterogeneity, otherwise a fixed effect model was used. Results: Twenty-one articles containing 44,761 ICD or CRT-D recipients were included. Digitalis was associated with an increased rate of appropriate shocks (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.46–1.86, p < 0.001) and a shortened time to first appropriate shock (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.17–2.65, p = 0.007) in ICD or CRT-D recipients. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality increased in ICD recipients with digitalis therapy (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.34–2.16, p < 0.01), but the all-cause mortality was unchanged in CRT-D recipients (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.92–2.60, p = 0.10) or patients who received ICD or CRT-D therapy (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80–1.48, p = 0.20). The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: ICD recipients with digitalis therapy may tend to have higher mortality rates, but digitalis may not be associated with the mortality rate of CRT-D recipients. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients.
- 10 January 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
- Vol. 38 (3) , 517-525
The Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors and QT Interval Prolongation in Critically Ill Patients
Introduction Drug-induced QT interval prolongation has been reported to be related to life-threatening polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (torsade de pointes). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are prescribed widely for hospitalized patients; the QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes caused by PPIs were reported. We conducted a study to determine the association between PPI treatment and QT interval prolongation in critically ill patients. Methods This study included patients with electrocardiography (ECG) reports from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database (MIMIC-III). Patients younger than 18 years, missing baseline laboratories and with QT interval prolongation before intensive care unit (ICU) admission were excluded. The end point was the diagnosis of QT interval prolongation reported by ECG. Results This study included 24,512 ICU patients. Of them, 11,327 patients were treated with PPIs, 4181 with histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and 6351 without acid suppression therapy (non-AST); the incidence of QT interval prolongation were 8.5%, 3.3% and 3.4% respectively. After adjustment for demographics, electrolytes, comorbidities and medications, PPIs were associated a higher risk of QT interval prolongation compared with H2RAs (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.36 − 2.03) and non-AST (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.31 − 1.82), while there was not significant difference between H2RAs and non-AST (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.73 − 1.17). In the propensity score matching population, the results were consistent. Pantoprazole (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.52 − 3.03) and lansoprazole (OR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.18 − 2.76) showed a higher QT prolongation risk than omeprazole. Several drugs caused higher QT prolongation risk when used in combination with PPIs. Conclusion In ICU patients, the association between PPI prescription and increased risk of QT interval prolongation was independent of known QT-prolonging factors; pantoprazole and lansoprazole had a higher risk compared with omeprazole. The combination of PPIs and other QT-prolonging drugs should be avoided.
- 10 January 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
- Vol. 38 (3) , 517-525
The Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors and QT Interval Prolongation in Critically Ill Patients
Introduction Drug-induced QT interval prolongation has been reported to be related to life-threatening polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (torsade de pointes). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are prescribed widely for hospitalized patients; the QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes caused by PPIs were reported. We conducted a study to determine the association between PPI treatment and QT interval prolongation in critically ill patients. Methods This study included patients with electrocardiography (ECG) reports from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database (MIMIC-III). Patients younger than 18 years, missing baseline laboratories and with QT interval prolongation before intensive care unit (ICU) admission were excluded. The end point was the diagnosis of QT interval prolongation reported by ECG. Results This study included 24,512 ICU patients. Of them, 11,327 patients were treated with PPIs, 4181 with histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and 6351 without acid suppression therapy (non-AST); the incidence of QT interval prolongation were 8.5%, 3.3% and 3.4% respectively. After adjustment for demographics, electrolytes, comorbidities and medications, PPIs were associated a higher risk of QT interval prolongation compared with H2RAs (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.36 − 2.03) and non-AST (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.31 − 1.82), while there was not significant difference between H2RAs and non-AST (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.73 − 1.17). In the propensity score matching population, the results were consistent. Pantoprazole (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.52 − 3.03) and lansoprazole (OR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.18 − 2.76) showed a higher QT prolongation risk than omeprazole. Several drugs caused higher QT prolongation risk when used in combination with PPIs. Conclusion In ICU patients, the association between PPI prescription and increased risk of QT interval prolongation was independent of known QT-prolonging factors; pantoprazole and lansoprazole had a higher risk compared with omeprazole. The combination of PPIs and other QT-prolonging drugs should be avoided.